Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins
Abstract Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apat...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008876 |
_version_ | 1797638123213029376 |
---|---|
author | S. Zapata E. R. Sobel C. Del Papa J. Glodny |
author_facet | S. Zapata E. R. Sobel C. Del Papa J. Glodny |
author_sort | S. Zapata |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T12:58:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-089c6553561e4949a4e6fc1bd5eec551 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1525-2027 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T12:58:08Z |
publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
spelling | doaj.art-089c6553561e4949a4e6fc1bd5eec5512023-11-03T16:55:37ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272020-07-01217n/an/a10.1029/2019GC008876Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland BasinsS. Zapata0E. R. Sobel1C. Del Papa2J. Glodny3Institute of Geosciences University of Potsdam Potsdam GermanyInstitute of Geosciences University of Potsdam Potsdam GermanyCicterra CONICET‐University of Cordoba Cordoba ArgentinaGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam GermanyAbstract Marked along‐strike changes in stratigraphy, mountain belt morphology, basement exhumation, and deformation styles characterize the Andean retroarc; these changes have previously been related to spatiotemporal variations in the subduction angle. We modeled new apatite fission track and apatite (U‐Th‐Sm)/He data from nine ranges located between 26°S and 28°S. Using new and previously published data, we constructed a Cretaceous to Pliocene paleogeographic model that delineates a four‐stage tectonic evolution: extensional tectonics during the Cretaceous (120–75 Ma), the formation of a broken foreland basin between 55 and 30 Ma, reheating due to burial beneath sedimentary rocks (18–13 Ma), and deformation, exhumation, and surface uplift during the Late Miocene and the Pliocene (13–3 Ma). Our model highlights how preexisting upper plate structures control the deformation patterns of broken foreland basins. Because retroarc deformation predates flat‐slab subduction, we propose that slab anchoring may have been the precursor of Eocene–Oligocene compression in the Andean retroarc. Our model challenges models which consider broken foreland basins and retroarc deformation in the NW Argentinian Andes to be directly related to Miocene flat subduction.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008876 |
spellingShingle | S. Zapata E. R. Sobel C. Del Papa J. Glodny Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
title | Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins |
title_full | Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins |
title_fullStr | Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins |
title_full_unstemmed | Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins |
title_short | Upper Plate Controls on the Formation of Broken Foreland Basins in the Andean Retroarc Between 26°S and 28°S: From Cretaceous Rifting to Paleogene and Miocene Broken Foreland Basins |
title_sort | upper plate controls on the formation of broken foreland basins in the andean retroarc between 26°s and 28°s from cretaceous rifting to paleogene and miocene broken foreland basins |
url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008876 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szapata upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins AT ersobel upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins AT cdelpapa upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins AT jglodny upperplatecontrolsontheformationofbrokenforelandbasinsintheandeanretroarcbetween26sand28sfromcretaceousriftingtopaleogeneandmiocenebrokenforelandbasins |