Against revolutions

The history of science in public discussion is dominated by large-scale narratives of revolution. These locate epistemic violence within specialist communities, obscuring the role of science in environmental destruction and in silencing other ways of engaging with the world. At the same time, the la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James A. Secord, James Poskett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
Series:BJHS Themes
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058850X24000031/type/journal_article
_version_ 1826865702941753344
author James A. Secord
James Poskett
author_facet James A. Secord
James Poskett
author_sort James A. Secord
collection DOAJ
description The history of science in public discussion is dominated by large-scale narratives of revolution. These locate epistemic violence within specialist communities, obscuring the role of science in environmental destruction and in silencing other ways of engaging with the world. At the same time, the language of revolution has fostered an unrealistic image of science, giving too much prominence to crisis, heroic challenges to authority and the wholescale abandonment of established theory. Revolutionary narratives in history of science were consolidated in the decades around 1900, as the genealogy for an emerging union of science, industry and imperial power. Even when explicitly rejected, they function as ‘ghost narratives’ within teaching and research. Relocating epistemic violence not only involves changing the geography and chronology of established narratives, a project that is well under way. It also requires understanding that revolution is the wrong category of event for communicating science and its history.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:19:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-086ce928f3dd4c3e8bd7b38bb25923b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2058-850X
2056-354X
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-16T21:45:59Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series BJHS Themes
spelling doaj.art-086ce928f3dd4c3e8bd7b38bb25923b02025-01-16T21:52:28ZengCambridge University PressBJHS Themes2058-850X2056-354X2024-01-019173710.1017/bjt.2024.3Against revolutionsJames A. Secord0James PoskettDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, UKThe history of science in public discussion is dominated by large-scale narratives of revolution. These locate epistemic violence within specialist communities, obscuring the role of science in environmental destruction and in silencing other ways of engaging with the world. At the same time, the language of revolution has fostered an unrealistic image of science, giving too much prominence to crisis, heroic challenges to authority and the wholescale abandonment of established theory. Revolutionary narratives in history of science were consolidated in the decades around 1900, as the genealogy for an emerging union of science, industry and imperial power. Even when explicitly rejected, they function as ‘ghost narratives’ within teaching and research. Relocating epistemic violence not only involves changing the geography and chronology of established narratives, a project that is well under way. It also requires understanding that revolution is the wrong category of event for communicating science and its history.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058850X24000031/type/journal_article
spellingShingle James A. Secord
James Poskett
Against revolutions
BJHS Themes
title Against revolutions
title_full Against revolutions
title_fullStr Against revolutions
title_full_unstemmed Against revolutions
title_short Against revolutions
title_sort against revolutions
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2058850X24000031/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesasecord againstrevolutions
AT jamesposkett againstrevolutions