Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

<p class="p p-first-last" id="__p2">Current diagnostic modalities are based almost exclusively on laboratory findings and the role of clinical presentation remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic value of clinical presentation in detecting p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Shohat, K. Goswami, T. L. Tan, B. Henstenburg, G. Makar, A. J. Rondon, J. Parvizi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Online Access:https://jbji.copernicus.org/articles/4/92/2019/jbji-4-92-2019.pdf
_version_ 1818736292085628928
author N. Shohat
N. Shohat
K. Goswami
T. L. Tan
B. Henstenburg
G. Makar
A. J. Rondon
J. Parvizi
author_facet N. Shohat
N. Shohat
K. Goswami
T. L. Tan
B. Henstenburg
G. Makar
A. J. Rondon
J. Parvizi
author_sort N. Shohat
collection DOAJ
description <p class="p p-first-last" id="__p2">Current diagnostic modalities are based almost exclusively on laboratory findings and the role of clinical presentation remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic value of clinical presentation in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study evaluated 279 patients undergoing revision surgery for failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2001-2016. Patients were classified as undergoing septic revisions based on major MSIS criteria. Aseptic revisions were defined as cases of single stage revision that did not have suspected PJI, fulfill MSIS criteria, or subsequently fail within one year of follow-up. Clinical presentation included pain, fever, presence of joint effusion or erythema, and reduced range of motion. Serum and synovial laboratory markers were also evaluated. The diagnostic value of each test was assessed and a Fagan's nomogram was constructed. A subset of MSIS-negative patients was used to demonstrate the value of various clinical presentations in detecting PJI. Post-test probability for infection was calculated taking into account clinical presentation together with serum and synovial markers. Our results show that fever and erythema are the most important signs for diagnosing PJI with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 10.78 and 8.08, respectively. Effusion had a LR of 2.42. Pain and reduced ROM were not as strongly correlated with PJI diagnosis; LR was 1.02 and 1.51. Of the 35 MSIS-negative patients treated for PJI, 33 had a post-test probability of infection greater than 90% when taking clinical presentation into account. Clinical presentation should be used to guide which future diagnostic tests should be ordered and in the interpretation of their results. Our results indicate that pain, fever, presence of joint effusion or erythema, and reduced range of motion should prompt further workup for infection. We propose a nomogram that may be used in interoperating their individual weight together with laboratory findings. Fever and erythema are highly specific findings in patients with PJI and future studies should assess whether they may be added as minor criteria to current definitions for infection.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T00:34:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-09e0d5977e5946e1940e26e9ebc443f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2206-3552
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T00:34:50Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
spelling doaj.art-09e0d5977e5946e1940e26e9ebc443f62022-12-21T21:27:03ZengCopernicus PublicationsJournal of Bone and Joint Infection2206-35522019-03-014929810.7150/jbji.30088Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee ArthroplastyN. Shohat0N. Shohat1K. Goswami2T. L. Tan3B. Henstenburg4G. Makar5A. J. Rondon6J. Parvizi7The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, IsraelThe Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107<p class="p p-first-last" id="__p2">Current diagnostic modalities are based almost exclusively on laboratory findings and the role of clinical presentation remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic value of clinical presentation in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study evaluated 279 patients undergoing revision surgery for failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2001-2016. Patients were classified as undergoing septic revisions based on major MSIS criteria. Aseptic revisions were defined as cases of single stage revision that did not have suspected PJI, fulfill MSIS criteria, or subsequently fail within one year of follow-up. Clinical presentation included pain, fever, presence of joint effusion or erythema, and reduced range of motion. Serum and synovial laboratory markers were also evaluated. The diagnostic value of each test was assessed and a Fagan's nomogram was constructed. A subset of MSIS-negative patients was used to demonstrate the value of various clinical presentations in detecting PJI. Post-test probability for infection was calculated taking into account clinical presentation together with serum and synovial markers. Our results show that fever and erythema are the most important signs for diagnosing PJI with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 10.78 and 8.08, respectively. Effusion had a LR of 2.42. Pain and reduced ROM were not as strongly correlated with PJI diagnosis; LR was 1.02 and 1.51. Of the 35 MSIS-negative patients treated for PJI, 33 had a post-test probability of infection greater than 90% when taking clinical presentation into account. Clinical presentation should be used to guide which future diagnostic tests should be ordered and in the interpretation of their results. Our results indicate that pain, fever, presence of joint effusion or erythema, and reduced range of motion should prompt further workup for infection. We propose a nomogram that may be used in interoperating their individual weight together with laboratory findings. Fever and erythema are highly specific findings in patients with PJI and future studies should assess whether they may be added as minor criteria to current definitions for infection.</p>https://jbji.copernicus.org/articles/4/92/2019/jbji-4-92-2019.pdf
spellingShingle N. Shohat
N. Shohat
K. Goswami
T. L. Tan
B. Henstenburg
G. Makar
A. J. Rondon
J. Parvizi
Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
title Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Fever and Erythema are Specific Findings in Detecting Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort fever and erythema are specific findings in detecting infection following total knee arthroplasty
url https://jbji.copernicus.org/articles/4/92/2019/jbji-4-92-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nshohat feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT nshohat feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT kgoswami feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT tltan feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT bhenstenburg feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT gmakar feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT ajrondon feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty
AT jparvizi feveranderythemaarespecificfindingsindetectinginfectionfollowingtotalkneearthroplasty