Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in Africa

Small-size enterprises drying cassava in Africa mostly use fixed-bed dryers or pneumatic dryers. The objective of this study was to determine which of those two dryers is the best choice for this operation. Energy performance, product quality and costs were measured and analysed using a comparative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcelo Precoppe, Gregory Afra Komlaga, Arnaud Chapuis, Joachim Müller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7863
_version_ 1827702735259041792
author Marcelo Precoppe
Gregory Afra Komlaga
Arnaud Chapuis
Joachim Müller
author_facet Marcelo Precoppe
Gregory Afra Komlaga
Arnaud Chapuis
Joachim Müller
author_sort Marcelo Precoppe
collection DOAJ
description Small-size enterprises drying cassava in Africa mostly use fixed-bed dryers or pneumatic dryers. The objective of this study was to determine which of those two dryers is the best choice for this operation. Energy performance, product quality and costs were measured and analysed using a comparative experiment design. Each dryer was considered as a treatment and experiments were performed in quintuplicate at a cassava processing small-size enterprise in Ghana. The energy performance of the pneumatic dryer was superior because of the better contact between the cassava grits and the drying air, resulting in greater heat and mass transfer. The cassava flour obtained from the fixed-bed dryer had a higher Whiteness Index, but the same level of lightness, and the staff responsible for managing product quality was not able to visually distinguish them. As a result of the pneumatic dryer’s better energy performance, its operating cost was lower. The capital cost of this dryer was higher, but to recover the additional investment only 194 days of operation were needed. Therefore, it was concluded that pneumatic dryers are a better choice of equipment for cassava drying by small-size enterprises in Africa.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:02:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-09ae1779a6f74b55a5bda627d1525ccd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:02:43Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-09ae1779a6f74b55a5bda627d1525ccd2023-11-20T19:59:56ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-11-011021786310.3390/app10217863Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in AfricaMarcelo Precoppe0Gregory Afra Komlaga1Arnaud Chapuis2Joachim Müller3Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UKFood Research Institute, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Gulf Street Adamafio Link, Accra GA-107-2878, GhanaCIRAD, UMR Qualisud, 34398 Montpellier, FranceTropics and Subtropics Group, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, 70599 Stuttgart, GermanySmall-size enterprises drying cassava in Africa mostly use fixed-bed dryers or pneumatic dryers. The objective of this study was to determine which of those two dryers is the best choice for this operation. Energy performance, product quality and costs were measured and analysed using a comparative experiment design. Each dryer was considered as a treatment and experiments were performed in quintuplicate at a cassava processing small-size enterprise in Ghana. The energy performance of the pneumatic dryer was superior because of the better contact between the cassava grits and the drying air, resulting in greater heat and mass transfer. The cassava flour obtained from the fixed-bed dryer had a higher Whiteness Index, but the same level of lightness, and the staff responsible for managing product quality was not able to visually distinguish them. As a result of the pneumatic dryer’s better energy performance, its operating cost was lower. The capital cost of this dryer was higher, but to recover the additional investment only 194 days of operation were needed. Therefore, it was concluded that pneumatic dryers are a better choice of equipment for cassava drying by small-size enterprises in Africa.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7863convection dryerpneumatic dryerflash dryerfixed-bed dryerflatbed dryerenergy efficiency
spellingShingle Marcelo Precoppe
Gregory Afra Komlaga
Arnaud Chapuis
Joachim Müller
Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in Africa
Applied Sciences
convection dryer
pneumatic dryer
flash dryer
fixed-bed dryer
flatbed dryer
energy efficiency
title Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in Africa
title_full Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in Africa
title_fullStr Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in Africa
title_short Comparative Study between Current Practices on Cassava Drying by Small-Size Enterprises in Africa
title_sort comparative study between current practices on cassava drying by small size enterprises in africa
topic convection dryer
pneumatic dryer
flash dryer
fixed-bed dryer
flatbed dryer
energy efficiency
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7863
work_keys_str_mv AT marceloprecoppe comparativestudybetweencurrentpracticesoncassavadryingbysmallsizeenterprisesinafrica
AT gregoryafrakomlaga comparativestudybetweencurrentpracticesoncassavadryingbysmallsizeenterprisesinafrica
AT arnaudchapuis comparativestudybetweencurrentpracticesoncassavadryingbysmallsizeenterprisesinafrica
AT joachimmuller comparativestudybetweencurrentpracticesoncassavadryingbysmallsizeenterprisesinafrica