Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models
Background: Little is known on accuracy comparisons among 3D-printing trueness and precision to produce dental models. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of different 3D-printing technologies (SLA; DLP; LCD poly and monochromatic; and Polyjet). Methods: Fifteen models were man...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/17/8425 |
_version_ | 1797496550268600320 |
---|---|
author | Jun Ho Kim Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista Ana Paula Ayres Renan Lúcio Berbel da Silva Jacqueline Ferreira Lima Gabriel Sardinha Urbano Juliana No-Cortes Mayra Torres Vasques Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes |
author_facet | Jun Ho Kim Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista Ana Paula Ayres Renan Lúcio Berbel da Silva Jacqueline Ferreira Lima Gabriel Sardinha Urbano Juliana No-Cortes Mayra Torres Vasques Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes |
author_sort | Jun Ho Kim |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Little is known on accuracy comparisons among 3D-printing trueness and precision to produce dental models. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of different 3D-printing technologies (SLA; DLP; LCD poly and monochromatic; and Polyjet). Methods: Fifteen models were manufactured by the five different 3D printers used in this study. The manufactured models were physically measured in the corresponding lengths for trueness and reproducibility. Means and standard deviations were obtained for the five computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) methods and compared. Results: No significant difference was found in the comparison between observers in all measurements performed with the different model algorithms. Pairwise Wilcoxon non-parametric test comparisons of trueness between 3D-printers revealed statistically significant differences between Stratasys versus Anycubic (<i>p</i> = 0.025) and Anycubic versus Form 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.048). Conclusion: The present findings suggest that the 3D-printing methods may have small significant discrepancies when compared to the original digital files, which may not be clinically relevant. In addition, there were no significant discrepancies among median measurements of each printing method (within 3D-printer analysis), which suggests that, for dental casts, all of the studied devices performed similarly. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T03:05:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-093f5e2013e848d6885df1a078dcb792 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3417 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T03:05:17Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Applied Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-093f5e2013e848d6885df1a078dcb7922023-11-23T12:39:19ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172022-08-011217842510.3390/app12178425Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental ModelsJun Ho Kim0Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista1Ana Paula Ayres2Renan Lúcio Berbel da Silva3Jacqueline Ferreira Lima4Gabriel Sardinha Urbano5Juliana No-Cortes6Mayra Torres Vasques7Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes8Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, BrazilDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, BrazilDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, BrazilDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, BrazilDepartment of Dental Prosthesis, Simple Dental Center, São Paulo 01332-000, BrazilDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, BrazilDepartment of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, MaltaDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, BrazilDepartment of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Dental Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, MaltaBackground: Little is known on accuracy comparisons among 3D-printing trueness and precision to produce dental models. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of different 3D-printing technologies (SLA; DLP; LCD poly and monochromatic; and Polyjet). Methods: Fifteen models were manufactured by the five different 3D printers used in this study. The manufactured models were physically measured in the corresponding lengths for trueness and reproducibility. Means and standard deviations were obtained for the five computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) methods and compared. Results: No significant difference was found in the comparison between observers in all measurements performed with the different model algorithms. Pairwise Wilcoxon non-parametric test comparisons of trueness between 3D-printers revealed statistically significant differences between Stratasys versus Anycubic (<i>p</i> = 0.025) and Anycubic versus Form 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.048). Conclusion: The present findings suggest that the 3D-printing methods may have small significant discrepancies when compared to the original digital files, which may not be clinically relevant. In addition, there were no significant discrepancies among median measurements of each printing method (within 3D-printer analysis), which suggests that, for dental casts, all of the studied devices performed similarly.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/17/84253D-printingcomputer-aided manufacturingdental models |
spellingShingle | Jun Ho Kim Otavio Henrique Pinhata-Baptista Ana Paula Ayres Renan Lúcio Berbel da Silva Jacqueline Ferreira Lima Gabriel Sardinha Urbano Juliana No-Cortes Mayra Torres Vasques Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models Applied Sciences 3D-printing computer-aided manufacturing dental models |
title | Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models |
title_full | Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models |
title_fullStr | Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models |
title_short | Accuracy Comparison among 3D-Printing Technologies to Produce Dental Models |
title_sort | accuracy comparison among 3d printing technologies to produce dental models |
topic | 3D-printing computer-aided manufacturing dental models |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/17/8425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT junhokim accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT otaviohenriquepinhatabaptista accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT anapaulaayres accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT renanlucioberbeldasilva accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT jacquelineferreiralima accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT gabrielsardinhaurbano accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT juliananocortes accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT mayratorresvasques accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels AT arthurrodriguezgonzalezcortes accuracycomparisonamong3dprintingtechnologiestoproducedentalmodels |