Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study

Context: Edentulous patients often complain about the instability of mandibular denture. To overcome that, implant-supported overdentures (IODs) have been applied as a good prosthetic option. Aims: The current study compared the changes in retentive force and patterns of surface wear of nylon rings...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sajjy Upinder, Balvinder Singh Saluja, Gaurav Gupta, Bhupinder Kaur, Gurjot Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2019;volume=11;issue=2;spage=65;epage=70;aulast=Upinder
_version_ 1818534840524341248
author Sajjy Upinder
Balvinder Singh Saluja
Gaurav Gupta
Bhupinder Kaur
Gurjot Singh
author_facet Sajjy Upinder
Balvinder Singh Saluja
Gaurav Gupta
Bhupinder Kaur
Gurjot Singh
author_sort Sajjy Upinder
collection DOAJ
description Context: Edentulous patients often complain about the instability of mandibular denture. To overcome that, implant-supported overdentures (IODs) have been applied as a good prosthetic option. Aims: The current study compared the changes in retentive force and patterns of surface wear of nylon rings of two stud attachments (ball and locator) upon cyclic loading. Subjects and Methods: Two implant analogs were fixed parallel to each other, 22 mm apart, in custom-made rectangular blocks for each attachment system. Ten nylon inserts of each attachment system were tested. Universal testing machine was used to measure the retentive force, and a low-value fatigue testing machine was used for cyclic loading of 2500 insertion–removal cycles. Surface changes of the components were evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical Analysis Used: Paired Student's t-test was used to determine groups that were statistically significant. Results: The greatest retention loss rate, i.e., the difference between the initial retentive force and final retentive force was observed in the ball attachment (6.20 N) followed by locator attachment (3.70 N). The results were found to be statistically significant (d ≤ 0.001**). Upon SEM analysis, the nylon inserts of ball attachment revealed more surface wear compared to that of locator attachment. Conclusions: For greater retention and longer function, locator overdenture attachment should be preferred for implant overdentures over ball attachment.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:16:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-09a2eea20fcd4f1799b97be1906629ad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-4003
2231-2293
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:16:50Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dental Sciences
spelling doaj.art-09a2eea20fcd4f1799b97be1906629ad2022-12-22T00:55:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Sciences0976-40032231-22932019-01-01112657010.4103/IJDS.IJDS_96_18Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro studySajjy UpinderBalvinder Singh SalujaGaurav GuptaBhupinder KaurGurjot SinghContext: Edentulous patients often complain about the instability of mandibular denture. To overcome that, implant-supported overdentures (IODs) have been applied as a good prosthetic option. Aims: The current study compared the changes in retentive force and patterns of surface wear of nylon rings of two stud attachments (ball and locator) upon cyclic loading. Subjects and Methods: Two implant analogs were fixed parallel to each other, 22 mm apart, in custom-made rectangular blocks for each attachment system. Ten nylon inserts of each attachment system were tested. Universal testing machine was used to measure the retentive force, and a low-value fatigue testing machine was used for cyclic loading of 2500 insertion–removal cycles. Surface changes of the components were evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical Analysis Used: Paired Student's t-test was used to determine groups that were statistically significant. Results: The greatest retention loss rate, i.e., the difference between the initial retentive force and final retentive force was observed in the ball attachment (6.20 N) followed by locator attachment (3.70 N). The results were found to be statistically significant (d ≤ 0.001**). Upon SEM analysis, the nylon inserts of ball attachment revealed more surface wear compared to that of locator attachment. Conclusions: For greater retention and longer function, locator overdenture attachment should be preferred for implant overdentures over ball attachment.http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2019;volume=11;issue=2;spage=65;epage=70;aulast=UpinderOverdenture attachmentretentionsurface wear
spellingShingle Sajjy Upinder
Balvinder Singh Saluja
Gaurav Gupta
Bhupinder Kaur
Gurjot Singh
Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study
Indian Journal of Dental Sciences
Overdenture attachment
retention
surface wear
title Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures an in vitro study
topic Overdenture attachment
retention
surface wear
url http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2019;volume=11;issue=2;spage=65;epage=70;aulast=Upinder
work_keys_str_mv AT sajjyupinder comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy
AT balvindersinghsaluja comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy
AT gauravgupta comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy
AT bhupinderkaur comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy
AT gurjotsingh comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy