Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.

This paper highlights issues that appear to have hampered the development and use of knowledge and discusses what these imply for applying (or not) the concept of smart cities in different contexts. The conclusions are based on the findings of four sets of work in the context of the KNOW-4-DRR proje...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Norton, Funda Atun, Miranda Dandoulaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università di Napoli Federico II 2015-10-01
Series:TeMA: Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/3032
_version_ 1797230634721083392
author John Norton
Funda Atun
Miranda Dandoulaki
author_facet John Norton
Funda Atun
Miranda Dandoulaki
author_sort John Norton
collection DOAJ
description This paper highlights issues that appear to have hampered the development and use of knowledge and discusses what these imply for applying (or not) the concept of smart cities in different contexts. The conclusions are based on the findings of four sets of work in the context of the KNOW-4-DRR project. From the findings of these activities, it emerges that although there are differences in context, risk and culture, there is a surprising degree of commonality in opinions about why there is insufficient development and application of knowledge for disaster risk reduction, despite the large volumes of information developed on this subject. As regards ICTs, findings suggest that technology, although useful, is not the sole solution for knowledge- based decision making for DRR. In this respect the benefits of smartness in cities are uncertain and depend on the context, where the employment of simpler or more traditional means can be more appropriate for enabling knowledge.   A final conclusion is that no matter how useful, knowledge itself is not a panacea for DRR. Decision-making is invariably influenced by conflicting priorities, objectives and constraints, and not necessarily in all stakeholders’ interests or even reflecting their objectives. For example in the midst of the Greek economic crisis, disaster risk awareness and acceptability are becoming less a matter of DRR information and knowledge and must rather be addressed with a view to the new hierarchy of risks (socio-economic, health, emerging) generated by the crisis. However, acknowledging the complexity of the issue should not stand in the way of much needed efforts towards enabling knowledge for DRR with all the tools available in today’s changing world.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:31:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-086f0cabbd224ef4849e5011c05f2f70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1970-9889
1970-9870
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:31:36Z
publishDate 2015-10-01
publisher Università di Napoli Federico II
record_format Article
series TeMA: Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
spelling doaj.art-086f0cabbd224ef4849e5011c05f2f702024-04-02T03:34:03ZengUniversità di Napoli Federico IITeMA: Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment1970-98891970-98702015-10-010013515410.6092/1970-9870/30322691Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.John Norton0Funda Atun1Miranda Dandoulaki2Development Workshop FrancePolitecnico of Milan, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DASIU)Harokopio University, Department of GeographyThis paper highlights issues that appear to have hampered the development and use of knowledge and discusses what these imply for applying (or not) the concept of smart cities in different contexts. The conclusions are based on the findings of four sets of work in the context of the KNOW-4-DRR project. From the findings of these activities, it emerges that although there are differences in context, risk and culture, there is a surprising degree of commonality in opinions about why there is insufficient development and application of knowledge for disaster risk reduction, despite the large volumes of information developed on this subject. As regards ICTs, findings suggest that technology, although useful, is not the sole solution for knowledge- based decision making for DRR. In this respect the benefits of smartness in cities are uncertain and depend on the context, where the employment of simpler or more traditional means can be more appropriate for enabling knowledge.   A final conclusion is that no matter how useful, knowledge itself is not a panacea for DRR. Decision-making is invariably influenced by conflicting priorities, objectives and constraints, and not necessarily in all stakeholders’ interests or even reflecting their objectives. For example in the midst of the Greek economic crisis, disaster risk awareness and acceptability are becoming less a matter of DRR information and knowledge and must rather be addressed with a view to the new hierarchy of risks (socio-economic, health, emerging) generated by the crisis. However, acknowledging the complexity of the issue should not stand in the way of much needed efforts towards enabling knowledge for DRR with all the tools available in today’s changing world.http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/3032Disaster Risk ReductionKnowledgeCommunicationSmart CitiesCivil Society.
spellingShingle John Norton
Funda Atun
Miranda Dandoulaki
Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.
TeMA: Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
Disaster Risk Reduction
Knowledge
Communication
Smart Cities
Civil Society.
title Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.
title_full Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.
title_fullStr Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.
title_short Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.
title_sort exploring issues limiting the use of knowledge in disaster risk reduction
topic Disaster Risk Reduction
Knowledge
Communication
Smart Cities
Civil Society.
url http://www.tema.unina.it/index.php/tema/article/view/3032
work_keys_str_mv AT johnnorton exploringissueslimitingtheuseofknowledgeindisasterriskreduction
AT fundaatun exploringissueslimitingtheuseofknowledgeindisasterriskreduction
AT mirandadandoulaki exploringissueslimitingtheuseofknowledgeindisasterriskreduction