Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response Criteria

(1) Background: Transient increase in volume of vestibular schwannomas (VS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is common and complicates differentiation between treatment-related changes (pseudoprogression, PP) and tumor recurrence (progressive disease, PD). (2) Methods: Patients with unilateral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Rueß, Betina Schütz, Eren Celik, Christian Baues, Stephanie T. Jünger, Volker Neuschmelting, Alexandra Hellerbach, Markus Eichner, Martin Kocher, Maximilian I. Ruge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/5/1496
_version_ 1797615628801015808
author Daniel Rueß
Betina Schütz
Eren Celik
Christian Baues
Stephanie T. Jünger
Volker Neuschmelting
Alexandra Hellerbach
Markus Eichner
Martin Kocher
Maximilian I. Ruge
author_facet Daniel Rueß
Betina Schütz
Eren Celik
Christian Baues
Stephanie T. Jünger
Volker Neuschmelting
Alexandra Hellerbach
Markus Eichner
Martin Kocher
Maximilian I. Ruge
author_sort Daniel Rueß
collection DOAJ
description (1) Background: Transient increase in volume of vestibular schwannomas (VS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is common and complicates differentiation between treatment-related changes (pseudoprogression, PP) and tumor recurrence (progressive disease, PD). (2) Methods: Patients with unilateral VS (n = 63) underwent single fraction robotic-guided SRS. Volume changes were classified according to existing RANO criteria. A new response type, PP, with a >20% transient increase in volume was defined and divided into early (within the first 12 months) and late (>12 months) occurrence. (3) Results: The median age was 56 (range: 20–82) years, the median initial tumor volume was 1.5 (range: 0.1–8.6) cm<sup>3</sup>. The median radiological and clinical follow-up time was 66 (range: 24–103) months. Partial response was observed in 36% (n = 23), stable disease in 35% (n = 22) and PP in 29% (n = 18) of patients. The latter occurred early (16%, n = 10) or late (13%, n = 8). Using these criteria, no case of PD was observed. (4) Conclusion: Any volume increase after SRS for vs. assumed to be PD turned out to be early or late PP. Therefore, we propose modifying RANO criteria for SRS of VS, which may affect the management of vs. during follow-up in favor of further observation.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:29:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0980f98eb2de4a7f9c9e7b8c7604d871
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:29:23Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-0980f98eb2de4a7f9c9e7b8c7604d8712023-11-17T07:24:56ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942023-02-01155149610.3390/cancers15051496Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response CriteriaDaniel Rueß0Betina Schütz1Eren Celik2Christian Baues3Stephanie T. Jünger4Volker Neuschmelting5Alexandra Hellerbach6Markus Eichner7Martin Kocher8Maximilian I. Ruge9Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of General Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of General Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany(1) Background: Transient increase in volume of vestibular schwannomas (VS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is common and complicates differentiation between treatment-related changes (pseudoprogression, PP) and tumor recurrence (progressive disease, PD). (2) Methods: Patients with unilateral VS (n = 63) underwent single fraction robotic-guided SRS. Volume changes were classified according to existing RANO criteria. A new response type, PP, with a >20% transient increase in volume was defined and divided into early (within the first 12 months) and late (>12 months) occurrence. (3) Results: The median age was 56 (range: 20–82) years, the median initial tumor volume was 1.5 (range: 0.1–8.6) cm<sup>3</sup>. The median radiological and clinical follow-up time was 66 (range: 24–103) months. Partial response was observed in 36% (n = 23), stable disease in 35% (n = 22) and PP in 29% (n = 18) of patients. The latter occurred early (16%, n = 10) or late (13%, n = 8). Using these criteria, no case of PD was observed. (4) Conclusion: Any volume increase after SRS for vs. assumed to be PD turned out to be early or late PP. Therefore, we propose modifying RANO criteria for SRS of VS, which may affect the management of vs. during follow-up in favor of further observation.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/5/1496radiosurgeryvestibular schwannomaCyberknife<sup>®</sup>skull base tumorsRANO criteria
spellingShingle Daniel Rueß
Betina Schütz
Eren Celik
Christian Baues
Stephanie T. Jünger
Volker Neuschmelting
Alexandra Hellerbach
Markus Eichner
Martin Kocher
Maximilian I. Ruge
Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response Criteria
Cancers
radiosurgery
vestibular schwannoma
Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>
skull base tumors
RANO criteria
title Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response Criteria
title_full Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response Criteria
title_fullStr Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response Criteria
title_short Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: Proposal for New Response Criteria
title_sort pseudoprogression of vestibular schwannoma after stereotactic radiosurgery with cyberknife sup r sup proposal for new response criteria
topic radiosurgery
vestibular schwannoma
Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>
skull base tumors
RANO criteria
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/5/1496
work_keys_str_mv AT danielrueß pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT betinaschutz pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT erencelik pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT christianbaues pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT stephanietjunger pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT volkerneuschmelting pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT alexandrahellerbach pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT markuseichner pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT martinkocher pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria
AT maximilianiruge pseudoprogressionofvestibularschwannomaafterstereotacticradiosurgerywithcyberknifesupsupproposalfornewresponsecriteria