Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Introduction: Ligament balancing is essential to the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal method of alignment remains a controversial issue. The primary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of TKA between functional and adjusted mechanical alignment techniques....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey Michaud, Marchand Philippe, Kouyoumdjian Pascal, Coulomb Remy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2024-01-01
Series:SICOT-J
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sicot-j.org/articles/sicotj/full_html/2024/01/sicotj230080/sicotj230080.html
_version_ 1797343387789033472
author Jeffrey Michaud
Marchand Philippe
Kouyoumdjian Pascal
Coulomb Remy
author_facet Jeffrey Michaud
Marchand Philippe
Kouyoumdjian Pascal
Coulomb Remy
author_sort Jeffrey Michaud
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Ligament balancing is essential to the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal method of alignment remains a controversial issue. The primary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of TKA between functional and adjusted mechanical alignment techniques. The secondary objectives were to compare bone resection, robotic alignment, and radiological assessment. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective case-control series comparing TKA performed with functional alignment (FA) and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Sixty-four FA subjects were matched with 64 aMA controls. These two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgeon, and type of frontal deformity. Both surgical procedures were performed using the MAKO® haptic robotic system. Functional scores (Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) were measured at the final postoperative follow-up. A radiographic evaluation was performed at the same time. Results: Mean FJS were respectively 63.4 ± 25.1 [0–100] and 51.2 ± 31.8 [0–100] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.034). Mean OKS were respectively 40.8 ± 6.3 [21–48] and 34.9 ± 11.8 [3–48] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.027). Mean KSS were respectively 184.9 ± 17.0 [126–200] and 175.6 ± 23.1 [102–200] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.02). The main residual symptom was “none” for 73.0% versus 57.8%, “instability” for 6.4% versus 21.9%, “Pain” for 19.1% versus 12.5%, and “effusion” for 1.6% and 7.8% respectively for FA and aMA group (p = 0.016). There were 4 complications in the FA group versus 5 in the aMA group (p > 0.999). Mean postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) robotic assessment were respectively 177.3° ± 2.0 [172–180] and 178.2° ± 2.0 [173–180] for FA and aMA group (p = 0.018). The median difference between HKA robotic and HKA radiological was −3.0° (IQR = 3.0; p < 0.001). Conclusion: With greater residual deformity and without release, functional alignment showed a statistically significantly better short-term clinical outcome than adjusted mechanical alignment. This difference may not be clinically significant.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:46:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-08eff8f7f16946b7a1f0680c07283273
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2426-8887
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T10:46:52Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series SICOT-J
spelling doaj.art-08eff8f7f16946b7a1f0680c072832732024-01-26T16:53:40ZengEDP SciencesSICOT-J2426-88872024-01-0110210.1051/sicotj/2024002sicotj230080Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignmentJeffrey Michaud0https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9841-5200Marchand Philippe1Kouyoumdjian Pascal2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-9600Coulomb Remy3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-9356Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery Department, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier 1, NîmesOrthopedic and Traumatology Surgery Department, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier 1, NîmesOrthopedic and Traumatology Surgery Department, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier 1, NîmesOrthopedic and Traumatology Surgery Department, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier 1, NîmesIntroduction: Ligament balancing is essential to the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal method of alignment remains a controversial issue. The primary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of TKA between functional and adjusted mechanical alignment techniques. The secondary objectives were to compare bone resection, robotic alignment, and radiological assessment. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective case-control series comparing TKA performed with functional alignment (FA) and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Sixty-four FA subjects were matched with 64 aMA controls. These two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgeon, and type of frontal deformity. Both surgical procedures were performed using the MAKO® haptic robotic system. Functional scores (Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) were measured at the final postoperative follow-up. A radiographic evaluation was performed at the same time. Results: Mean FJS were respectively 63.4 ± 25.1 [0–100] and 51.2 ± 31.8 [0–100] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.034). Mean OKS were respectively 40.8 ± 6.3 [21–48] and 34.9 ± 11.8 [3–48] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.027). Mean KSS were respectively 184.9 ± 17.0 [126–200] and 175.6 ± 23.1 [102–200] in FA versus aMA group (p = 0.02). The main residual symptom was “none” for 73.0% versus 57.8%, “instability” for 6.4% versus 21.9%, “Pain” for 19.1% versus 12.5%, and “effusion” for 1.6% and 7.8% respectively for FA and aMA group (p = 0.016). There were 4 complications in the FA group versus 5 in the aMA group (p > 0.999). Mean postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) robotic assessment were respectively 177.3° ± 2.0 [172–180] and 178.2° ± 2.0 [173–180] for FA and aMA group (p = 0.018). The median difference between HKA robotic and HKA radiological was −3.0° (IQR = 3.0; p < 0.001). Conclusion: With greater residual deformity and without release, functional alignment showed a statistically significantly better short-term clinical outcome than adjusted mechanical alignment. This difference may not be clinically significant.https://www.sicot-j.org/articles/sicotj/full_html/2024/01/sicotj230080/sicotj230080.htmltkaligament balancingadjusted mechanical alignmentmakofunctional alignment
spellingShingle Jeffrey Michaud
Marchand Philippe
Kouyoumdjian Pascal
Coulomb Remy
Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment
SICOT-J
tka
ligament balancing
adjusted mechanical alignment
mako
functional alignment
title Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment
title_full Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment
title_fullStr Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment
title_full_unstemmed Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment
title_short Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment
title_sort short term functional outcomes of robotic assisted tka are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment
topic tka
ligament balancing
adjusted mechanical alignment
mako
functional alignment
url https://www.sicot-j.org/articles/sicotj/full_html/2024/01/sicotj230080/sicotj230080.html
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreymichaud shorttermfunctionaloutcomesofroboticassistedtkaarebetterwithfunctionalalignmentcomparedtoadjustedmechanicalalignment
AT marchandphilippe shorttermfunctionaloutcomesofroboticassistedtkaarebetterwithfunctionalalignmentcomparedtoadjustedmechanicalalignment
AT kouyoumdjianpascal shorttermfunctionaloutcomesofroboticassistedtkaarebetterwithfunctionalalignmentcomparedtoadjustedmechanicalalignment
AT coulombremy shorttermfunctionaloutcomesofroboticassistedtkaarebetterwithfunctionalalignmentcomparedtoadjustedmechanicalalignment