Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals
The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes. Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied: 16 species of Poaceae, 24 species of Cyperaceae, 14 species of Orchidac...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2023-11-01
|
Series: | Plant Diversity |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265923000264 |
_version_ | 1797390391399415808 |
---|---|
author | Anna A. Betekhtina Daria E. Tukova Denis V. Veselkin |
author_facet | Anna A. Betekhtina Daria E. Tukova Denis V. Veselkin |
author_sort | Anna A. Betekhtina |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes. Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied: 16 species of Poaceae, 24 species of Cyperaceae, 14 species of Orchidaceae, and 7 species of Iridaceae. Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species, the following was determined: number of orders of branching roots; transverse dimensions of root, stele and cortex; number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers; length of root hairs; abundance of mycorrhiza. Species of each family had well-defined syndromes. Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis. Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs. In Iridaceae, roots were branched, and root hairs were short. Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele. Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae. Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery. The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae, Iridaceae, Poaceae, and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T23:11:03Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-08b6868fb13c463885a7203abe20efd9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2468-2659 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T23:11:03Z |
publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
publisher | KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
record_format | Article |
series | Plant Diversity |
spelling | doaj.art-08b6868fb13c463885a7203abe20efd92023-12-15T07:25:22ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Plant Diversity2468-26592023-11-01456722731Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle UralsAnna A. Betekhtina0Daria E. Tukova1Denis V. Veselkin2Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia; Corresponding author.Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, Ekaterinburg 620002, RussiaUral Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, 8 Marta Street, Ekaterinburg 620144, RussiaThe present article tests the following general assumption: plant taxa with different specializations towards mycorrhizal interactions should have different root syndromes. Roots of 61 species common in boreal zone were studied: 16 species of Poaceae, 24 species of Cyperaceae, 14 species of Orchidaceae, and 7 species of Iridaceae. Using a fixed material of 5 individuals of each species, the following was determined: number of orders of branching roots; transverse dimensions of root, stele and cortex; number of primary xylem vessels and exodermis layers; length of root hairs; abundance of mycorrhiza. Species of each family had well-defined syndromes. Roots of Orchidaceae and Iridaceae were thick with a large stele and developed exodermis. Orchidaceae had no branching roots and had long root hairs. In Iridaceae, roots were branched, and root hairs were short. Roots of Poaceae and Cyperaceae were thin with a relatively thin stele. Root hairs were short in Poaceae and long in Cyperaceae. Our finding that root syndromes of four families of monocots differed is a new and unexpected discovery. The high specificity of root syndromes in Cyperaceae, Iridaceae, Poaceae, and Orchidaceae indicates that species of these families use different strategies to obtain water and soil nutrients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265923000264MonocotsPoaceaeCyperaceaeOrchidaceaeIridaceaeSyndromes of roots structure |
spellingShingle | Anna A. Betekhtina Daria E. Tukova Denis V. Veselkin Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals Plant Diversity Monocots Poaceae Cyperaceae Orchidaceae Iridaceae Syndromes of roots structure |
title | Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals |
title_full | Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals |
title_fullStr | Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals |
title_full_unstemmed | Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals |
title_short | Root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the Middle Urals |
title_sort | root structure syndromes of four families of monocots in the middle urals |
topic | Monocots Poaceae Cyperaceae Orchidaceae Iridaceae Syndromes of roots structure |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265923000264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT annaabetekhtina rootstructuresyndromesoffourfamiliesofmonocotsinthemiddleurals AT dariaetukova rootstructuresyndromesoffourfamiliesofmonocotsinthemiddleurals AT denisvveselkin rootstructuresyndromesoffourfamiliesofmonocotsinthemiddleurals |