Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers
Each year, there are an estimated 550 000 diagnoses of bladder cancer worldwide, and almost 200 000 deaths from bladder cancer. The need for frequent follow-up, including invasive procedures like cystoscopy, repetitive procedures like transurethral resection of bladder tumors and intravesical instil...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://siuj.org/index.php/siuj/article/view/58/1 |
| _version_ | 1797225053147889664 |
|---|---|
| author | Laura Maria Krabbe, Georgios Gakis, Yair Lotan |
| author_facet | Laura Maria Krabbe, Georgios Gakis, Yair Lotan |
| author_sort | Laura Maria Krabbe, Georgios Gakis, Yair Lotan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Each year, there are an estimated 550 000 diagnoses of bladder cancer worldwide, and almost 200 000 deaths from bladder cancer. The need for frequent follow-up, including invasive procedures like cystoscopy, repetitive procedures like transurethral resection of bladder tumors and intravesical instillation therapy in non-muscle invasive stages, as well as systemic treatment with or without radical local treatment in advanced stages, makes bladder cancer one of the most expensive cancers to treat. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers have the potential to fundamentally change bladder cancer treatment algorithms, which may result in improved patient comfort and oncological outcomes and may also decrease the socioeconomic burden of the disease. Intense research has resulted in the recent approval by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration of the first agent for this disease that targets a specific mutation (fibroblast-growth factor receptor). Yet, many areas of bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment have remained unchanged for decades, and this is only in part due to their therapeutic success. In order to integrate biomarkers into clinical practice patterns, specific considerations for the different disease stages and settings should be kept in mind. Especially in the setting of screening, work-up of hematuria, as well as surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, (urine-)biomarkers may prove useful. They must, however, demonstrate a high enough sensitivity to pick up a cancer diagnosis or recurrence, allow easy handling (preferably a point-of-care setting) and adequate cost–benefit relationships, while also providing additional information to a full work-up. A biomarker to identify patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who are in need of—and likely to respond to—neoadjuvant therapy would be very useful. In later disease, early detection of recurrence or progression, as well as biomarkers guiding treatment decisions between the available systemic agents, will be paramount for improved patient care. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T17:56:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-09c3d340120746f9a908ae4cc8bf2d39 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2563-6499 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T14:02:53Z |
| publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-09c3d340120746f9a908ae4cc8bf2d392024-04-03T11:05:22ZengMDPI AGSociété Internationale d’Urologie Journal2563-64992020-10-0111626710.48083//VUBV4988Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer BiomarkersLaura Maria Krabbe, Georgios Gakis, Yair LotanEach year, there are an estimated 550 000 diagnoses of bladder cancer worldwide, and almost 200 000 deaths from bladder cancer. The need for frequent follow-up, including invasive procedures like cystoscopy, repetitive procedures like transurethral resection of bladder tumors and intravesical instillation therapy in non-muscle invasive stages, as well as systemic treatment with or without radical local treatment in advanced stages, makes bladder cancer one of the most expensive cancers to treat. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers have the potential to fundamentally change bladder cancer treatment algorithms, which may result in improved patient comfort and oncological outcomes and may also decrease the socioeconomic burden of the disease. Intense research has resulted in the recent approval by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration of the first agent for this disease that targets a specific mutation (fibroblast-growth factor receptor). Yet, many areas of bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment have remained unchanged for decades, and this is only in part due to their therapeutic success. In order to integrate biomarkers into clinical practice patterns, specific considerations for the different disease stages and settings should be kept in mind. Especially in the setting of screening, work-up of hematuria, as well as surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, (urine-)biomarkers may prove useful. They must, however, demonstrate a high enough sensitivity to pick up a cancer diagnosis or recurrence, allow easy handling (preferably a point-of-care setting) and adequate cost–benefit relationships, while also providing additional information to a full work-up. A biomarker to identify patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who are in need of—and likely to respond to—neoadjuvant therapy would be very useful. In later disease, early detection of recurrence or progression, as well as biomarkers guiding treatment decisions between the available systemic agents, will be paramount for improved patient care.https://siuj.org/index.php/siuj/article/view/58/1biomarkersbladder cancermuscle invasive bladder cancernon-muscle invasive bladder cancerneoadjuvant therapyhematuriacystoscopyrisk stratificationclinical decision-making |
| spellingShingle | Laura Maria Krabbe, Georgios Gakis, Yair Lotan Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal biomarkers bladder cancer muscle invasive bladder cancer non-muscle invasive bladder cancer neoadjuvant therapy hematuria cystoscopy risk stratification clinical decision-making |
| title | Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers |
| title_full | Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers |
| title_fullStr | Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers |
| title_short | Clinical Utility of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers |
| title_sort | clinical utility of bladder cancer biomarkers |
| topic | biomarkers bladder cancer muscle invasive bladder cancer non-muscle invasive bladder cancer neoadjuvant therapy hematuria cystoscopy risk stratification clinical decision-making |
| url | https://siuj.org/index.php/siuj/article/view/58/1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lauramariakrabbegeorgiosgakisyairlotan clinicalutilityofbladdercancerbiomarkers |