Molise

In Molise region 75% of women (aged 24-64) are screened regularly, meaning every 3 years. The analysis on cross-protective activity exercised by bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines shows that the bivalent vaccine could prevent more pre-cancerous lesions and cases of cervicocarcinoma than quadrivalent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberto Gasparini, Donatella Panatto, Bruna Dirodi, Rosa Prato, Gianni Amunni, Valter Turello, Luigi Sudano, Paolo Cristoforoni, Sara Boccalini, Paolo Bonanni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SEEd Medical Publishers 2012-11-01
Series:Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/461
_version_ 1811337625376653312
author Roberto Gasparini
Donatella Panatto
Bruna Dirodi
Rosa Prato
Gianni Amunni
Valter Turello
Luigi Sudano
Paolo Cristoforoni
Sara Boccalini
Paolo Bonanni
author_facet Roberto Gasparini
Donatella Panatto
Bruna Dirodi
Rosa Prato
Gianni Amunni
Valter Turello
Luigi Sudano
Paolo Cristoforoni
Sara Boccalini
Paolo Bonanni
author_sort Roberto Gasparini
collection DOAJ
description In Molise region 75% of women (aged 24-64) are screened regularly, meaning every 3 years. The analysis on cross-protective activity exercised by bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines shows that the bivalent vaccine could prevent more pre-cancerous lesions and cases of cervicocarcinoma than quadrivalent, and that the latter could prevent genital warts that are not prevented by bivalent. The major number of cases avoided by the bivalent make it possible to fully offset the cost savings related to warts associated with the quadrivalent vaccine. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness analysis shows that, considering regional tariffs, the multiple cohort (12-year-old + 25-year-old women) vaccination strategy with a 90% coverage could prevent 3 cases of cervicocarcinoma and 1 related death more than the vaccination of only 12-year-old girls, and thus proves to be cost-effective (10,517 €/QALY).
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:58:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0938818126674b0a9764f5a53d5082f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2240-256X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:58:33Z
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher SEEd Medical Publishers
record_format Article
series Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
spelling doaj.art-0938818126674b0a9764f5a53d5082f92022-12-22T02:36:22ZengSEEd Medical PublishersFarmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways2240-256X2012-11-01132S495110.7175/fe.v13i2S.461426MoliseRoberto Gasparini0Donatella Panatto1Bruna Dirodi2Rosa Prato3Gianni Amunni4Valter Turello5Luigi Sudano6Paolo Cristoforoni7Sara Boccalini8Paolo Bonanni9Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di GenovaDipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di GenovaDirezione Access to Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, VeronaDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università degli Studi di FoggiaDipartimento di Ginecologia, Perinatologia e Riproduzione Umana, Università di FirenzeDipartimento di Prevenzione U.O. Igiene e Sanità Pubblica, Azienda USL 3 GenovaAssessorato Sanità, Salute e Politiche Sociali, Servizio Igiene, Sanità Pubblica, Veterinaria e degli Ambienti di lavoroDipartimento di Oncologia Ginecologica, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, GenovaDipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università di FirenzeDipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università di FirenzeIn Molise region 75% of women (aged 24-64) are screened regularly, meaning every 3 years. The analysis on cross-protective activity exercised by bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines shows that the bivalent vaccine could prevent more pre-cancerous lesions and cases of cervicocarcinoma than quadrivalent, and that the latter could prevent genital warts that are not prevented by bivalent. The major number of cases avoided by the bivalent make it possible to fully offset the cost savings related to warts associated with the quadrivalent vaccine. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness analysis shows that, considering regional tariffs, the multiple cohort (12-year-old + 25-year-old women) vaccination strategy with a 90% coverage could prevent 3 cases of cervicocarcinoma and 1 related death more than the vaccination of only 12-year-old girls, and thus proves to be cost-effective (10,517 €/QALY).https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/461hpvvaccination strategyscreeningmolisecost-effectiveness analysis
spellingShingle Roberto Gasparini
Donatella Panatto
Bruna Dirodi
Rosa Prato
Gianni Amunni
Valter Turello
Luigi Sudano
Paolo Cristoforoni
Sara Boccalini
Paolo Bonanni
Molise
Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
hpv
vaccination strategy
screening
molise
cost-effectiveness analysis
title Molise
title_full Molise
title_fullStr Molise
title_full_unstemmed Molise
title_short Molise
title_sort molise
topic hpv
vaccination strategy
screening
molise
cost-effectiveness analysis
url https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/461
work_keys_str_mv AT robertogasparini molise
AT donatellapanatto molise
AT brunadirodi molise
AT rosaprato molise
AT gianniamunni molise
AT valterturello molise
AT luigisudano molise
AT paolocristoforoni molise
AT saraboccalini molise
AT paolobonanni molise