Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?

In its own time, Ben Jonson’s 1616 Folio was considered revolutionary. Jonson’s contemporaries were astonished by his hubris in printing a collected Workes, which included a number of plays and masques, in a folio volume during his own lifetime. At the same time, his folio served as a model for the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lynn S. Meskill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut du Monde Anglophone 2008-10-01
Series:Etudes Epistémè
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/736
_version_ 1818127571609452544
author Lynn S. Meskill
author_facet Lynn S. Meskill
author_sort Lynn S. Meskill
collection DOAJ
description In its own time, Ben Jonson’s 1616 Folio was considered revolutionary. Jonson’s contemporaries were astonished by his hubris in printing a collected Workes, which included a number of plays and masques, in a folio volume during his own lifetime. At the same time, his folio served as a model for the First Folio of Shakespeare and Beaumont and Fletcher’s 1647 Folio. Plays and masques were regularly printed in quarto and octavo volumes in the early modern period, so the novelty of the 1616 Folio does not lie in the printing of plays and masques. Rather, the publication of these highly collaborative genres in a volume dedicated to the fame of the single « Author » may well have been at the heart of the revolutionary aspect of Jonson’s project. In Sejanus, His Fall (1605), Hymenaei (1606) and The Haddington Masque (1608), we see how Jonson confronts the moral quandary of appropriating his collaborators’ work for himself and the strategies he uses to justify himself for posterity.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T07:19:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-08cd7b6b39544c5bb41667e45cc32321
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1634-0450
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T07:19:28Z
publishDate 2008-10-01
publisher Institut du Monde Anglophone
record_format Article
series Etudes Epistémè
spelling doaj.art-08cd7b6b39544c5bb41667e45cc323212022-12-22T01:16:08ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04502008-10-011410.4000/episteme.736Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?Lynn S. MeskillIn its own time, Ben Jonson’s 1616 Folio was considered revolutionary. Jonson’s contemporaries were astonished by his hubris in printing a collected Workes, which included a number of plays and masques, in a folio volume during his own lifetime. At the same time, his folio served as a model for the First Folio of Shakespeare and Beaumont and Fletcher’s 1647 Folio. Plays and masques were regularly printed in quarto and octavo volumes in the early modern period, so the novelty of the 1616 Folio does not lie in the printing of plays and masques. Rather, the publication of these highly collaborative genres in a volume dedicated to the fame of the single « Author » may well have been at the heart of the revolutionary aspect of Jonson’s project. In Sejanus, His Fall (1605), Hymenaei (1606) and The Haddington Masque (1608), we see how Jonson confronts the moral quandary of appropriating his collaborators’ work for himself and the strategies he uses to justify himself for posterity.http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/736
spellingShingle Lynn S. Meskill
Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?
Etudes Epistémè
title Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?
title_full Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?
title_fullStr Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?
title_full_unstemmed Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?
title_short Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?
title_sort ben jonson s 1616 folio a revolution in print
url http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/736
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnsmeskill benjonsons1616folioarevolutioninprint