Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla
Objectives: the aim of this clinical study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of short dental implants inserted in pristine bone to standard length implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Materials and methods: For this clinical study, the clinical and radiologica...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Acta Stomatologica Croatica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/404029 |
| _version_ | 1797206697093103616 |
|---|---|
| author | Elk Schiegnitz Nina Hill Keyvan Sagheb Jochem König Kawe Sagheb Bilal Al-Nawas |
| author_facet | Elk Schiegnitz Nina Hill Keyvan Sagheb Jochem König Kawe Sagheb Bilal Al-Nawas |
| author_sort | Elk Schiegnitz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives: the aim of this clinical study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of short dental implants inserted in pristine bone to standard length implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Materials and methods: For this clinical study, the clinical and radiological outcome of 126 short dental implants (84 patients), inserted in pristine bone were compared with 312 standard length implants (156 patients), placed in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. Results: The short implant group (test group [TG]; mean follow-up (± standard deviation (SD) 56.6 ± 42.9 months) and the augmented group (control group [CG]; mean follow-up 41.6 ± 37.6 months) showed cumulative survival rates of 91.8% and 92.4%. Cumulative 5-year implant survival rates were 91.8% for the TG and 90.7% for the CG (p=0.421). Mean marginal bone loss was significantly higher in the CG than in the TG, with a mean MBL of 0.70 ± 0.72 mm in the TG and 0.96 ± 0.91 mm in the CG (p<0.001). A comparable and promising oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was observed in the control and test groups. Conclusions: After over 3 years, short implants placed in the resorbed posterior maxilla obtained similar results to standard implants combined with maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:11:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-09d17215c4754bf6ac39c78bfd565708 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0001-7019 1846-0410 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:11:08Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Stomatologica Croatica |
| spelling | doaj.art-09d17215c4754bf6ac39c78bfd5657082024-04-15T17:44:39ZengUniversity of Zagreb. School of Dental MedicineActa Stomatologica Croatica0001-70191846-04102022-01-0156214315310.15644/asc56/2/5Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior MaxillaElk Schiegnitz0Nina Hill1Keyvan Sagheb2Jochem König3Kawe Sagheb4Bilal Al-Nawas5Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, GermanyInstitute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, GermanyObjectives: the aim of this clinical study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of short dental implants inserted in pristine bone to standard length implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Materials and methods: For this clinical study, the clinical and radiological outcome of 126 short dental implants (84 patients), inserted in pristine bone were compared with 312 standard length implants (156 patients), placed in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. Results: The short implant group (test group [TG]; mean follow-up (± standard deviation (SD) 56.6 ± 42.9 months) and the augmented group (control group [CG]; mean follow-up 41.6 ± 37.6 months) showed cumulative survival rates of 91.8% and 92.4%. Cumulative 5-year implant survival rates were 91.8% for the TG and 90.7% for the CG (p=0.421). Mean marginal bone loss was significantly higher in the CG than in the TG, with a mean MBL of 0.70 ± 0.72 mm in the TG and 0.96 ± 0.91 mm in the CG (p<0.001). A comparable and promising oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was observed in the control and test groups. Conclusions: After over 3 years, short implants placed in the resorbed posterior maxilla obtained similar results to standard implants combined with maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/404029Dental ImplantsSinus Floor AugmentationMaxillaDental ImplantationMaxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation |
| spellingShingle | Elk Schiegnitz Nina Hill Keyvan Sagheb Jochem König Kawe Sagheb Bilal Al-Nawas Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Acta Stomatologica Croatica Dental Implants Sinus Floor Augmentation Maxilla Dental Implantation Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation |
| title | Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla |
| title_full | Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla |
| title_fullStr | Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla |
| title_full_unstemmed | Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla |
| title_short | Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla |
| title_sort | short versus standard length implants with sinus floor elevation for the atrophic posterior maxilla |
| topic | Dental Implants Sinus Floor Augmentation Maxilla Dental Implantation Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation |
| url | https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/404029 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elkschiegnitz shortversusstandardlengthimplantswithsinusfloorelevationfortheatrophicposteriormaxilla AT ninahill shortversusstandardlengthimplantswithsinusfloorelevationfortheatrophicposteriormaxilla AT keyvansagheb shortversusstandardlengthimplantswithsinusfloorelevationfortheatrophicposteriormaxilla AT jochemkonig shortversusstandardlengthimplantswithsinusfloorelevationfortheatrophicposteriormaxilla AT kawesagheb shortversusstandardlengthimplantswithsinusfloorelevationfortheatrophicposteriormaxilla AT bilalalnawas shortversusstandardlengthimplantswithsinusfloorelevationfortheatrophicposteriormaxilla |