In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens

ABSTRACT: Selection for rapid growth has produced heavier, more efficient broiler chickens, but has also introduced health and welfare issues, which may cause or be caused by inactivity. Rapid growth may also limit the performance of motivated behaviors, whereas the provision of enrichment may incre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren C. Dawson, Tina M. Widowski, Zhenzhen Liu, A. Michelle Edwards, Stephanie Torrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-12-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121004740
_version_ 1818401958566821888
author Lauren C. Dawson
Tina M. Widowski
Zhenzhen Liu
A. Michelle Edwards
Stephanie Torrey
author_facet Lauren C. Dawson
Tina M. Widowski
Zhenzhen Liu
A. Michelle Edwards
Stephanie Torrey
author_sort Lauren C. Dawson
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Selection for rapid growth has produced heavier, more efficient broiler chickens, but has also introduced health and welfare issues, which may cause or be caused by inactivity. Rapid growth may also limit the performance of motivated behaviors, whereas the provision of enrichment may increase these behaviors and general activity. This study aimed to evaluate the inactivity, behavior patterns, and enrichment use of 2 fast- (CONV) and 12 slower growing broiler strains (categorized as fastest [FAST], moderate [MOD], and slowest slow [SLOW]), based on their growth rates; 4 strains/category]. To evaluate inactivity, one male and one female from 153 pens were outfitted with omni-directional accelerometers from d 21 until processing (14–24 birds/strain from 8 to 12 pens/strain). Additionally, to supplement inactivity data, 5-min continuous behavioral observations of four focal birds per pen (2 males, 2 females) were conducted on days 26, 42, and 56 (72–148 observations of 8–12 pens/strain) to quantify the duration and frequency of various behaviors; at the same time, 5 to 11 instantaneous scan samples were also performed for pen-based enrichment use. Inactivity peaked at 78 to 80% of the day for all strains; however, those with slower growth rates reached these levels at older ages. Compared to slower growing strains at the same age, faster growing strains were more inactive, spent more time sitting and feeding, spent less time standing and walking, and used enrichments less; these differences mostly occurred at younger ages. Generally, at the same age, strains with similar growth rates (within the same category) behaved similarly, with only a few exceptions. Results suggest that not all strains identified as “slow-growing” broilers behave differently from fast-growing broilers, nor do they all behave similarly to each other. As such, results suggest that improved broiler welfare, particularly with respect to reduced inactivity, the performance of a wider range of normal, motivated behaviors, and/or increased enrichment use, is related to the broiler strain's specific growth rate.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T08:00:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-086ca6c0fb634be0b0b9c8e97a7e4c24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0032-5791
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T08:00:44Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj.art-086ca6c0fb634be0b0b9c8e97a7e4c242022-12-21T23:10:25ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912021-12-0110012101451In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickensLauren C. Dawson0Tina M. Widowski1Zhenzhen Liu2A. Michelle Edwards3Stephanie Torrey4Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada; Corresponding author:Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, CanadaDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, CanadaOntario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, CanadaDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, CanadaABSTRACT: Selection for rapid growth has produced heavier, more efficient broiler chickens, but has also introduced health and welfare issues, which may cause or be caused by inactivity. Rapid growth may also limit the performance of motivated behaviors, whereas the provision of enrichment may increase these behaviors and general activity. This study aimed to evaluate the inactivity, behavior patterns, and enrichment use of 2 fast- (CONV) and 12 slower growing broiler strains (categorized as fastest [FAST], moderate [MOD], and slowest slow [SLOW]), based on their growth rates; 4 strains/category]. To evaluate inactivity, one male and one female from 153 pens were outfitted with omni-directional accelerometers from d 21 until processing (14–24 birds/strain from 8 to 12 pens/strain). Additionally, to supplement inactivity data, 5-min continuous behavioral observations of four focal birds per pen (2 males, 2 females) were conducted on days 26, 42, and 56 (72–148 observations of 8–12 pens/strain) to quantify the duration and frequency of various behaviors; at the same time, 5 to 11 instantaneous scan samples were also performed for pen-based enrichment use. Inactivity peaked at 78 to 80% of the day for all strains; however, those with slower growth rates reached these levels at older ages. Compared to slower growing strains at the same age, faster growing strains were more inactive, spent more time sitting and feeding, spent less time standing and walking, and used enrichments less; these differences mostly occurred at younger ages. Generally, at the same age, strains with similar growth rates (within the same category) behaved similarly, with only a few exceptions. Results suggest that not all strains identified as “slow-growing” broilers behave differently from fast-growing broilers, nor do they all behave similarly to each other. As such, results suggest that improved broiler welfare, particularly with respect to reduced inactivity, the performance of a wider range of normal, motivated behaviors, and/or increased enrichment use, is related to the broiler strain's specific growth rate.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121004740broilerwelfareinactivitybehaviorslow-growing
spellingShingle Lauren C. Dawson
Tina M. Widowski
Zhenzhen Liu
A. Michelle Edwards
Stephanie Torrey
In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens
Poultry Science
broiler
welfare
inactivity
behavior
slow-growing
title In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens
title_full In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens
title_fullStr In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens
title_short In pursuit of a better broiler: a comparison of the inactivity, behavior, and enrichment use of fast- and slower growing broiler chickens
title_sort in pursuit of a better broiler a comparison of the inactivity behavior and enrichment use of fast and slower growing broiler chickens
topic broiler
welfare
inactivity
behavior
slow-growing
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121004740
work_keys_str_mv AT laurencdawson inpursuitofabetterbroileracomparisonoftheinactivitybehaviorandenrichmentuseoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens
AT tinamwidowski inpursuitofabetterbroileracomparisonoftheinactivitybehaviorandenrichmentuseoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens
AT zhenzhenliu inpursuitofabetterbroileracomparisonoftheinactivitybehaviorandenrichmentuseoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens
AT amichelleedwards inpursuitofabetterbroileracomparisonoftheinactivitybehaviorandenrichmentuseoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens
AT stephanietorrey inpursuitofabetterbroileracomparisonoftheinactivitybehaviorandenrichmentuseoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens