Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational Study
Background: Masticatory muscle thickness provides objective measurements of the temporomandibular motor function, which may change in patients with oral myofascial pain. Moreover, they are considered as being part of the craniocervical unit by a crucial relationship with cervical muscles and their f...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.743553/full |
_version_ | 1797969106919489536 |
---|---|
author | Carmelo Pirri Caterina Fede Chenglei Fan Diego Guidolin Veronica Macchi Raffaele De Caro Carla Stecco |
author_facet | Carmelo Pirri Caterina Fede Chenglei Fan Diego Guidolin Veronica Macchi Raffaele De Caro Carla Stecco |
author_sort | Carmelo Pirri |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Masticatory muscle thickness provides objective measurements of the temporomandibular motor function, which may change in patients with oral myofascial pain. Moreover, they are considered as being part of the craniocervical unit by a crucial relationship with cervical muscles and their fasciae. In this study, we aimed to assess by ultrasound (US) imaging the fasciae of the masseter, temporal, and sternocleidomastoid muscles to understand their mean thickness and eventual variation in relationship with the muscles, sides, and sex.Methods: We studied 16 healthy volunteers without temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Concerning each subject were evaluated the range of motion of the temporomandibular joint and of the neck, the thickness of muscles and their fasciae of both sides, and the delta of muscle thickness.Results: All the motor evaluations of the subjects showed normal ranges. The US results showed that the fasciae have a mean thickness of 0.50 ± 0.1 mm, which did not change during muscle contraction. The evaluated muscles presented a symmetry between right and left (p > 0.05), even if the delta of muscle (US) thickness had a huge range between different subjects, for example in the masseter muscle from 0.7 to 4.2 mm.Conclusions: Ultrasound imaging is a suitable and reliable tool to study the muscles and fasciae of the head and neck region, permitting also the evaluation of the ability of the muscles to contract. Finally, identifying functional asymmetry that could become symptomatic, US imaging could allow an early rehabilitation treatment. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T02:56:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-08c2b41fa6bf41338303775e2f64913f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2673-6861 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T02:56:55Z |
publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-08c2b41fa6bf41338303775e2f64913f2023-01-02T14:49:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences2673-68612021-12-01210.3389/fresc.2021.743553743553Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational StudyCarmelo PirriCaterina FedeChenglei FanDiego GuidolinVeronica MacchiRaffaele De CaroCarla SteccoBackground: Masticatory muscle thickness provides objective measurements of the temporomandibular motor function, which may change in patients with oral myofascial pain. Moreover, they are considered as being part of the craniocervical unit by a crucial relationship with cervical muscles and their fasciae. In this study, we aimed to assess by ultrasound (US) imaging the fasciae of the masseter, temporal, and sternocleidomastoid muscles to understand their mean thickness and eventual variation in relationship with the muscles, sides, and sex.Methods: We studied 16 healthy volunteers without temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Concerning each subject were evaluated the range of motion of the temporomandibular joint and of the neck, the thickness of muscles and their fasciae of both sides, and the delta of muscle thickness.Results: All the motor evaluations of the subjects showed normal ranges. The US results showed that the fasciae have a mean thickness of 0.50 ± 0.1 mm, which did not change during muscle contraction. The evaluated muscles presented a symmetry between right and left (p > 0.05), even if the delta of muscle (US) thickness had a huge range between different subjects, for example in the masseter muscle from 0.7 to 4.2 mm.Conclusions: Ultrasound imaging is a suitable and reliable tool to study the muscles and fasciae of the head and neck region, permitting also the evaluation of the ability of the muscles to contract. Finally, identifying functional asymmetry that could become symptomatic, US imaging could allow an early rehabilitation treatment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.743553/fullmasticatory musclestemporal muscledeep fasciaultrasonographymasseter musclesternocleidomastoid muscle |
spellingShingle | Carmelo Pirri Caterina Fede Chenglei Fan Diego Guidolin Veronica Macchi Raffaele De Caro Carla Stecco Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational Study Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences masticatory muscles temporal muscle deep fascia ultrasonography masseter muscle sternocleidomastoid muscle |
title | Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational Study |
title_full | Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational Study |
title_short | Ultrasound Imaging of Head/Neck Muscles and Their Fasciae: An Observational Study |
title_sort | ultrasound imaging of head neck muscles and their fasciae an observational study |
topic | masticatory muscles temporal muscle deep fascia ultrasonography masseter muscle sternocleidomastoid muscle |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.743553/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carmelopirri ultrasoundimagingofheadneckmusclesandtheirfasciaeanobservationalstudy AT caterinafede ultrasoundimagingofheadneckmusclesandtheirfasciaeanobservationalstudy AT chengleifan ultrasoundimagingofheadneckmusclesandtheirfasciaeanobservationalstudy AT diegoguidolin ultrasoundimagingofheadneckmusclesandtheirfasciaeanobservationalstudy AT veronicamacchi ultrasoundimagingofheadneckmusclesandtheirfasciaeanobservationalstudy AT raffaeledecaro ultrasoundimagingofheadneckmusclesandtheirfasciaeanobservationalstudy AT carlastecco ultrasoundimagingofheadneckmusclesandtheirfasciaeanobservationalstudy |