Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
Asrafi Rizki Gatam,1 Luthfi Gatam,1 Harmantya Mahadhipta,2 Ajiantoro Ajiantoro,3 Omar Luthfi,4 Dina Aprilya5 1Orthopaedic Spine Division, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Orthopaedic Spine Division, Tangerang General Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 3Orthopaedic Spine Division, Premier B...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2021-11-01
|
| Series: | Orthopedic Research and Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/unilateral-biportal-endoscopic-lumbar-interbody-fusion-a-technical-not-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-ORR |
| _version_ | 1818568596322779136 |
|---|---|
| author | Gatam AR Gatam L Mahadhipta H Ajiantoro A Luthfi O Aprilya D |
| author_facet | Gatam AR Gatam L Mahadhipta H Ajiantoro A Luthfi O Aprilya D |
| author_sort | Gatam AR |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Asrafi Rizki Gatam,1 Luthfi Gatam,1 Harmantya Mahadhipta,2 Ajiantoro Ajiantoro,3 Omar Luthfi,4 Dina Aprilya5 1Orthopaedic Spine Division, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Orthopaedic Spine Division, Tangerang General Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 3Orthopaedic Spine Division, Premier Bintaro Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 4Orthopedic Spine Division, Adhyaksa General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 5Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Dina AprilyaOrthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaEmail dina.cia.aprilya@gmail.comBackground: In the past few decades, the minimally invasive technique for spine surgery has developed extensively from the scope of decompression until fusion surgeries to reduce damages to the normal anatomical structure. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is one of the fusion options which is readily available without a sophisticated minimal invasive instrument. Our aim is to introduce ULIF experience in our center and comparing the result with conventional minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 145 lumbar spondylolisthesis cases that underwent fusion surgery with either ULIF or the conventional MIS-TLIF. All of the patients were observed within a 12-month follow-up period to evaluate the back pain and leg pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and fusion rate.Results: The leg pain VAS was similarly improved in both groups. ULIF has a significant back pain improvement on direct post operation and at the 3-months follow-up (p value 0.032 and 0.046 respectively). ULIF group also had a significantly better improvement of ODI scores on the early post-operative period (p=0.045). However, both groups similarly showed improvement of ODI score and the SF-36 at the 3-, 6-, and 12- months follow up.Conclusion: Full endoscopic fusion surgery with ULIF offers a comparable long-term outcome and a significantly better back pain VAS reduction in short-term follow up compared to the conventional MIS-TLIF. ULIF, with further improvement, can be the next gold standard in managing degenerative lumbar spine conditions.Keywords: lumbar spine, degenerative spondylolisthesis, minimally invasive spine surgery, lumbar interbody fusion, unilateral biportal endoscopy, full endoscopic spine surgery, MISS |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:37:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-09a8072e9c6e4a97ba463511e6f1b748 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1179-1462 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:37:21Z |
| publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Orthopedic Research and Reviews |
| spelling | doaj.art-09a8072e9c6e4a97ba463511e6f1b7482022-12-21T23:13:20ZengDove Medical PressOrthopedic Research and Reviews1179-14622021-11-01Volume 1322923970863Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive FusionGatam ARGatam LMahadhipta HAjiantoro ALuthfi OAprilya DAsrafi Rizki Gatam,1 Luthfi Gatam,1 Harmantya Mahadhipta,2 Ajiantoro Ajiantoro,3 Omar Luthfi,4 Dina Aprilya5 1Orthopaedic Spine Division, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Orthopaedic Spine Division, Tangerang General Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 3Orthopaedic Spine Division, Premier Bintaro Hospital, Banten, Indonesia; 4Orthopedic Spine Division, Adhyaksa General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 5Orthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Dina AprilyaOrthopedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaEmail dina.cia.aprilya@gmail.comBackground: In the past few decades, the minimally invasive technique for spine surgery has developed extensively from the scope of decompression until fusion surgeries to reduce damages to the normal anatomical structure. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is one of the fusion options which is readily available without a sophisticated minimal invasive instrument. Our aim is to introduce ULIF experience in our center and comparing the result with conventional minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 145 lumbar spondylolisthesis cases that underwent fusion surgery with either ULIF or the conventional MIS-TLIF. All of the patients were observed within a 12-month follow-up period to evaluate the back pain and leg pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and fusion rate.Results: The leg pain VAS was similarly improved in both groups. ULIF has a significant back pain improvement on direct post operation and at the 3-months follow-up (p value 0.032 and 0.046 respectively). ULIF group also had a significantly better improvement of ODI scores on the early post-operative period (p=0.045). However, both groups similarly showed improvement of ODI score and the SF-36 at the 3-, 6-, and 12- months follow up.Conclusion: Full endoscopic fusion surgery with ULIF offers a comparable long-term outcome and a significantly better back pain VAS reduction in short-term follow up compared to the conventional MIS-TLIF. ULIF, with further improvement, can be the next gold standard in managing degenerative lumbar spine conditions.Keywords: lumbar spine, degenerative spondylolisthesis, minimally invasive spine surgery, lumbar interbody fusion, unilateral biportal endoscopy, full endoscopic spine surgery, MISShttps://www.dovepress.com/unilateral-biportal-endoscopic-lumbar-interbody-fusion-a-technical-not-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-ORRlumbar spinedegenerative spondylolisthesisminimally invasive spine surgerylumbar interbody fusionunilateral biportal endoscopyfull endoscopic spine surgery |
| spellingShingle | Gatam AR Gatam L Mahadhipta H Ajiantoro A Luthfi O Aprilya D Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion Orthopedic Research and Reviews lumbar spine degenerative spondylolisthesis minimally invasive spine surgery lumbar interbody fusion unilateral biportal endoscopy full endoscopic spine surgery |
| title | Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion |
| title_full | Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion |
| title_fullStr | Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion |
| title_full_unstemmed | Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion |
| title_short | Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion |
| title_sort | unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion a technical note and an outcome comparison with the conventional minimally invasive fusion |
| topic | lumbar spine degenerative spondylolisthesis minimally invasive spine surgery lumbar interbody fusion unilateral biportal endoscopy full endoscopic spine surgery |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/unilateral-biportal-endoscopic-lumbar-interbody-fusion-a-technical-not-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-ORR |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gatamar unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion AT gataml unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion AT mahadhiptah unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion AT ajiantoroa unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion AT luthfio unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion AT aprilyad unilateralbiportalendoscopiclumbarinterbodyfusionatechnicalnoteandanoutcomecomparisonwiththeconventionalminimallyinvasivefusion |