The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility Study

(1) Background: This study compared anterior attentional–intentional system performance between three groups: Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with normal cognition (PD-NC), with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), and a comparison group (CG). It also evaluated the feasibility of the recruitment an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulina Beata Golińska, Artur Józef Sawicki, Łucja Bieleninik, Mariola Bidzan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/8/1013
_version_ 1797524484640473088
author Paulina Beata Golińska
Artur Józef Sawicki
Łucja Bieleninik
Mariola Bidzan
author_facet Paulina Beata Golińska
Artur Józef Sawicki
Łucja Bieleninik
Mariola Bidzan
author_sort Paulina Beata Golińska
collection DOAJ
description (1) Background: This study compared anterior attentional–intentional system performance between three groups: Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with normal cognition (PD-NC), with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), and a comparison group (CG). It also evaluated the feasibility of the recruitment and study procedures; (2) Methods: From 45 participants recruited, 39 were allocated (mean age 65.31; 43.59% men) to PD-NC, PD-MCI and CG (13 per group). To assess attention, we used three tasks from the ROtman–Baycrest Battery for Investigating Attention: Simple Reaction time (RT), Choice RT, and Prepare RT. We conducted a mixed-model analysis of variance with a 3 (groups) × 4 (tasks) design to compare reaction times; (3) Results: PD-MCI had slower reaction times than PD-NC (<i>p</i> = 0.028) and the CG (<i>p</i> = 0.052); there was no difference between PD-NC and CG. PD-MCI might perform worse on monitoring tasks than PD-NC, <i>Z</i> = −1.68, <i>p</i> = 0.092. Nearly half the volunteers from the CG and 87% of all eligible patients were enrolled in the study and completed all neuropsychological procedures; (4) Conclusions: General cognitive decline appears related to partial deficits in energization and tends to impair attentional monitoring. Furthermore, PD-NC exhibited similar reaction times to the CG. Results from the feasibility study contributed to the definitive study.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:58:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-08a70c25d316433387f4780f8cd5ea35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:58:05Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-08a70c25d316433387f4780f8cd5ea352023-11-22T06:58:45ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-07-01118101310.3390/brainsci11081013The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility StudyPaulina Beata Golińska0Artur Józef Sawicki1Łucja Bieleninik2Mariola Bidzan3Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, 80-309 Gdańsk, PolandInstitute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, 80-309 Gdańsk, PolandInstitute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, 80-309 Gdańsk, PolandInstitute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland(1) Background: This study compared anterior attentional–intentional system performance between three groups: Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with normal cognition (PD-NC), with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), and a comparison group (CG). It also evaluated the feasibility of the recruitment and study procedures; (2) Methods: From 45 participants recruited, 39 were allocated (mean age 65.31; 43.59% men) to PD-NC, PD-MCI and CG (13 per group). To assess attention, we used three tasks from the ROtman–Baycrest Battery for Investigating Attention: Simple Reaction time (RT), Choice RT, and Prepare RT. We conducted a mixed-model analysis of variance with a 3 (groups) × 4 (tasks) design to compare reaction times; (3) Results: PD-MCI had slower reaction times than PD-NC (<i>p</i> = 0.028) and the CG (<i>p</i> = 0.052); there was no difference between PD-NC and CG. PD-MCI might perform worse on monitoring tasks than PD-NC, <i>Z</i> = −1.68, <i>p</i> = 0.092. Nearly half the volunteers from the CG and 87% of all eligible patients were enrolled in the study and completed all neuropsychological procedures; (4) Conclusions: General cognitive decline appears related to partial deficits in energization and tends to impair attentional monitoring. Furthermore, PD-NC exhibited similar reaction times to the CG. Results from the feasibility study contributed to the definitive study.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/8/1013reaction timeexecutive functionsattentionneurodegenerative disorder
spellingShingle Paulina Beata Golińska
Artur Józef Sawicki
Łucja Bieleninik
Mariola Bidzan
The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility Study
Brain Sciences
reaction time
executive functions
attention
neurodegenerative disorder
title The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility Study
title_full The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility Study
title_fullStr The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility Study
title_short The Anterior Attentional–Intentional System in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease—A Pilot and Feasibility Study
title_sort anterior attentional intentional system in patients with parkinson s disease a pilot and feasibility study
topic reaction time
executive functions
attention
neurodegenerative disorder
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/8/1013
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinabeatagolinska theanteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT arturjozefsawicki theanteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT łucjabieleninik theanteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT mariolabidzan theanteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT paulinabeatagolinska anteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT arturjozefsawicki anteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT łucjabieleninik anteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT mariolabidzan anteriorattentionalintentionalsysteminpatientswithparkinsonsdiseaseapilotandfeasibilitystudy