Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry

The issues of conducting short inquiry from the position of prosecutor’s procedural status are considered. Low rate of applying short inquiry is caused by ignorance about this procedural form among the participants in criminal procedure. The initiators of conducting short inquiry were not suspects (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nikanorov S.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation 2014-12-01
Series:Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika
Subjects:
Online Access:http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/nikanorov.pdf
_version_ 1811312585345073152
author Nikanorov S.A.
author_facet Nikanorov S.A.
author_sort Nikanorov S.A.
collection DOAJ
description The issues of conducting short inquiry from the position of prosecutor’s procedural status are considered. Low rate of applying short inquiry is caused by ignorance about this procedural form among the participants in criminal procedure. The initiators of conducting short inquiry were not suspects (accused), but their lawyers who followed by their own ambitions, not by the interests of defendants. The insufficiency of total time of short inquiry is noted. The author proposes to minimize prosecutors’ paperwork, notably to concentrate their attention on collecting crime data by conducting secret investigation operations, receiving explanations and other documentation. Obtained data should be processed according to police regulations. Confession of guilt, recognition of damage and consent with legal assessment of criminal act allow to collect only the evidence, indicating crime event and complicacy of a person (expertise should be established on court’s initiative). The favourable conditions of adequacy of collected evidence for establishing crime event, character and amount of damage, as well as guilt of committing crime are confirmed. The right of investigators not to examine evidences if they were not contradicted by suspect, victim or his/her representative (predetermined strength of evidence) is criticized. There is no short effective procedure of trying criminal cases with rational division of powers among the authorities, conducting criminal proceeding. The author proves the necessity of reasonable approach to prosecutor’s supervision of conducting short inquiry. Main tendency of further improvement of short inquiry procedure is redivision of powers among agencies in charge of preliminary investigation and prosecutor’s office.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:38:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-095be480d74c4ce68f46b936e91d04fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1998-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:38:52Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation
record_format Article
series Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika
spelling doaj.art-095be480d74c4ce68f46b936e91d04fa2022-12-22T02:49:58ZengTyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian FederationUridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika1998-69632014-12-014(30)211216Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiryNikanorov S.A.0Nizhny Novgorod Law AcademyThe issues of conducting short inquiry from the position of prosecutor’s procedural status are considered. Low rate of applying short inquiry is caused by ignorance about this procedural form among the participants in criminal procedure. The initiators of conducting short inquiry were not suspects (accused), but their lawyers who followed by their own ambitions, not by the interests of defendants. The insufficiency of total time of short inquiry is noted. The author proposes to minimize prosecutors’ paperwork, notably to concentrate their attention on collecting crime data by conducting secret investigation operations, receiving explanations and other documentation. Obtained data should be processed according to police regulations. Confession of guilt, recognition of damage and consent with legal assessment of criminal act allow to collect only the evidence, indicating crime event and complicacy of a person (expertise should be established on court’s initiative). The favourable conditions of adequacy of collected evidence for establishing crime event, character and amount of damage, as well as guilt of committing crime are confirmed. The right of investigators not to examine evidences if they were not contradicted by suspect, victim or his/her representative (predetermined strength of evidence) is criticized. There is no short effective procedure of trying criminal cases with rational division of powers among the authorities, conducting criminal proceeding. The author proves the necessity of reasonable approach to prosecutor’s supervision of conducting short inquiry. Main tendency of further improvement of short inquiry procedure is redivision of powers among agencies in charge of preliminary investigation and prosecutor’s office.http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/nikanorov.pdfshort inquiry forminvestigatortime of inquirysuspectsstatus of prosecutor
spellingShingle Nikanorov S.A.
Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry
Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika
short inquiry form
investigator
time of inquiry
suspects
status of prosecutor
title Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry
title_full Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry
title_fullStr Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry
title_full_unstemmed Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry
title_short Procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry
title_sort procedural status of prosecutor during the conduction of short inquiry
topic short inquiry form
investigator
time of inquiry
suspects
status of prosecutor
url http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/nikanorov.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nikanorovsa proceduralstatusofprosecutorduringtheconductionofshortinquiry