Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals

The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes. Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied: 16 species of Poaceae, 24 species of Cyperaceae, 14 species of Orchidac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna A. Betekhtina, Daria E. Tukova, Denis V. Veselkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2023-11-01
Series:Plant Diversity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265923000264
_version_ 1797390391399415808
author Anna A. Betekhtina
Daria E. Tukova
Denis V. Veselkin
author_facet Anna A. Betekhtina
Daria E. Tukova
Denis V. Veselkin
author_sort Anna A. Betekhtina
collection DOAJ
description The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes. Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied: 16 species of Poaceae, 24 species of Cyperaceae, 14 species of Orchidaceae, and 7 species of Iridaceae. Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species, the following was determined: number of orders of branching roots; transverse dimensions of root, stele and cortex; number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers; length of root hairs; abundance of mycorrhiza. Species of each family had well-defined syndromes. Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis. Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs. In Iridaceae, roots were branched, and root hairs were short. Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele. Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae. Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery. The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae, Iridaceae, Poaceae, and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:11:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-08b6868fb13c463885a7203abe20efd9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-2659
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:11:03Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Plant Diversity
spelling doaj.art-08b6868fb13c463885a7203abe20efd92023-12-15T07:25:22ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Plant Diversity2468-26592023-11-01456722731Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle UralsAnna A. Betekhtina0Daria E. Tukova1Denis V. Veselkin2Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia; Corresponding author.Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, Ekaterinburg 620002, RussiaUral Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, 8 Marta Street, Ekaterinburg 620144, RussiaThe present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes. Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied: 16 species of Poaceae, 24 species of Cyperaceae, 14 species of Orchidaceae, and 7 species of Iridaceae. Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species, the following was determined: number of orders of branching roots; transverse dimensions of root, stele and cortex; number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers; length of root hairs; abundance of mycorrhiza. Species of each family had well-defined syndromes. Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis. Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs. In Iridaceae, roots were branched, and root hairs were short. Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele. Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae. Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery. The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae, Iridaceae, Poaceae, and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265923000264MonocotsPoaceaeCyperaceaeOrchidaceaeIridaceaeSyndromes of roots structure
spellingShingle Anna A. Betekhtina
Daria E. Tukova
Denis V. Veselkin
Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals
Plant Diversity
Monocots
Poaceae
Cyperaceae
Orchidaceae
Iridaceae
Syndromes of roots structure
title Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals
title_full Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals
title_fullStr Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals
title_full_unstemmed Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals
title_short Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals
title_sort root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the middle urals
topic Monocots
Poaceae
Cyperaceae
Orchidaceae
Iridaceae
Syndromes of roots structure
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265923000264
work_keys_str_mv AT annaabetekhtina rootstructuresyndromesoffourfamiliesofmonocotsinthemiddleurals
AT dariaetukova rootstructuresyndromesoffourfamiliesofmonocotsinthemiddleurals
AT denisvveselkin rootstructuresyndromesoffourfamiliesofmonocotsinthemiddleurals