Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?

Stephen R. Palmquist* Received: 20/03/2019     |       Accepted: 15/04/2019 After briefly recounting a strange, quasi-mystical experience I had while first reading Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, I devote most of this article to exploring various similarities between theories Kant developed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephen R. Palmquist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Qom 2019-09-01
Series:Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1468_66c508907ba5732175da253edf23eee6.pdf
_version_ 1797705496424087552
author Stephen R. Palmquist
author_facet Stephen R. Palmquist
author_sort Stephen R. Palmquist
collection DOAJ
description Stephen R. Palmquist* Received: 20/03/2019     |       Accepted: 15/04/2019 After briefly recounting a strange, quasi-mystical experience I had while first reading Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, I devote most of this article to exploring various similarities between theories Kant developed and ideas more commonly associated with Paul Tillich. Hints are drawn from Chris Firestone’s book, Kant and Theology at the Boundaries of Reason, which argues that my interpretation of Kant echoes themes in Tillich’s ontology. Among the themes whose Kantian roots I explore are Tillich’s theories of: God as the Ground of Being; faith as ultimate concern; courage as the proper life-choice in the face of the anxiety that naturally arises out of an honest response to the human situation, given our fundamental alienation from the divine; the crucial role of cultural symbols in bringing faith into historically realistic expressions; political forms as ideally self-negating; and love as a gift that we must express with power and justice in order to be efficacious. After considering whether Kant influenced Tillich more than Tillich ever admitted, I conclude by wondering if my own effort to develop an “affirmative” interpretation of Kant’s theory of religion may have itself had a hidden influence from my prior reading of Tillich.   * Professor of Philosophy, Dept. of Religion and Philosophy, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China     ׀        stevepq@hkbu.edu.hk 🞕 Palmquist. S. R. (2019). Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 73۔ 88. doi: 10.22091/jptr.2019.4191.2093
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:37:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-08c96362bb994d9b801977f06c7de974
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-9791
2538-2500
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:37:08Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher University of Qom
record_format Article
series Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī
spelling doaj.art-08c96362bb994d9b801977f06c7de9742023-09-03T06:17:52ZengUniversity of QomPizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī1735-97912538-25002019-09-01213738810.22091/jptr.2019.4191.20931468Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?Stephen R. Palmquist0Professor of Philosophy, Dept. of Religion and Philosophy, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaStephen R. Palmquist* Received: 20/03/2019     |       Accepted: 15/04/2019 After briefly recounting a strange, quasi-mystical experience I had while first reading Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, I devote most of this article to exploring various similarities between theories Kant developed and ideas more commonly associated with Paul Tillich. Hints are drawn from Chris Firestone’s book, Kant and Theology at the Boundaries of Reason, which argues that my interpretation of Kant echoes themes in Tillich’s ontology. Among the themes whose Kantian roots I explore are Tillich’s theories of: God as the Ground of Being; faith as ultimate concern; courage as the proper life-choice in the face of the anxiety that naturally arises out of an honest response to the human situation, given our fundamental alienation from the divine; the crucial role of cultural symbols in bringing faith into historically realistic expressions; political forms as ideally self-negating; and love as a gift that we must express with power and justice in order to be efficacious. After considering whether Kant influenced Tillich more than Tillich ever admitted, I conclude by wondering if my own effort to develop an “affirmative” interpretation of Kant’s theory of religion may have itself had a hidden influence from my prior reading of Tillich.   * Professor of Philosophy, Dept. of Religion and Philosophy, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China     ׀        stevepq@hkbu.edu.hk 🞕 Palmquist. S. R. (2019). Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 73۔ 88. doi: 10.22091/jptr.2019.4191.2093http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1468_66c508907ba5732175da253edf23eee6.pdfimmanuel kantpaul tillichfaith as ultimate concerncouragesymbolsself-negating politicslove as gift
spellingShingle Stephen R. Palmquist
Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?
Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī
immanuel kant
paul tillich
faith as ultimate concern
courage
symbols
self-negating politics
love as gift
title Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?
title_full Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?
title_fullStr Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?
title_full_unstemmed Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?
title_short Does Tillich Have A Hidden Debt To Kant?
title_sort does tillich have a hidden debt to kant
topic immanuel kant
paul tillich
faith as ultimate concern
courage
symbols
self-negating politics
love as gift
url http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1468_66c508907ba5732175da253edf23eee6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenrpalmquist doestillichhaveahiddendebttokant