Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility.
The functional morphology of sauropod dinosaur long necks has been studied extensively, with virtual approaches yielding results that are difficult to obtain with actual fossils, due to their extreme fragility and size. However, analyses on virtual fossils have been questioned on several of their pr...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227537 |
| _version_ | 1818916398873706496 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniel Vidal Pedro Mocho Adrián Páramo José Luis Sanz Francisco Ortega |
| author_facet | Daniel Vidal Pedro Mocho Adrián Páramo José Luis Sanz Francisco Ortega |
| author_sort | Daniel Vidal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The functional morphology of sauropod dinosaur long necks has been studied extensively, with virtual approaches yielding results that are difficult to obtain with actual fossils, due to their extreme fragility and size. However, analyses on virtual fossils have been questioned on several of their premises, such as the ability to accurately reconstruct intervertebral tissue with only skeletal data; or whether zygapophyseal overlap can be used to determine the limits of range of motion, since some extreme neck poses in extant giraffes have been claimed not to retain any zygapophyseal overlap. We compared articulation and range of motion in extant giraffes with the exceptionally well-preserved and complete basally branching eusauropod Spinophorosaurus nigerensis from the Middle (?) Jurassic of Niger, under the same virtual paleontology protocols. We examined the articulation and range of motion on grown and young specimens of both Spinophorosaurus and giraffes in order to record any potential changes during ontogeny. Also, the postures of virtual giraffes were compared with previously published data from living animals in the wild. Our analyses show that: (i) articulation of virtual bones in osteologically neutral pose (ONP) does enable accurate prediction of the amount of inter-vertebral space in giraffes and, roughly, in Spinophorosaurus; (ii) even the most extreme neck postures attained by living giraffes in the wild do not require to disarticulate cervical vertebrae; (iii) both living giraffes and Spinophorosaurus have large intervertebral spaces between their cervical centra in early ontogenetical stages, which decrease as ontogeny advances; and (iv) that grown specimens have a greater osteological range of motion in living giraffes and Spinophorosaurus. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T00:17:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-09ae126efa1d4a4b8c5297aed5a33331 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T00:17:33Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-09ae126efa1d4a4b8c5297aed5a333312022-12-21T20:00:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022753710.1371/journal.pone.0227537Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility.Daniel VidalPedro MochoAdrián PáramoJosé Luis SanzFrancisco OrtegaThe functional morphology of sauropod dinosaur long necks has been studied extensively, with virtual approaches yielding results that are difficult to obtain with actual fossils, due to their extreme fragility and size. However, analyses on virtual fossils have been questioned on several of their premises, such as the ability to accurately reconstruct intervertebral tissue with only skeletal data; or whether zygapophyseal overlap can be used to determine the limits of range of motion, since some extreme neck poses in extant giraffes have been claimed not to retain any zygapophyseal overlap. We compared articulation and range of motion in extant giraffes with the exceptionally well-preserved and complete basally branching eusauropod Spinophorosaurus nigerensis from the Middle (?) Jurassic of Niger, under the same virtual paleontology protocols. We examined the articulation and range of motion on grown and young specimens of both Spinophorosaurus and giraffes in order to record any potential changes during ontogeny. Also, the postures of virtual giraffes were compared with previously published data from living animals in the wild. Our analyses show that: (i) articulation of virtual bones in osteologically neutral pose (ONP) does enable accurate prediction of the amount of inter-vertebral space in giraffes and, roughly, in Spinophorosaurus; (ii) even the most extreme neck postures attained by living giraffes in the wild do not require to disarticulate cervical vertebrae; (iii) both living giraffes and Spinophorosaurus have large intervertebral spaces between their cervical centra in early ontogenetical stages, which decrease as ontogeny advances; and (iv) that grown specimens have a greater osteological range of motion in living giraffes and Spinophorosaurus.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227537 |
| spellingShingle | Daniel Vidal Pedro Mocho Adrián Páramo José Luis Sanz Francisco Ortega Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility. PLoS ONE |
| title | Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility. |
| title_full | Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility. |
| title_fullStr | Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility. |
| title_short | Ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility. |
| title_sort | ontogenetic similarities between giraffe and sauropod neck osteological mobility |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227537 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danielvidal ontogeneticsimilaritiesbetweengiraffeandsauropodneckosteologicalmobility AT pedromocho ontogeneticsimilaritiesbetweengiraffeandsauropodneckosteologicalmobility AT adrianparamo ontogeneticsimilaritiesbetweengiraffeandsauropodneckosteologicalmobility AT joseluissanz ontogeneticsimilaritiesbetweengiraffeandsauropodneckosteologicalmobility AT franciscoortega ontogeneticsimilaritiesbetweengiraffeandsauropodneckosteologicalmobility |