Social influence in televised election debates: a potential distortion of democracy.
A recent innovation in televised election debates is a continuous response measure (commonly referred to as the "worm") that allows viewers to track the response of a sample of undecided voters in real-time. A potential danger of presenting such data is that it may prevent people from maki...
Main Authors: | Colin J Davis, Jeffrey S Bowers, Amina Memon |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011-03-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21479191/pdf/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
Spanish Television Channels and the 13-J Election Debate: Programing Strategies and Social Audience
by: Marta SAAVEDRA LLAMAS, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
The Formats of Pre-Election Television Debates in Poland and the Czech Republic – A Rhetorical Look at the Genre
by: Agnieszka Budzyńska-Daca, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY ELECTIONS
by: Sadik HAXHIU, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Use of Twitter during Televised Election Debates: Spanish General Election (28 April 2019) vs. French General Election (24 April 2022)
by: Julia Fontenla-Pedreira, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Populism in the Communication Strategy of Lula and Bolsonaro: An Analysis of the Television Debates in Brazil’s 2022 General Election
by: Francisco-Sérgio Lima-de-Sousa, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)