Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot Study

The purpose of this study was to compare the skeletodental changes and the efficacy of overbite correction achieved by Ricketts Bioprogressive Therapy and Burstone Segmented Arch Technique. The sample comprised 15 patients who have passed the peak pubertal growth period and who had brachifacial or m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Banu Çakırer, Aslı Ender Telli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2001-12-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-nvestigation-of-ntrusion-mechanics-of-/53985
_version_ 1797767234332917760
author Banu Çakırer
Aslı Ender Telli
author_facet Banu Çakırer
Aslı Ender Telli
author_sort Banu Çakırer
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to compare the skeletodental changes and the efficacy of overbite correction achieved by Ricketts Bioprogressive Therapy and Burstone Segmented Arch Technique. The sample comprised 15 patients who have passed the peak pubertal growth period and who had brachifacial or mesofacial growth patterns with at least 3 mm overbite. Eight patients were treated with upper and lower utility arches and seven patients were treated with upper and lower base-arches. Lateral cephalograms, taken before treatment (Tl) and immediately after the overbite correction was achieved (T2), were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data. Both techniques produced a highly significant overbite reduction. Minimal increases in facial gnomon, oral gnomon and horizontal plane-mandibular plane angle due to treatment, did not effect anterior facial height significantly in neither of the groups. Both groups showed significant upper incisor intrusion however it was more in the Burstone group than in the Ricketts group. Intrusion of lower incisors in the Burstone group was significantly different from the minimal vertical position changes these teeth displayed in the Ricketts group. Lower incisor proclination was not significant in neither of the groups. However, the increase in the pro-clination of upper incisors in the Ricketts group was significantly different from the minimal increase in the Burstone group.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:36:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0928be16dcfa42a18bc79f111c8bce92
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:36:50Z
publishDate 2001-12-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-0928be16dcfa42a18bc79f111c8bce922023-08-01T12:55:03ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052001-12-0114313815310.13076/1300-3550-14-3-13813049054Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot StudyBanu Çakırer0Aslı Ender Telli1 Hacettepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti A.B.D. Research Fellow, Poliklinik für Kieferorıhopödic, Heinrich Heine Üniversitat, Düsseldorf and Consultant Orthodontist Dental Centre Rheindahlen, Germany The purpose of this study was to compare the skeletodental changes and the efficacy of overbite correction achieved by Ricketts Bioprogressive Therapy and Burstone Segmented Arch Technique. The sample comprised 15 patients who have passed the peak pubertal growth period and who had brachifacial or mesofacial growth patterns with at least 3 mm overbite. Eight patients were treated with upper and lower utility arches and seven patients were treated with upper and lower base-arches. Lateral cephalograms, taken before treatment (Tl) and immediately after the overbite correction was achieved (T2), were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data. Both techniques produced a highly significant overbite reduction. Minimal increases in facial gnomon, oral gnomon and horizontal plane-mandibular plane angle due to treatment, did not effect anterior facial height significantly in neither of the groups. Both groups showed significant upper incisor intrusion however it was more in the Burstone group than in the Ricketts group. Intrusion of lower incisors in the Burstone group was significantly different from the minimal vertical position changes these teeth displayed in the Ricketts group. Lower incisor proclination was not significant in neither of the groups. However, the increase in the pro-clination of upper incisors in the Ricketts group was significantly different from the minimal increase in the Burstone group. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-nvestigation-of-ntrusion-mechanics-of-/53985 deepbiteintrusionutility archbase-arch
spellingShingle Banu Çakırer
Aslı Ender Telli
Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot Study
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
deepbite
intrusion
utility arch
base-arch
title Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot Study
title_full Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot Study
title_fullStr Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot Study
title_short Comparative Investigation of Intrusion Mechanics of Burstone Segmental Arc Technique and Ricketts Bioprogressive Treatment Technique in the Treatment of Adult Deep Sealed Closure Cases - Clinical Pilot Study
title_sort comparative investigation of intrusion mechanics of burstone segmental arc technique and ricketts bioprogressive treatment technique in the treatment of adult deep sealed closure cases clinical pilot study
topic deepbite
intrusion
utility arch
base-arch
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-nvestigation-of-ntrusion-mechanics-of-/53985
work_keys_str_mv AT banucakırer comparativeinvestigationofintrusionmechanicsofburstonesegmentalarctechniqueandrickettsbioprogressivetreatmenttechniqueinthetreatmentofadultdeepsealedclosurecasesclinicalpilotstudy
AT aslıendertelli comparativeinvestigationofintrusionmechanicsofburstonesegmentalarctechniqueandrickettsbioprogressivetreatmenttechniqueinthetreatmentofadultdeepsealedclosurecasesclinicalpilotstudy