Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the relationship between the amount of early bone remodeling, the marginal bone loss (MBL) progression, and the peri-implant sulcular fluid concentration of active metalloproteinase-8 (a-MMP-8) and the incidence of peri-implantitis (P) over 5 ye...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renzo Guarnieri, Rodolfo Reda, Alessio Zanza, Gabriele Miccoli, Dario Di Nardo, Luca Testarelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/11/2599
_version_ 1827646835896877056
author Renzo Guarnieri
Rodolfo Reda
Alessio Zanza
Gabriele Miccoli
Dario Di Nardo
Luca Testarelli
author_facet Renzo Guarnieri
Rodolfo Reda
Alessio Zanza
Gabriele Miccoli
Dario Di Nardo
Luca Testarelli
author_sort Renzo Guarnieri
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the relationship between the amount of early bone remodeling, the marginal bone loss (MBL) progression, and the peri-implant sulcular fluid concentration of active metalloproteinase-8 (a-MMP-8) and the incidence of peri-implantitis (P) over 5 years of implant function. It has been documented that dental implants with a high degree of early marginal bone loss (MBL) are likely to achieve additional increased MBL during function. Moreover, it has been speculated that early increased MBL might be a predictive factor for the subsequent onset of peri-implant inflammatory diseases. Clinical and radiographic data at implant placement (T0) and restoration delivery (TR) at 6 months (T1), 2 years (T2), and 5 years (T5) post-loading were retrospectively collected. MBL levels/rates (MBLr) and peri-implant sulcular fluid levels/rates of a-MMP-8 were assessed at TR, T1, T2, and T5. Implants were divided into two groups: group 1 with peri-implantitis (P+) and group 2 without peri-implantitis (P−). A multi-level simple binary logistic regression, using generalized estimation equations (GEEs), was implemented to assess the association between each independent variable and P+. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate an optimal cutoff point for T1 MBL degree and a-MMP-8 level to discriminate between P+ and P− implants. A total of 80 patients who had received 80 implants between them (39 implants with a laser-microtextured collar surface (LMS) and 41 implants with a machined collar surface (MS)) were included. Periapical radiographs and a software package were used to measure MBL rates. Peri-implant sulcular implant fluid samples were analyzed by a chairside mouth-rinse test (ImplantSafe<sup>®</sup>) in combination with a digital reader (ORALyzer<sup>®</sup>). Twenty-four implants (six with an LMS and eighteen with an MS) were classified as P+. No statistically significant association was found between the amount of early bone remodeling, MBL progression, and MBLr and the incidence of peri-implantitis. Implants with a-MMP-8 levels >15.3 ng/mL at T1 presented a significantly higher probability of P+. The amount of early marginal bone remodeling cannot be considered as an indicator of the subsequent onset of P, whereas high a-MMP-8 levels 6 months after loading could have a distinct ability to predict P.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:08:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-09cd5f2c967f4ed68c96513024241888
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:08:59Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-09cd5f2c967f4ed68c965130242418882023-11-24T04:17:51ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182022-10-011211259910.3390/diagnostics12112599Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year StudyRenzo Guarnieri0Rodolfo Reda1Alessio Zanza2Gabriele Miccoli3Dario Di Nardo4Luca Testarelli5Private Periodontal Implant Practice, 31100 Treviso, ItalyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, ItalyThe aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the relationship between the amount of early bone remodeling, the marginal bone loss (MBL) progression, and the peri-implant sulcular fluid concentration of active metalloproteinase-8 (a-MMP-8) and the incidence of peri-implantitis (P) over 5 years of implant function. It has been documented that dental implants with a high degree of early marginal bone loss (MBL) are likely to achieve additional increased MBL during function. Moreover, it has been speculated that early increased MBL might be a predictive factor for the subsequent onset of peri-implant inflammatory diseases. Clinical and radiographic data at implant placement (T0) and restoration delivery (TR) at 6 months (T1), 2 years (T2), and 5 years (T5) post-loading were retrospectively collected. MBL levels/rates (MBLr) and peri-implant sulcular fluid levels/rates of a-MMP-8 were assessed at TR, T1, T2, and T5. Implants were divided into two groups: group 1 with peri-implantitis (P+) and group 2 without peri-implantitis (P−). A multi-level simple binary logistic regression, using generalized estimation equations (GEEs), was implemented to assess the association between each independent variable and P+. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate an optimal cutoff point for T1 MBL degree and a-MMP-8 level to discriminate between P+ and P− implants. A total of 80 patients who had received 80 implants between them (39 implants with a laser-microtextured collar surface (LMS) and 41 implants with a machined collar surface (MS)) were included. Periapical radiographs and a software package were used to measure MBL rates. Peri-implant sulcular implant fluid samples were analyzed by a chairside mouth-rinse test (ImplantSafe<sup>®</sup>) in combination with a digital reader (ORALyzer<sup>®</sup>). Twenty-four implants (six with an LMS and eighteen with an MS) were classified as P+. No statistically significant association was found between the amount of early bone remodeling, MBL progression, and MBLr and the incidence of peri-implantitis. Implants with a-MMP-8 levels >15.3 ng/mL at T1 presented a significantly higher probability of P+. The amount of early marginal bone remodeling cannot be considered as an indicator of the subsequent onset of P, whereas high a-MMP-8 levels 6 months after loading could have a distinct ability to predict P.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/11/2599implantMMP-8marginal bone lossperi-implant sulcusinterleukins
spellingShingle Renzo Guarnieri
Rodolfo Reda
Alessio Zanza
Gabriele Miccoli
Dario Di Nardo
Luca Testarelli
Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study
Diagnostics
implant
MMP-8
marginal bone loss
peri-implant sulcus
interleukins
title Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study
title_full Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study
title_fullStr Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study
title_full_unstemmed Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study
title_short Can Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Progression and a-MMP-8 Be Considered Indicators of the Subsequent Onset of Peri-Implantitis? A 5-Year Study
title_sort can peri implant marginal bone loss progression and a mmp 8 be considered indicators of the subsequent onset of peri implantitis a 5 year study
topic implant
MMP-8
marginal bone loss
peri-implant sulcus
interleukins
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/11/2599
work_keys_str_mv AT renzoguarnieri canperiimplantmarginalbonelossprogressionandammp8beconsideredindicatorsofthesubsequentonsetofperiimplantitisa5yearstudy
AT rodolforeda canperiimplantmarginalbonelossprogressionandammp8beconsideredindicatorsofthesubsequentonsetofperiimplantitisa5yearstudy
AT alessiozanza canperiimplantmarginalbonelossprogressionandammp8beconsideredindicatorsofthesubsequentonsetofperiimplantitisa5yearstudy
AT gabrielemiccoli canperiimplantmarginalbonelossprogressionandammp8beconsideredindicatorsofthesubsequentonsetofperiimplantitisa5yearstudy
AT dariodinardo canperiimplantmarginalbonelossprogressionandammp8beconsideredindicatorsofthesubsequentonsetofperiimplantitisa5yearstudy
AT lucatestarelli canperiimplantmarginalbonelossprogressionandammp8beconsideredindicatorsofthesubsequentonsetofperiimplantitisa5yearstudy