Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins

Abstract Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Zapata, E. R. Sobel, C. Del Papa, J. Glodny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-07-01
Series:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008876
_version_ 1797638123213029376
author S. Zapata
E. R. Sobel
C. Del Papa
J. Glodny
author_facet S. Zapata
E. R. Sobel
C. Del Papa
J. Glodny
author_sort S. Zapata
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:58:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-089c6553561e4949a4e6fc1bd5eec551
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:58:08Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj.art-089c6553561e4949a4e6fc1bd5eec5512023-11-03T16:55:37ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272020-07-01217n/an/a10.1029/2019GC008876Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland BasinsS. Zapata0E. R. Sobel1C. Del Papa2J. Glodny3Institute of Geosciences University of Potsdam Potsdam GermanyInstitute of Geosciences University of Potsdam Potsdam GermanyCicterra CONICET‐University of Cordoba Cordoba ArgentinaGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam GermanyAbstract Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008876
spellingShingle S. Zapata
E. R. Sobel
C. Del Papa
J. Glodny
Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
title Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_full Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_fullStr Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_full_unstemmed Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_short Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
title_sort upper plate controls on the formation of broken foreland basins in the andean retroarc between 26°s and 28°s from cretaceous rifting to paleogene and miocene broken foreland basins
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008876
work_keys_str_mv AT szapata upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins
AT ersobel upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins
AT cdelpapa upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins
AT jglodny upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins