Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14).
Nurses and other healthcare workers frequently experience belief conflict, one of the most important, new stress-related problems in both academic and clinical fields.In this study, using a sample of 1,683 nursing practitioners, we developed The Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4527743?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1818259598237237248 |
---|---|
author | Makoto Kyougoku Mutsumi Teraoka Noriko Masuda Mariko Ooura Yasushi Abe |
author_facet | Makoto Kyougoku Mutsumi Teraoka Noriko Masuda Mariko Ooura Yasushi Abe |
author_sort | Makoto Kyougoku |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Nurses and other healthcare workers frequently experience belief conflict, one of the most important, new stress-related problems in both academic and clinical fields.In this study, using a sample of 1,683 nursing practitioners, we developed The Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14), a new scale that assesses belief conflict in the healthcare field. Standard psychometric procedures were used to develop and test the scale, including a qualitative framework concept and item-pool development, item reduction, and scale development. We analyzed the psychometric properties of ABCR-14 according to entropy, polyserial correlation coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, average variance extracted, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and multidimensional item response theory (MIRT).The results of the analysis supported a three-factor model consisting of 14 items. The validity and reliability of ABCR-14 was suggested by evidence from high construct validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. The result of the MIRT offered strong support for good item response of item slope parameters and difficulty parameters. However, the ABCR-14 Likert scale might need to be explored from the MIRT point of view. Yet, as mentioned above, there is sufficient evidence to support that ABCR-14 has high validity and reliability.The ABCR-14 demonstrates good psychometric properties for nursing belief conflict. Further studies are recommended to confirm its application in clinical practice. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T18:17:59Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-09c54a9ba79641409658e60e9b06051f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T18:17:59Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-09c54a9ba79641409658e60e9b06051f2022-12-22T00:16:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01108e012934910.1371/journal.pone.0129349Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14).Makoto KyougokuMutsumi TeraokaNoriko MasudaMariko OouraYasushi AbeNurses and other healthcare workers frequently experience belief conflict, one of the most important, new stress-related problems in both academic and clinical fields.In this study, using a sample of 1,683 nursing practitioners, we developed The Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14), a new scale that assesses belief conflict in the healthcare field. Standard psychometric procedures were used to develop and test the scale, including a qualitative framework concept and item-pool development, item reduction, and scale development. We analyzed the psychometric properties of ABCR-14 according to entropy, polyserial correlation coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, average variance extracted, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and multidimensional item response theory (MIRT).The results of the analysis supported a three-factor model consisting of 14 items. The validity and reliability of ABCR-14 was suggested by evidence from high construct validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. The result of the MIRT offered strong support for good item response of item slope parameters and difficulty parameters. However, the ABCR-14 Likert scale might need to be explored from the MIRT point of view. Yet, as mentioned above, there is sufficient evidence to support that ABCR-14 has high validity and reliability.The ABCR-14 demonstrates good psychometric properties for nursing belief conflict. Further studies are recommended to confirm its application in clinical practice.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4527743?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Makoto Kyougoku Mutsumi Teraoka Noriko Masuda Mariko Ooura Yasushi Abe Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14). PLoS ONE |
title | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14). |
title_full | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14). |
title_fullStr | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14). |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14). |
title_short | Development of the Assessment of Belief Conflict in Relationship-14 (ABCR-14). |
title_sort | development of the assessment of belief conflict in relationship 14 abcr 14 |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4527743?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makotokyougoku developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT mutsumiteraoka developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT norikomasuda developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT marikoooura developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 AT yasushiabe developmentoftheassessmentofbeliefconflictinrelationship14abcr14 |