Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum

Introduction: Program evaluation is one of the strategies for developing and improving educational programs in every discipline and level of study. It also helps to improve the program effectiveness and efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the doctoral nursing students’ viewpoints about...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansoureh Farahani, Fazloallah Ahmadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Center 2006-06-01
Series:مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-188-en.pdf
_version_ 1797638409023389696
author Mansoureh Farahani
Fazloallah Ahmadi
author_facet Mansoureh Farahani
Fazloallah Ahmadi
author_sort Mansoureh Farahani
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Program evaluation is one of the strategies for developing and improving educational programs in every discipline and level of study. It also helps to improve the program effectiveness and efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the doctoral nursing students’ viewpoints about the nursing PhD curriculum. Methods: A descriptive study was performed on 20 randomly selected doctoral nursing students from different universities of Iran in 2004. The data was collected using semi-structured interviews. Then, data was categorized and presented as frequency distribution. Results: The participants mentioned that the courses of PhD program could make their views towards patients more holistic. Ninety five percent of the participants requested an increase in the credit hours of “Nursing theory”, “Nursing research methods” and, “Philosophy” courses. Seventy five percent of them mentioned that “Testing and evaluation methods”, “Evaluation principles”, and “Psychology and Learning theories” courses had overlap with some courses in master program. Ninety percent emphasized on the importance of English course in PhD curriculum. Fifty five percent mentioned that the content of computer courses could not increase students’ capabilities in regard to the course objectives. Conclusion: The content of nursing PhD program is not flexible, the courses are mandatory, and the content of some courses have overlap with some courses in master program. Revising and planning educational programs according to society’s needs, can help to promote this profession.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T13:02:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0969d47714374c8c8dcf615f0bd096d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1608-9359
1735-8892
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-11T13:02:10Z
publishDate 2006-06-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Center
record_format Article
series مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
spelling doaj.art-0969d47714374c8c8dcf615f0bd096d72023-11-03T16:29:52ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Centerمجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی1608-93591735-88922006-06-01618392Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD CurriculumMansoureh Farahani0Fazloallah Ahmadi1 Introduction: Program evaluation is one of the strategies for developing and improving educational programs in every discipline and level of study. It also helps to improve the program effectiveness and efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the doctoral nursing students’ viewpoints about the nursing PhD curriculum. Methods: A descriptive study was performed on 20 randomly selected doctoral nursing students from different universities of Iran in 2004. The data was collected using semi-structured interviews. Then, data was categorized and presented as frequency distribution. Results: The participants mentioned that the courses of PhD program could make their views towards patients more holistic. Ninety five percent of the participants requested an increase in the credit hours of “Nursing theory”, “Nursing research methods” and, “Philosophy” courses. Seventy five percent of them mentioned that “Testing and evaluation methods”, “Evaluation principles”, and “Psychology and Learning theories” courses had overlap with some courses in master program. Ninety percent emphasized on the importance of English course in PhD curriculum. Fifty five percent mentioned that the content of computer courses could not increase students’ capabilities in regard to the course objectives. Conclusion: The content of nursing PhD program is not flexible, the courses are mandatory, and the content of some courses have overlap with some courses in master program. Revising and planning educational programs according to society’s needs, can help to promote this profession.http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-188-en.pdfcurriculumnursing phdstudent.
spellingShingle Mansoureh Farahani
Fazloallah Ahmadi
Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum
مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
curriculum
nursing phd
student.
title Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum
title_full Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum
title_fullStr Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum
title_full_unstemmed Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum
title_short Doctoral Nursing Students’ Viewpoints about the Nursing PhD Curriculum
title_sort doctoral nursing students viewpoints about the nursing phd curriculum
topic curriculum
nursing phd
student.
url http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-188-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourehfarahani doctoralnursingstudentsviewpointsaboutthenursingphdcurriculum
AT fazloallahahmadi doctoralnursingstudentsviewpointsaboutthenursingphdcurriculum