POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVING

While the concept of body-mounted cameras (BMC) worn by police officers is a controversial issue, it is not new. Since in the early-2000s, police departments across the United States, England, Brazil, and Australia have been implementing wearable cameras. Like all devices used in policing, body-moun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noel Otu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Charles Sturt University 2016-11-01
Series:Salus Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://salusjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Otu_Salus_Journal_Volume_4_Number_3_2016_pp_49-64.pdf
_version_ 1818609123896328192
author Noel Otu
author_facet Noel Otu
author_sort Noel Otu
collection DOAJ
description While the concept of body-mounted cameras (BMC) worn by police officers is a controversial issue, it is not new. Since in the early-2000s, police departments across the United States, England, Brazil, and Australia have been implementing wearable cameras. Like all devices used in policing, body-mounted cameras can create a sense of increased power, but also additional responsibilities for both the agencies and individual officers. This paper examines the public debate regarding body-mounted cameras. The conclusions drawn show that while these devices can provide information about incidents relating to police–citizen encounters, and can deter citizen and police misbehavior, these devices can also violate a citizen’s privacy rights. This paper outlines several ramifications for practice as well as implications for policy.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:53:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-090b411abac94005a074711478c1739e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2202-5677
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:53:33Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Charles Sturt University
record_format Article
series Salus Journal
spelling doaj.art-090b411abac94005a074711478c1739e2022-12-21T22:27:32ZengCharles Sturt UniversitySalus Journal2202-56772016-11-01434964POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVINGNoel Otu0University of TexasWhile the concept of body-mounted cameras (BMC) worn by police officers is a controversial issue, it is not new. Since in the early-2000s, police departments across the United States, England, Brazil, and Australia have been implementing wearable cameras. Like all devices used in policing, body-mounted cameras can create a sense of increased power, but also additional responsibilities for both the agencies and individual officers. This paper examines the public debate regarding body-mounted cameras. The conclusions drawn show that while these devices can provide information about incidents relating to police–citizen encounters, and can deter citizen and police misbehavior, these devices can also violate a citizen’s privacy rights. This paper outlines several ramifications for practice as well as implications for policy.https://salusjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Otu_Salus_Journal_Volume_4_Number_3_2016_pp_49-64.pdfpolicebody-mounted camerasliability insurancedeterrence
spellingShingle Noel Otu
POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVING
Salus Journal
police
body-mounted cameras
liability insurance
deterrence
title POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVING
title_full POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVING
title_fullStr POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVING
title_full_unstemmed POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVING
title_short POLICE BODY CAMERAS: SEEING MAY BE BELIEVING
title_sort police body cameras seeing may be believing
topic police
body-mounted cameras
liability insurance
deterrence
url https://salusjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Otu_Salus_Journal_Volume_4_Number_3_2016_pp_49-64.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT noelotu policebodycamerasseeingmaybebelieving