Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results
Aim To compare the correlation of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and tono-pen (TP) in glaucomatous and healthy eyes, and to investigate the effect of central corneal thickness (...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton
2018-08-01
|
| Series: | Medicinski Glasnik |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ljkzedo.ba/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/13-Yildiz-960-A.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818931544314609664 |
|---|---|
| author | Aydın Yildiz Tekin Yasar |
| author_facet | Aydın Yildiz Tekin Yasar |
| author_sort | Aydın Yildiz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim To compare the correlation of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and tono-pen (TP) in glaucomatous and healthy eyes, and to investigate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the measurements.
Methods One hundred eyes of 100 glaucoma patients and 50 eyes of 50 healthy individuals were compared. In all of the eyes, CCT was evaluated using ultrasonic pachymeter. IOP was measured using NCT, TP, DCT and GAT, respectively. IOP measurements and correlation of these measurements with CCT were calculated using Pearson and intra-group correlation analysis.
Results In the glaucoma group, the mean IOP was 16.42 ± 2.80 mmHg with NCT, 17.12 ± 2.49 mmHg with TP, 18.27 ± 2.62 mmHg with DCT and 16.08 ± 3.00 mmHg with GAT. The mean CCT was 532.15 ± 39.08 μm. In normal individuals, mean IOP was 14.64 ± 2.20 mmHg with NCT, 15.32 ± 1.85 mmHg with TP, 16.72 ± 2.31 mmHg with DCT and 14.16 ± 2.80 mmHg with GAT. The mean CCT was 538.40 ± 31.64 μm.
Conclusion A strong compliance between NCT and GAT has been observed. NCT can be used instead of GAT. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-20T04:18:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-09d3070e12ad4052994bb1c0a655dd02 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1840-0132 1840-2445 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-20T04:18:17Z |
| publishDate | 2018-08-01 |
| publisher | Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Medicinski Glasnik |
| spelling | doaj.art-09d3070e12ad4052994bb1c0a655dd022022-12-21T19:53:42ZengMedical Association of Zenica-Doboj CantonMedicinski Glasnik1840-01321840-24452018-08-0115215215710.17392/960-18Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement resultsAydın Yildiz0Tekin Yasar1Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, 18 Mart University CanakkaleDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beyoglu Eye Hospital, Istanbul; TurkeyAim To compare the correlation of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and tono-pen (TP) in glaucomatous and healthy eyes, and to investigate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the measurements. Methods One hundred eyes of 100 glaucoma patients and 50 eyes of 50 healthy individuals were compared. In all of the eyes, CCT was evaluated using ultrasonic pachymeter. IOP was measured using NCT, TP, DCT and GAT, respectively. IOP measurements and correlation of these measurements with CCT were calculated using Pearson and intra-group correlation analysis. Results In the glaucoma group, the mean IOP was 16.42 ± 2.80 mmHg with NCT, 17.12 ± 2.49 mmHg with TP, 18.27 ± 2.62 mmHg with DCT and 16.08 ± 3.00 mmHg with GAT. The mean CCT was 532.15 ± 39.08 μm. In normal individuals, mean IOP was 14.64 ± 2.20 mmHg with NCT, 15.32 ± 1.85 mmHg with TP, 16.72 ± 2.31 mmHg with DCT and 14.16 ± 2.80 mmHg with GAT. The mean CCT was 538.40 ± 31.64 μm. Conclusion A strong compliance between NCT and GAT has been observed. NCT can be used instead of GAT.http://ljkzedo.ba/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/13-Yildiz-960-A.pdfintraocular pressureglaucomacorneatonometerpachymeter |
| spellingShingle | Aydın Yildiz Tekin Yasar Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results Medicinski Glasnik intraocular pressure glaucoma cornea tonometer pachymeter |
| title | Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results |
| title_full | Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results |
| title_short | Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results |
| title_sort | comparison of goldmann applanation non contact dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results |
| topic | intraocular pressure glaucoma cornea tonometer pachymeter |
| url | http://ljkzedo.ba/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/13-Yildiz-960-A.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aydınyildiz comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactdynamiccontourandtonopentonometrymeasurementsinhealthyandglaucomatouseyesandeffectofcentralcornealthicknessonthemeasurementresults AT tekinyasar comparisonofgoldmannapplanationnoncontactdynamiccontourandtonopentonometrymeasurementsinhealthyandglaucomatouseyesandeffectofcentralcornealthicknessonthemeasurementresults |