Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation
INTRODUCTION The popularity of academic social networks like ResearchGate and Academia.edu indicates that scholars want to share their work, yet for universities with Open Access (OA) policies, these sites may be competing with institutional repositories (IRs) for content. This article seeks to reve...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Iowa State University Digital Press
2017-08-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12790/ |
| _version_ | 1797222079640109056 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrée J. Rathemacher Corey Lang Divana Boukari Julia Lovett |
| author_facet | Andrée J. Rathemacher Corey Lang Divana Boukari Julia Lovett |
| author_sort | Andrée J. Rathemacher |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | INTRODUCTION The popularity of academic social networks like ResearchGate and Academia.edu indicates that scholars want to share their work, yet for universities with Open Access (OA) policies, these sites may be competing with institutional repositories (IRs) for content. This article seeks to reveal researcher practices, attitudes, and motivations around uploading their work to ResearchGate and complying with an institutional OA Policy through a study of faculty at the University of Rhode Island (URI). METHODS We conducted a population study to examine the participation by 558 full-time URI faculty members in the OA Policy and ResearchGate followed by a survey of 728 full-time URI faculty members about their participation in the two services. DISCUSSION The majority of URI faculty does not participate in the OA Policy or use ResearchGate. Authors’ primary motivations for participation are sharing their work more broadly and increasing its visibility and impact. Faculty who participate in ResearchGate are more likely to participate in the OA Policy, and vice versa. The fact that the OA Policy targets the author manuscript and not the final published article constitutes a significant barrier to participation. CONCLUSION Librarians should not view academic social networks as a threat to Open Access. Authors’ strong preference for sharing the final, published version of their articles provides support for calls to hasten the transition to a Gold OA publishing system. Misunderstandings about the OA Policy and copyright indicate a need for librarians to conduct greater education and outreach to authors about options for legally sharing articles. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:15:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0940a712286843928281d6d310579eba |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2162-3309 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:15:38Z |
| publishDate | 2017-08-01 |
| publisher | Iowa State University Digital Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication |
| spelling | doaj.art-0940a712286843928281d6d310579eba2024-04-04T17:32:54ZengIowa State University Digital PressJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication2162-33092017-08-015110.7710/2162-3309.2183Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate ParticipationAndrée J. Rathemacher0Corey Lang1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-7760Divana Boukari2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-1905Julia Lovett3 University of Rhode IslandUniversity of Rhode IslandUniversity Libraries, University of Rhode IslandINTRODUCTION The popularity of academic social networks like ResearchGate and Academia.edu indicates that scholars want to share their work, yet for universities with Open Access (OA) policies, these sites may be competing with institutional repositories (IRs) for content. This article seeks to reveal researcher practices, attitudes, and motivations around uploading their work to ResearchGate and complying with an institutional OA Policy through a study of faculty at the University of Rhode Island (URI). METHODS We conducted a population study to examine the participation by 558 full-time URI faculty members in the OA Policy and ResearchGate followed by a survey of 728 full-time URI faculty members about their participation in the two services. DISCUSSION The majority of URI faculty does not participate in the OA Policy or use ResearchGate. Authors’ primary motivations for participation are sharing their work more broadly and increasing its visibility and impact. Faculty who participate in ResearchGate are more likely to participate in the OA Policy, and vice versa. The fact that the OA Policy targets the author manuscript and not the final published article constitutes a significant barrier to participation. CONCLUSION Librarians should not view academic social networks as a threat to Open Access. Authors’ strong preference for sharing the final, published version of their articles provides support for calls to hasten the transition to a Gold OA publishing system. Misunderstandings about the OA Policy and copyright indicate a need for librarians to conduct greater education and outreach to authors about options for legally sharing articles.https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12790/Open AccessGreen OAinstitutional repositoriespermissions-based open access policiesacademic social networksscholarly communication |
| spellingShingle | Andrée J. Rathemacher Corey Lang Divana Boukari Julia Lovett Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication Open Access Green OA institutional repositories permissions-based open access policies academic social networks scholarly communication |
| title | Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation |
| title_full | Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation |
| title_fullStr | Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation |
| title_short | Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation |
| title_sort | institutional repositories and academic social networks competition or complement a study of open access policy compliance vs researchgate participation |
| topic | Open Access Green OA institutional repositories permissions-based open access policies academic social networks scholarly communication |
| url | https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12790/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreejrathemacher institutionalrepositoriesandacademicsocialnetworkscompetitionorcomplementastudyofopenaccesspolicycompliancevsresearchgateparticipation AT coreylang institutionalrepositoriesandacademicsocialnetworkscompetitionorcomplementastudyofopenaccesspolicycompliancevsresearchgateparticipation AT divanaboukari institutionalrepositoriesandacademicsocialnetworkscompetitionorcomplementastudyofopenaccesspolicycompliancevsresearchgateparticipation AT julialovett institutionalrepositoriesandacademicsocialnetworkscompetitionorcomplementastudyofopenaccesspolicycompliancevsresearchgateparticipation |