Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular Incisors

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of similarity between contralateral mandibular incisors utilising 3-dimensional (3D) models obtained from micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) scans of extracted human teeth. The null hypothesis was that contralateral mandibular in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gaute Floer Johnsen, Håvard Haugen, J, Liebert Parreiras Nogueira, Usame Sevgi, Ashley Mae Jimenez, Joseph T. DeLuca, Ryan Mancuso, Lucila Piasecki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-02-01
Series:International Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653922000752
_version_ 1797950774293037056
author Gaute Floer Johnsen
Håvard Haugen, J
Liebert Parreiras Nogueira
Usame Sevgi
Ashley Mae Jimenez
Joseph T. DeLuca
Ryan Mancuso
Lucila Piasecki
author_facet Gaute Floer Johnsen
Håvard Haugen, J
Liebert Parreiras Nogueira
Usame Sevgi
Ashley Mae Jimenez
Joseph T. DeLuca
Ryan Mancuso
Lucila Piasecki
author_sort Gaute Floer Johnsen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of similarity between contralateral mandibular incisors utilising 3-dimensional (3D) models obtained from micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) scans of extracted human teeth. The null hypothesis was that contralateral mandibular incisors do not exhibit matching symmetry. Methods: Sixty pairs (n = 120) of extracted mandibular incisors were obtained from 30 patients and scanned with micro-CT with a voxel size of 15.0 μm. 3D virtual models of the pulpal cavities were rendered. Geometric morphometric deviation analysis was performed after mirroring, automatic alignment, and co-registration of the models of contralateral teeth root mean square (RMS) errors were calculated. The quantitative analysis of the 3D models included 6 different geometric parameters. Data sets were examined with a 2-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Post hoc retrospective power analysis was performed to find statistical power (α = 0.05). Results: Contralateral pairs had a narrower distribution in deviation than random pairs. Also, contralateral pairs showed a statistically higher similarity coefficient (5 out of 6 geometric parameters) compared to random pairs (P < .001); no difference was found when comparing central to lateral pairs or between Vertucci type I configurations compared to non-type I. RMS errors had significantly lower Contralateral premolars (CPs) values than random pairs (P < .001). Conclusions: A high degree of similarity was demonstrated for pairing contralateral mandibular incisors using 3D models. The similarity between contralateral central and lateral incisors suggests that when screened and matched, these 4 teeth might be used in endodontic research where similar root canal anatomy is crucial.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:20:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-08b0989ee8d44ba788e58e3d28a5f34f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0020-6539
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:20:27Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-08b0989ee8d44ba788e58e3d28a5f34f2023-01-18T04:29:42ZengElsevierInternational Dental Journal0020-65392023-02-017317178Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular IncisorsGaute Floer Johnsen0Håvard Haugen, J1Liebert Parreiras Nogueira2Usame Sevgi3Ashley Mae Jimenez4Joseph T. DeLuca5Ryan Mancuso6Lucila Piasecki7Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayOral Research Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Periodontics &amp; Endodontics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USADepartment of Periodontics &amp; Endodontics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USADepartment of Periodontics &amp; Endodontics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USADepartment of Periodontics &amp; Endodontics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USAIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of similarity between contralateral mandibular incisors utilising 3-dimensional (3D) models obtained from micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) scans of extracted human teeth. The null hypothesis was that contralateral mandibular incisors do not exhibit matching symmetry. Methods: Sixty pairs (n = 120) of extracted mandibular incisors were obtained from 30 patients and scanned with micro-CT with a voxel size of 15.0 μm. 3D virtual models of the pulpal cavities were rendered. Geometric morphometric deviation analysis was performed after mirroring, automatic alignment, and co-registration of the models of contralateral teeth root mean square (RMS) errors were calculated. The quantitative analysis of the 3D models included 6 different geometric parameters. Data sets were examined with a 2-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Post hoc retrospective power analysis was performed to find statistical power (α = 0.05). Results: Contralateral pairs had a narrower distribution in deviation than random pairs. Also, contralateral pairs showed a statistically higher similarity coefficient (5 out of 6 geometric parameters) compared to random pairs (P < .001); no difference was found when comparing central to lateral pairs or between Vertucci type I configurations compared to non-type I. RMS errors had significantly lower Contralateral premolars (CPs) values than random pairs (P < .001). Conclusions: A high degree of similarity was demonstrated for pairing contralateral mandibular incisors using 3D models. The similarity between contralateral central and lateral incisors suggests that when screened and matched, these 4 teeth might be used in endodontic research where similar root canal anatomy is crucial.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653922000752Anatomic symmetryContralateral incisorsMicro-CT3D-matchingImaging
spellingShingle Gaute Floer Johnsen
Håvard Haugen, J
Liebert Parreiras Nogueira
Usame Sevgi
Ashley Mae Jimenez
Joseph T. DeLuca
Ryan Mancuso
Lucila Piasecki
Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular Incisors
International Dental Journal
Anatomic symmetry
Contralateral incisors
Micro-CT
3D-matching
Imaging
title Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular Incisors
title_full Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular Incisors
title_fullStr Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular Incisors
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular Incisors
title_short Assessment of the Root Canal Similarity in Contralateral Mandibular Incisors
title_sort assessment of the root canal similarity in contralateral mandibular incisors
topic Anatomic symmetry
Contralateral incisors
Micro-CT
3D-matching
Imaging
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653922000752
work_keys_str_mv AT gautefloerjohnsen assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors
AT havardhaugenj assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors
AT liebertparreirasnogueira assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors
AT usamesevgi assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors
AT ashleymaejimenez assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors
AT josephtdeluca assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors
AT ryanmancuso assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors
AT lucilapiasecki assessmentoftherootcanalsimilarityincontralateralmandibularincisors