Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native Plants

Plants native to the United States, defined as those being present before European settlement, have aesthetic and environmental benefits. In 2018, only 10% of plant sales were native plants, a plant category that tends to be underrepresented in many residential and commercial landscapes. Although ea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariana P. Torres, Alicia L. Rihn, Susan S. Barton, Bridget K. Behe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) 2024-02-01
Series:HortTechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/34/2/article-p153.xml
_version_ 1797299865182535680
author Ariana P. Torres
Alicia L. Rihn
Susan S. Barton
Bridget K. Behe
author_facet Ariana P. Torres
Alicia L. Rihn
Susan S. Barton
Bridget K. Behe
author_sort Ariana P. Torres
collection DOAJ
description Plants native to the United States, defined as those being present before European settlement, have aesthetic and environmental benefits. In 2018, only 10% of plant sales were native plants, a plant category that tends to be underrepresented in many residential and commercial landscapes. Although earlier research indicated that consumers find native plants less aesthetically appealing relative to introduced species, more recent research reported a growing demand for native plants. Thus, a better understanding of consumer perceptions would facilitate their marketing. We used an online survey of 1824 participants representing five geographic regions (West, Southwest, Midwest, Southeast, and Northwest) to classify adopters based on their purchase of native plants. A double-hurdle model was used to estimate factors influencing purchasing native plants among US homeowners, and the factors influencing the amount spent on native plants in 2021. Demographically, metropolitan, college-educated, and younger participants were more likely to be native plant adopters; they also spent 80% more on plants compared with nonnative plant adopters. More native plant adopters agreed that native plants were better for the environment than exotic plants (68%), are readily available in their area (67%), and are better adapted to difficult sites (75%). Marketing efforts should capitalize on the environmental benefits to stimulate purchases.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:57:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-09b189816a254ca0aeb183e0e9598e3d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1943-7714
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:57:51Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)
record_format Article
series HortTechnology
spelling doaj.art-09b189816a254ca0aeb183e0e9598e3d2024-02-22T16:57:47ZengAmerican Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)HortTechnology1943-77142024-02-01342https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05345-23Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native PlantsAriana P. Torres0Alicia L. Rihn1Susan S. Barton2Bridget K. Behe3Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture and Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue UniversityDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of TennesseeDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of DelawareDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State UniversityPlants native to the United States, defined as those being present before European settlement, have aesthetic and environmental benefits. In 2018, only 10% of plant sales were native plants, a plant category that tends to be underrepresented in many residential and commercial landscapes. Although earlier research indicated that consumers find native plants less aesthetically appealing relative to introduced species, more recent research reported a growing demand for native plants. Thus, a better understanding of consumer perceptions would facilitate their marketing. We used an online survey of 1824 participants representing five geographic regions (West, Southwest, Midwest, Southeast, and Northwest) to classify adopters based on their purchase of native plants. A double-hurdle model was used to estimate factors influencing purchasing native plants among US homeowners, and the factors influencing the amount spent on native plants in 2021. Demographically, metropolitan, college-educated, and younger participants were more likely to be native plant adopters; they also spent 80% more on plants compared with nonnative plant adopters. More native plant adopters agreed that native plants were better for the environment than exotic plants (68%), are readily available in their area (67%), and are better adapted to difficult sites (75%). Marketing efforts should capitalize on the environmental benefits to stimulate purchases.https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/34/2/article-p153.xmleducationenvironmentnativesprice premium
spellingShingle Ariana P. Torres
Alicia L. Rihn
Susan S. Barton
Bridget K. Behe
Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native Plants
HortTechnology
education
environment
natives
price premium
title Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native Plants
title_full Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native Plants
title_fullStr Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native Plants
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native Plants
title_short Perceptions and Socioeconomic Status Influence Purchases of Native Plants
title_sort perceptions and socioeconomic status influence purchases of native plants
topic education
environment
natives
price premium
url https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/34/2/article-p153.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT arianaptorres perceptionsandsocioeconomicstatusinfluencepurchasesofnativeplants
AT alicialrihn perceptionsandsocioeconomicstatusinfluencepurchasesofnativeplants
AT susansbarton perceptionsandsocioeconomicstatusinfluencepurchasesofnativeplants
AT bridgetkbehe perceptionsandsocioeconomicstatusinfluencepurchasesofnativeplants