The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systems

<p>Rossby wave-breaking events describe the last stage in the life cycle of baroclinic atmospheric disturbances. These breaking events can strongly influence large-scale circulation and are also related to weather extremes such as heat waves, blocking, and extreme precipitation events. Nonethe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Tamarin-Brodsky, N. Harnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024-02-01
Series:Weather and Climate Dynamics
Online Access:https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/5/87/2024/wcd-5-87-2024.pdf
_version_ 1797336940404539392
author T. Tamarin-Brodsky
N. Harnik
author_facet T. Tamarin-Brodsky
N. Harnik
author_sort T. Tamarin-Brodsky
collection DOAJ
description <p>Rossby wave-breaking events describe the last stage in the life cycle of baroclinic atmospheric disturbances. These breaking events can strongly influence large-scale circulation and are also related to weather extremes such as heat waves, blocking, and extreme precipitation events. Nonetheless, a complete understanding of the synoptic-scale dynamics involved with the breaking events is still absent. For example, it is not clear how well the theoretical life cycle experiments, which use a specified initial perturbation with a single zonal wavenumber and a prescribed simplified initial zonal jet, capture the life cycle of real-atmosphere weather systems. Here we combine a storm-tracking technique together with a wave-breaking detection algorithm to examine how upper-level wave breaking and surface weather systems are related in the North Atlantic during winter. These datasets allow us to examine whether upper-level wave breaking and low-level weather systems always occur simultaneously and if we can identify preferred relations between the surface weather system type (cyclone or anticyclone) and the type of the upper-level breaking event (cyclonic or anticyclonic wave breaking denoted CWB or AWB, respectively). We find that in the North Atlantic, most weather systems are associated with AWB and/or CWB at some point during their lifetime, while only few cyclones and anticyclones do not involve any upper-level wave breaking (roughly 11 % and 15 %, respectively). Our results imply that composites of cyclones and anticyclones involve a mixture of different types of life cycles, depending on whether they involve CWB or AWB, as well as their position relative to the Rossby wave-breaking (RWB) center. Moreover, the system characteristics (including actual and relative positions, intensities, and displacements) differ depending on the associated breaking type. We distinguish between “same-pairing” cases (i.e., cyclone with CWB and anticyclones with AWB) and “opposite-pairing” cases (i.e., cyclones with AWB and anticyclones with CWB). Compositing the cyclones and anticyclones based on this criterion, we find that in similar pairings the surface system is positioned so that its associated upper-level winds would enhance the breaking (the anomalous circulation is in the same direction as the background shear), but, for opposite pairings, the upper-level winds associated with the surface system do not act to enhance the breaking which occurs in the direction of the background shear. A better understanding of the different life cycles of real-atmosphere cyclones and anticyclones and the upper-level breaking they involve is important for exploring the relation between storm tracks and slowly varying weather regimes and how they are mediated by RWB events.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:02:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-086ee7a27fb541c9936696970bf93aa4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2698-4016
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:02:08Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Weather and Climate Dynamics
spelling doaj.art-086ee7a27fb541c9936696970bf93aa42024-02-01T06:33:19ZengCopernicus PublicationsWeather and Climate Dynamics2698-40162024-02-0158710810.5194/wcd-5-87-2024The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systemsT. Tamarin-BrodskyN. Harnik<p>Rossby wave-breaking events describe the last stage in the life cycle of baroclinic atmospheric disturbances. These breaking events can strongly influence large-scale circulation and are also related to weather extremes such as heat waves, blocking, and extreme precipitation events. Nonetheless, a complete understanding of the synoptic-scale dynamics involved with the breaking events is still absent. For example, it is not clear how well the theoretical life cycle experiments, which use a specified initial perturbation with a single zonal wavenumber and a prescribed simplified initial zonal jet, capture the life cycle of real-atmosphere weather systems. Here we combine a storm-tracking technique together with a wave-breaking detection algorithm to examine how upper-level wave breaking and surface weather systems are related in the North Atlantic during winter. These datasets allow us to examine whether upper-level wave breaking and low-level weather systems always occur simultaneously and if we can identify preferred relations between the surface weather system type (cyclone or anticyclone) and the type of the upper-level breaking event (cyclonic or anticyclonic wave breaking denoted CWB or AWB, respectively). We find that in the North Atlantic, most weather systems are associated with AWB and/or CWB at some point during their lifetime, while only few cyclones and anticyclones do not involve any upper-level wave breaking (roughly 11 % and 15 %, respectively). Our results imply that composites of cyclones and anticyclones involve a mixture of different types of life cycles, depending on whether they involve CWB or AWB, as well as their position relative to the Rossby wave-breaking (RWB) center. Moreover, the system characteristics (including actual and relative positions, intensities, and displacements) differ depending on the associated breaking type. We distinguish between “same-pairing” cases (i.e., cyclone with CWB and anticyclones with AWB) and “opposite-pairing” cases (i.e., cyclones with AWB and anticyclones with CWB). Compositing the cyclones and anticyclones based on this criterion, we find that in similar pairings the surface system is positioned so that its associated upper-level winds would enhance the breaking (the anomalous circulation is in the same direction as the background shear), but, for opposite pairings, the upper-level winds associated with the surface system do not act to enhance the breaking which occurs in the direction of the background shear. A better understanding of the different life cycles of real-atmosphere cyclones and anticyclones and the upper-level breaking they involve is important for exploring the relation between storm tracks and slowly varying weather regimes and how they are mediated by RWB events.</p>https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/5/87/2024/wcd-5-87-2024.pdf
spellingShingle T. Tamarin-Brodsky
N. Harnik
The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systems
Weather and Climate Dynamics
title The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systems
title_full The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systems
title_fullStr The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systems
title_full_unstemmed The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systems
title_short The relation between Rossby wave-breaking events and low-level weather systems
title_sort relation between rossby wave breaking events and low level weather systems
url https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/5/87/2024/wcd-5-87-2024.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ttamarinbrodsky therelationbetweenrossbywavebreakingeventsandlowlevelweathersystems
AT nharnik therelationbetweenrossbywavebreakingeventsandlowlevelweathersystems
AT ttamarinbrodsky relationbetweenrossbywavebreakingeventsandlowlevelweathersystems
AT nharnik relationbetweenrossbywavebreakingeventsandlowlevelweathersystems