Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modeling

Large areas of synoptic-scale ice PSCs (polar stratospheric clouds) distinguished the Arctic winter 2009/2010 from other years and revealed unprecedented evidence of water redistribution in the stratosphere. A unique snapshot of water vapor repartitioning into ice particles was obtained under extrem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. Engel, B. P. Luo, S. M. Khaykin, F. G. Wienhold, H. Vömel, R. Kivi, C. R. Hoyle, J.-U. Grooß, M. C. Pitts, T. Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-04-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/3231/2014/acp-14-3231-2014.pdf
_version_ 1818683541119041536
author I. Engel
B. P. Luo
S. M. Khaykin
F. G. Wienhold
H. Vömel
R. Kivi
C. R. Hoyle
J.-U. Grooß
M. C. Pitts
T. Peter
author_facet I. Engel
B. P. Luo
S. M. Khaykin
F. G. Wienhold
H. Vömel
R. Kivi
C. R. Hoyle
J.-U. Grooß
M. C. Pitts
T. Peter
author_sort I. Engel
collection DOAJ
description Large areas of synoptic-scale ice PSCs (polar stratospheric clouds) distinguished the Arctic winter 2009/2010 from other years and revealed unprecedented evidence of water redistribution in the stratosphere. A unique snapshot of water vapor repartitioning into ice particles was obtained under extremely cold Arctic conditions with temperatures around 183 K. Balloon-borne, aircraft and satellite-based measurements suggest that synoptic-scale ice PSCs and concurrent reductions and enhancements in water vapor are tightly linked with the observed de- and rehydration signatures, respectively. In a companion paper (Part 1), water vapor and aerosol backscatter measurements from the RECONCILE (Reconciliation of essential process parameters for an enhanced predictability of Arctic stratospheric ozone loss and its climate interactions) and LAPBIAT-II (Lapland Atmosphere–Biosphere Facility) field campaigns have been analyzed in detail. This paper uses a column version of the Zurich Optical and Microphysical box Model (ZOMM) including newly developed NAT (nitric acid trihydrate) and ice nucleation parameterizations. Particle sedimentation is calculated in order to simulate the vertical redistribution of chemical species such as water and nitric acid. Despite limitations given by wind shear and uncertainties in the initial water vapor profile, the column modeling unequivocally shows that (1) accounting for small-scale temperature fluctuations along the trajectories is essential in order to reach agreement between simulated optical cloud properties and observations, and (2) the use of recently developed heterogeneous ice nucleation parameterizations allows the reproduction of the observed signatures of de- and rehydration. Conversely, the vertical redistribution of water measured cannot be explained in terms of homogeneous nucleation of ice clouds, whose particle radii remain too small to cause significant dehydration.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T10:36:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0957f54fdc524657b9b4f1c6333f79d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T10:36:22Z
publishDate 2014-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-0957f54fdc524657b9b4f1c6333f79d22022-12-21T21:52:21ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242014-04-011473231324610.5194/acp-14-3231-2014Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modelingI. Engel0B. P. Luo1S. M. Khaykin2F. G. Wienhold3H. Vömel4R. Kivi5C. R. Hoyle6J.-U. Grooß7M. C. Pitts8T. Peter9Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCentral Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, RussiaInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDeutscher Wetterdienst, Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg – Richard Aßmann Observatory, Lindenberg, GermanyFinnish Meteorological Institute, Arctic Research, Sodankylä, FinlandLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, SwitzerlandInstitut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Stratosphäre (IEK-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, GermanyNASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USAInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandLarge areas of synoptic-scale ice PSCs (polar stratospheric clouds) distinguished the Arctic winter 2009/2010 from other years and revealed unprecedented evidence of water redistribution in the stratosphere. A unique snapshot of water vapor repartitioning into ice particles was obtained under extremely cold Arctic conditions with temperatures around 183 K. Balloon-borne, aircraft and satellite-based measurements suggest that synoptic-scale ice PSCs and concurrent reductions and enhancements in water vapor are tightly linked with the observed de- and rehydration signatures, respectively. In a companion paper (Part 1), water vapor and aerosol backscatter measurements from the RECONCILE (Reconciliation of essential process parameters for an enhanced predictability of Arctic stratospheric ozone loss and its climate interactions) and LAPBIAT-II (Lapland Atmosphere–Biosphere Facility) field campaigns have been analyzed in detail. This paper uses a column version of the Zurich Optical and Microphysical box Model (ZOMM) including newly developed NAT (nitric acid trihydrate) and ice nucleation parameterizations. Particle sedimentation is calculated in order to simulate the vertical redistribution of chemical species such as water and nitric acid. Despite limitations given by wind shear and uncertainties in the initial water vapor profile, the column modeling unequivocally shows that (1) accounting for small-scale temperature fluctuations along the trajectories is essential in order to reach agreement between simulated optical cloud properties and observations, and (2) the use of recently developed heterogeneous ice nucleation parameterizations allows the reproduction of the observed signatures of de- and rehydration. Conversely, the vertical redistribution of water measured cannot be explained in terms of homogeneous nucleation of ice clouds, whose particle radii remain too small to cause significant dehydration.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/3231/2014/acp-14-3231-2014.pdf
spellingShingle I. Engel
B. P. Luo
S. M. Khaykin
F. G. Wienhold
H. Vömel
R. Kivi
C. R. Hoyle
J.-U. Grooß
M. C. Pitts
T. Peter
Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modeling
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modeling
title_full Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modeling
title_fullStr Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modeling
title_full_unstemmed Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modeling
title_short Arctic stratospheric dehydration – Part 2: Microphysical modeling
title_sort arctic stratospheric dehydration part 2 microphysical modeling
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/3231/2014/acp-14-3231-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT iengel arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT bpluo arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT smkhaykin arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT fgwienhold arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT hvomel arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT rkivi arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT crhoyle arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT jugrooß arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT mcpitts arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling
AT tpeter arcticstratosphericdehydrationpart2microphysicalmodeling