Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model

Abstract Background This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of the output of three-dimensional (3D) customized surgical guides and titanium implants in a rabbit model, and of mandibulectomy, reconstructive surgery, and surgical outcome; additionally, the correlation between surgical accuracy and su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Keun Kim, Min Ji Ham, Won Rae Kim, Hyung Giun Kim, Kwang Jun Kwon, Seong Gon Kim, Young Wook Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-01-01
Series:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00375-9
_version_ 1811175918333329408
author Min Keun Kim
Min Ji Ham
Won Rae Kim
Hyung Giun Kim
Kwang Jun Kwon
Seong Gon Kim
Young Wook Park
author_facet Min Keun Kim
Min Ji Ham
Won Rae Kim
Hyung Giun Kim
Kwang Jun Kwon
Seong Gon Kim
Young Wook Park
author_sort Min Keun Kim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of the output of three-dimensional (3D) customized surgical guides and titanium implants in a rabbit model, and of mandibulectomy, reconstructive surgery, and surgical outcome; additionally, the correlation between surgical accuracy and surgical outcomes, including the differences in surgical outcome according to surgical accuracy, was analyzed. Results The output of implants was accurately implemented within the error range (− 0.03–0.03 mm), and the surgical accuracy varied depending on the measured area (range − 0.4–1.1 mm). Regarding surgical outcomes, angle between the mandibular lower borders showed the most sensitive results and distance between the lingual cusps of the first molars represented the most accurate outcomes. A significant correlation was noted between surgical accuracy in the anteroposterior length of the upper borders pre- and postoperatively and the angle between the mandibular lower borders (regression coefficient = 0.491, p = 0.028). In the group wherein surgery was performed more accurately, the angle between the mandibular lower borders was reproduced more accurately (p = 0.021). A selective laser melting machine accurately printed the implants as designed. Considering the positive correlation among surgical accuracy in the mandibular upper borders, angle between the mandibular lower borders, and more accurately reproduced angle between the mandibular lower borders, the angle between the mandibular lower borders is considered a good indicator for evaluating the outcomes of reconstructive surgery. Conclusion To reduce errors in surgical outcomes, it is necessary to devise a positioner for the surgical guide and design a 3D surgical guide to constantly maintain the direction of bone resection. A fixed area considering the concept of three-point fixation should be selected for stable positioning of the implant; in some cases, bilateral cortical bone fixation should be considered. The angle between the mandibular lower borders is a sensitive indicator for evaluating the outcomes of reconstructive surgery.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:43:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-090c38f5de7f4f48844a9edeac1bbdb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2288-8586
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:43:46Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
spelling doaj.art-090c38f5de7f4f48844a9edeac1bbdb22023-01-29T12:06:48ZengSpringerOpenMaxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery2288-85862023-01-0145111710.1186/s40902-023-00375-9Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit modelMin Keun Kim0Min Ji Ham1Won Rae Kim2Hyung Giun Kim3Kwang Jun Kwon4Seong Gon Kim5Young Wook Park6Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National UniversityFunctional Materials and Components R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial TechnologyFunctional Materials and Components R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial TechnologyFunctional Materials and Components R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial TechnologyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National UniversityDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National UniversityDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National UniversityAbstract Background This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of the output of three-dimensional (3D) customized surgical guides and titanium implants in a rabbit model, and of mandibulectomy, reconstructive surgery, and surgical outcome; additionally, the correlation between surgical accuracy and surgical outcomes, including the differences in surgical outcome according to surgical accuracy, was analyzed. Results The output of implants was accurately implemented within the error range (− 0.03–0.03 mm), and the surgical accuracy varied depending on the measured area (range − 0.4–1.1 mm). Regarding surgical outcomes, angle between the mandibular lower borders showed the most sensitive results and distance between the lingual cusps of the first molars represented the most accurate outcomes. A significant correlation was noted between surgical accuracy in the anteroposterior length of the upper borders pre- and postoperatively and the angle between the mandibular lower borders (regression coefficient = 0.491, p = 0.028). In the group wherein surgery was performed more accurately, the angle between the mandibular lower borders was reproduced more accurately (p = 0.021). A selective laser melting machine accurately printed the implants as designed. Considering the positive correlation among surgical accuracy in the mandibular upper borders, angle between the mandibular lower borders, and more accurately reproduced angle between the mandibular lower borders, the angle between the mandibular lower borders is considered a good indicator for evaluating the outcomes of reconstructive surgery. Conclusion To reduce errors in surgical outcomes, it is necessary to devise a positioner for the surgical guide and design a 3D surgical guide to constantly maintain the direction of bone resection. A fixed area considering the concept of three-point fixation should be selected for stable positioning of the implant; in some cases, bilateral cortical bone fixation should be considered. The angle between the mandibular lower borders is a sensitive indicator for evaluating the outcomes of reconstructive surgery.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00375-93D printingCustomized titanium implantSurgical guideAccuracyRabbit model
spellingShingle Min Keun Kim
Min Ji Ham
Won Rae Kim
Hyung Giun Kim
Kwang Jun Kwon
Seong Gon Kim
Young Wook Park
Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
3D printing
Customized titanium implant
Surgical guide
Accuracy
Rabbit model
title Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model
title_full Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model
title_fullStr Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model
title_short Investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3D customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model
title_sort investigating the accuracy of mandibulectomy and reconstructive surgery using 3d customized implants and surgical guides in a rabbit model
topic 3D printing
Customized titanium implant
Surgical guide
Accuracy
Rabbit model
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00375-9
work_keys_str_mv AT minkeunkim investigatingtheaccuracyofmandibulectomyandreconstructivesurgeryusing3dcustomizedimplantsandsurgicalguidesinarabbitmodel
AT minjiham investigatingtheaccuracyofmandibulectomyandreconstructivesurgeryusing3dcustomizedimplantsandsurgicalguidesinarabbitmodel
AT wonraekim investigatingtheaccuracyofmandibulectomyandreconstructivesurgeryusing3dcustomizedimplantsandsurgicalguidesinarabbitmodel
AT hyunggiunkim investigatingtheaccuracyofmandibulectomyandreconstructivesurgeryusing3dcustomizedimplantsandsurgicalguidesinarabbitmodel
AT kwangjunkwon investigatingtheaccuracyofmandibulectomyandreconstructivesurgeryusing3dcustomizedimplantsandsurgicalguidesinarabbitmodel
AT seonggonkim investigatingtheaccuracyofmandibulectomyandreconstructivesurgeryusing3dcustomizedimplantsandsurgicalguidesinarabbitmodel
AT youngwookpark investigatingtheaccuracyofmandibulectomyandreconstructivesurgeryusing3dcustomizedimplantsandsurgicalguidesinarabbitmodel