Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study
Context: Edentulous patients often complain about the instability of mandibular denture. To overcome that, implant-supported overdentures (IODs) have been applied as a good prosthetic option. Aims: The current study compared the changes in retentive force and patterns of surface wear of nylon rings...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2019;volume=11;issue=2;spage=65;epage=70;aulast=Upinder |
_version_ | 1818534840524341248 |
---|---|
author | Sajjy Upinder Balvinder Singh Saluja Gaurav Gupta Bhupinder Kaur Gurjot Singh |
author_facet | Sajjy Upinder Balvinder Singh Saluja Gaurav Gupta Bhupinder Kaur Gurjot Singh |
author_sort | Sajjy Upinder |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Context: Edentulous patients often complain about the instability of mandibular denture. To overcome that, implant-supported overdentures (IODs) have been applied as a good prosthetic option. Aims: The current study compared the changes in retentive force and patterns of surface wear of nylon rings of two stud attachments (ball and locator) upon cyclic loading. Subjects and Methods: Two implant analogs were fixed parallel to each other, 22 mm apart, in custom-made rectangular blocks for each attachment system. Ten nylon inserts of each attachment system were tested. Universal testing machine was used to measure the retentive force, and a low-value fatigue testing machine was used for cyclic loading of 2500 insertion–removal cycles. Surface changes of the components were evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical Analysis Used: Paired Student's t-test was used to determine groups that were statistically significant. Results: The greatest retention loss rate, i.e., the difference between the initial retentive force and final retentive force was observed in the ball attachment (6.20 N) followed by locator attachment (3.70 N). The results were found to be statistically significant (d ≤ 0.001**). Upon SEM analysis, the nylon inserts of ball attachment revealed more surface wear compared to that of locator attachment. Conclusions: For greater retention and longer function, locator overdenture attachment should be preferred for implant overdentures over ball attachment. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:16:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-09a2eea20fcd4f1799b97be1906629ad |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0976-4003 2231-2293 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:16:50Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Dental Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-09a2eea20fcd4f1799b97be1906629ad2022-12-22T00:55:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Sciences0976-40032231-22932019-01-01112657010.4103/IJDS.IJDS_96_18Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro studySajjy UpinderBalvinder Singh SalujaGaurav GuptaBhupinder KaurGurjot SinghContext: Edentulous patients often complain about the instability of mandibular denture. To overcome that, implant-supported overdentures (IODs) have been applied as a good prosthetic option. Aims: The current study compared the changes in retentive force and patterns of surface wear of nylon rings of two stud attachments (ball and locator) upon cyclic loading. Subjects and Methods: Two implant analogs were fixed parallel to each other, 22 mm apart, in custom-made rectangular blocks for each attachment system. Ten nylon inserts of each attachment system were tested. Universal testing machine was used to measure the retentive force, and a low-value fatigue testing machine was used for cyclic loading of 2500 insertion–removal cycles. Surface changes of the components were evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical Analysis Used: Paired Student's t-test was used to determine groups that were statistically significant. Results: The greatest retention loss rate, i.e., the difference between the initial retentive force and final retentive force was observed in the ball attachment (6.20 N) followed by locator attachment (3.70 N). The results were found to be statistically significant (d ≤ 0.001**). Upon SEM analysis, the nylon inserts of ball attachment revealed more surface wear compared to that of locator attachment. Conclusions: For greater retention and longer function, locator overdenture attachment should be preferred for implant overdentures over ball attachment.http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2019;volume=11;issue=2;spage=65;epage=70;aulast=UpinderOverdenture attachmentretentionsurface wear |
spellingShingle | Sajjy Upinder Balvinder Singh Saluja Gaurav Gupta Bhupinder Kaur Gurjot Singh Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study Indian Journal of Dental Sciences Overdenture attachment retention surface wear |
title | Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparison of changes in retentive force and wear pattern of two stud attachments for implant overdentures an in vitro study |
topic | Overdenture attachment retention surface wear |
url | http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2019;volume=11;issue=2;spage=65;epage=70;aulast=Upinder |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sajjyupinder comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy AT balvindersinghsaluja comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy AT gauravgupta comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy AT bhupinderkaur comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy AT gurjotsingh comparisonofchangesinretentiveforceandwearpatternoftwostudattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesaninvitrostudy |