Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting

Abstract Background The PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes (PROVEN) aims to test the effectiveness of an advance care planning (ACP) video intervention. Relatively little is known about the challenges associated with implementing ACP interventions in the nursing home (NH) setting, e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer A. Palmer, Victoria A. Parker, Vincent Mor, Angelo E. Volandes, Lacey R. Barre, Emmanuelle Belanger, Phoebe Carter, Lacey Loomer, Ellen McCreedy, Susan L. Mitchell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4309-5
_version_ 1818917206903226368
author Jennifer A. Palmer
Victoria A. Parker
Vincent Mor
Angelo E. Volandes
Lacey R. Barre
Emmanuelle Belanger
Phoebe Carter
Lacey Loomer
Ellen McCreedy
Susan L. Mitchell
author_facet Jennifer A. Palmer
Victoria A. Parker
Vincent Mor
Angelo E. Volandes
Lacey R. Barre
Emmanuelle Belanger
Phoebe Carter
Lacey Loomer
Ellen McCreedy
Susan L. Mitchell
author_sort Jennifer A. Palmer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes (PROVEN) aims to test the effectiveness of an advance care planning (ACP) video intervention. Relatively little is known about the challenges associated with implementing ACP interventions in the nursing home (NH) setting, especially within a pragmatic trial. To address this research gap, this report sought to identify facilitators of and barriers to implementing PROVEN from the perspective of the Champions charged with introducing the ACP video program delivery to patients and families. Methods In semi-structured telephone interviews at 4 and 15 months of the 18-month implementation period, ACP Champions at all PROVEN intervention facilities (N = 119) were asked about their perceptions of program implementation. Forty interviews were purposively sampled, transcribed, and analyzed using a hybrid deductive/inductive approach to thematic analysis incorporating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research’s domains: Intervention Characteristics (IC), Inner Setting (IS), Characteristics of Individuals (CI), Outer Setting (OS), and Process (P). Results Implementation facilitators identified by Champions included: the intervention’s adaptable mode of presentation and minimal time burden (IC) as well as the program’s customizable delivery to patients and families and opportunity for group reflection on implementation among ACP Champions (P). Barriers included mandated protocol-driven aspects of the program (OS), limited time to deliver the intervention (IS), and lack of perceived relevance and emotional readiness for ACP amongst stakeholders (CI). Conclusions Despite the promise of PROVEN’s intervention for improving ACP in nursing homes, unchangeable setting and characteristics of Champions, patients, and family members presented implementation barriers. Researchers need to engage all program participants (i.e., facility staff, patients, and families), in addition to corporate-level stakeholders, in early pragmatic trial design to minimize such obstacles. Further, despite the facilitating nature of PROVEN’s implementation processes, the study encountered tension between scientific rigor and real-world demands. Researchers need to optimize the real-world authenticity of pragmatic trial design while avoiding excessive implementation protocol deviations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02612688. Registered 19 November 2015.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:30:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-091cec2144884e1b80bf9d0a3ac04afa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:30:23Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-091cec2144884e1b80bf9d0a3ac04afa2022-12-21T19:59:56ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632019-07-0119111210.1186/s12913-019-4309-5Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home settingJennifer A. Palmer0Victoria A. Parker1Vincent Mor2Angelo E. Volandes3Lacey R. Barre4Emmanuelle Belanger5Phoebe Carter6Lacey Loomer7Ellen McCreedy8Susan L. Mitchell9Harvard Medical SchoolPeter T. Paul College of Business and Economics, University of New HampshireCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityHarvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityHebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging ResearchDepartment of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityHarvard Medical SchoolAbstract Background The PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes (PROVEN) aims to test the effectiveness of an advance care planning (ACP) video intervention. Relatively little is known about the challenges associated with implementing ACP interventions in the nursing home (NH) setting, especially within a pragmatic trial. To address this research gap, this report sought to identify facilitators of and barriers to implementing PROVEN from the perspective of the Champions charged with introducing the ACP video program delivery to patients and families. Methods In semi-structured telephone interviews at 4 and 15 months of the 18-month implementation period, ACP Champions at all PROVEN intervention facilities (N = 119) were asked about their perceptions of program implementation. Forty interviews were purposively sampled, transcribed, and analyzed using a hybrid deductive/inductive approach to thematic analysis incorporating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research’s domains: Intervention Characteristics (IC), Inner Setting (IS), Characteristics of Individuals (CI), Outer Setting (OS), and Process (P). Results Implementation facilitators identified by Champions included: the intervention’s adaptable mode of presentation and minimal time burden (IC) as well as the program’s customizable delivery to patients and families and opportunity for group reflection on implementation among ACP Champions (P). Barriers included mandated protocol-driven aspects of the program (OS), limited time to deliver the intervention (IS), and lack of perceived relevance and emotional readiness for ACP amongst stakeholders (CI). Conclusions Despite the promise of PROVEN’s intervention for improving ACP in nursing homes, unchangeable setting and characteristics of Champions, patients, and family members presented implementation barriers. Researchers need to engage all program participants (i.e., facility staff, patients, and families), in addition to corporate-level stakeholders, in early pragmatic trial design to minimize such obstacles. Further, despite the facilitating nature of PROVEN’s implementation processes, the study encountered tension between scientific rigor and real-world demands. Researchers need to optimize the real-world authenticity of pragmatic trial design while avoiding excessive implementation protocol deviations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02612688. Registered 19 November 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4309-5Pragmatic trialImplementationNursing homes
spellingShingle Jennifer A. Palmer
Victoria A. Parker
Vincent Mor
Angelo E. Volandes
Lacey R. Barre
Emmanuelle Belanger
Phoebe Carter
Lacey Loomer
Ellen McCreedy
Susan L. Mitchell
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting
BMC Health Services Research
Pragmatic trial
Implementation
Nursing homes
title Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting
title_full Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting
title_short Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting
title_sort barriers and facilitators to implementing a pragmatic trial to improve advance care planning in the nursing home setting
topic Pragmatic trial
Implementation
Nursing homes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4309-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferapalmer barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT victoriaaparker barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT vincentmor barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT angeloevolandes barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT laceyrbarre barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT emmanuellebelanger barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT phoebecarter barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT laceyloomer barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT ellenmccreedy barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting
AT susanlmitchell barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapragmatictrialtoimproveadvancecareplanninginthenursinghomesetting