Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BackgroundThe number of randomized controlled trials using auricular stimulation (AS) such as transauricular vagus nerve stimulation, or other auricular electrostimulation or auricular acupuncture or acupressure, in experimental and clinical settings, has increased markedly over the last three decad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Hua, Mike Cummings, Miriam Bernatik, Benno Brinkhaus, Taras Usichenko, Joanna Dietzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1227858/full
_version_ 1797729009890492416
author Kevin Hua
Mike Cummings
Miriam Bernatik
Benno Brinkhaus
Taras Usichenko
Taras Usichenko
Joanna Dietzel
author_facet Kevin Hua
Mike Cummings
Miriam Bernatik
Benno Brinkhaus
Taras Usichenko
Taras Usichenko
Joanna Dietzel
author_sort Kevin Hua
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe number of randomized controlled trials using auricular stimulation (AS) such as transauricular vagus nerve stimulation, or other auricular electrostimulation or auricular acupuncture or acupressure, in experimental and clinical settings, has increased markedly over the last three decades. This systematic review focusses on cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation.Methods and analysisThe following databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ISI Web of Science, and Scopus Database. RCTs were reviewed that had been published in English and European languages. Data collection and analysis was conducted by two reviewers independently. Quality and risk assessment of included studies was performed and the meta-analysis of the effect of the most frequently assessed biomarkers.ResultsAltogether, 78 trials were included. 38 studies assessed heart rate (HR), 19 studies analyzed heart rate variability (HRV), 31 studies analyzed blood pressure (BP) and 7 studies were identified that measured oxygen saturation (O2), 2 studies on baroreflex sensitivity and 2 studies on skin conductance were evaluated in this review. 26 studies contained continuous data and were eligible for meta-analysis, 50 trials reported non continuous data and were evaluated descriptively. The overall quality of the studies was moderate to low. AS leads to a significant reduction of HR, the changes though were not considered an adverse reaction. Furthermore, when looking at HRV, AS was able to reduce the LF/HF ratio significantly compared to control procedures. No other cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, baroreflex sensitivity) were changed significantly. AS produced only minor side effects in all trials.ConclusionAS can lead to clinically safe reduction of HR and changes in the LF/HF ratio of the HRV, which is presumably via an increase in vagal activity. More research is needed to clarify whether AS can be used to modulate tachycardia or indications with autonomic imbalance.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=231885 PROSPERO, ID CRD42021231885.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:22:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-097234fb478d430fb58cebe9ce3df669
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:22:39Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-097234fb478d430fb58cebe9ce3df6692023-09-01T14:10:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2023-09-011710.3389/fnins.2023.12278581227858Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trialsKevin Hua0Mike Cummings1Miriam Bernatik2Benno Brinkhaus3Taras Usichenko4Taras Usichenko5Joanna Dietzel6Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - University Medicine, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBritish Medical Acupuncture Society, London, United KingdomInternational Society for Chinese Medicine, Munich, GermanyInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - University Medicine, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment for Anesthesiology, University Hospital Greifswald, Greifswald, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - University Medicine, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyBackgroundThe number of randomized controlled trials using auricular stimulation (AS) such as transauricular vagus nerve stimulation, or other auricular electrostimulation or auricular acupuncture or acupressure, in experimental and clinical settings, has increased markedly over the last three decades. This systematic review focusses on cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation.Methods and analysisThe following databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ISI Web of Science, and Scopus Database. RCTs were reviewed that had been published in English and European languages. Data collection and analysis was conducted by two reviewers independently. Quality and risk assessment of included studies was performed and the meta-analysis of the effect of the most frequently assessed biomarkers.ResultsAltogether, 78 trials were included. 38 studies assessed heart rate (HR), 19 studies analyzed heart rate variability (HRV), 31 studies analyzed blood pressure (BP) and 7 studies were identified that measured oxygen saturation (O2), 2 studies on baroreflex sensitivity and 2 studies on skin conductance were evaluated in this review. 26 studies contained continuous data and were eligible for meta-analysis, 50 trials reported non continuous data and were evaluated descriptively. The overall quality of the studies was moderate to low. AS leads to a significant reduction of HR, the changes though were not considered an adverse reaction. Furthermore, when looking at HRV, AS was able to reduce the LF/HF ratio significantly compared to control procedures. No other cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, baroreflex sensitivity) were changed significantly. AS produced only minor side effects in all trials.ConclusionAS can lead to clinically safe reduction of HR and changes in the LF/HF ratio of the HRV, which is presumably via an increase in vagal activity. More research is needed to clarify whether AS can be used to modulate tachycardia or indications with autonomic imbalance.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=231885 PROSPERO, ID CRD42021231885.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1227858/fullauricular acupunctureauricular stimulationcardiovascularrandomized controlled trialssystematic reviewtransauricular vagus nerve stimulation
spellingShingle Kevin Hua
Mike Cummings
Miriam Bernatik
Benno Brinkhaus
Taras Usichenko
Taras Usichenko
Joanna Dietzel
Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
Frontiers in Neuroscience
auricular acupuncture
auricular stimulation
cardiovascular
randomized controlled trials
systematic review
transauricular vagus nerve stimulation
title Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_full Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_fullStr Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_short Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_sort cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
topic auricular acupuncture
auricular stimulation
cardiovascular
randomized controlled trials
systematic review
transauricular vagus nerve stimulation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1227858/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinhua cardiovasculareffectsofauricularstimulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT mikecummings cardiovasculareffectsofauricularstimulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT miriambernatik cardiovasculareffectsofauricularstimulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT bennobrinkhaus cardiovasculareffectsofauricularstimulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT tarasusichenko cardiovasculareffectsofauricularstimulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT tarasusichenko cardiovasculareffectsofauricularstimulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT joannadietzel cardiovasculareffectsofauricularstimulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials