The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts

Objective: To assess the impact of a novel touch-cure polymerization of dual-curing resin cement on the push-out bonding strength (PBS) of the conventional prefabricated glass fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC) and custom-made glass fiber (GF) posts at different root sections. Methods: Forty single-r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raghad S. Jamel, Emad Farhan Alkhalidi, Alaa Edrees Dawood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-04-01
Series:Saudi Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223002791
_version_ 1797203072905117696
author Raghad S. Jamel
Emad Farhan Alkhalidi
Alaa Edrees Dawood
author_facet Raghad S. Jamel
Emad Farhan Alkhalidi
Alaa Edrees Dawood
author_sort Raghad S. Jamel
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To assess the impact of a novel touch-cure polymerization of dual-curing resin cement on the push-out bonding strength (PBS) of the conventional prefabricated glass fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC) and custom-made glass fiber (GF) posts at different root sections. Methods: Forty single-root mandibular first premolars were treated endodontically and prepared for receiving the posts, the prepared roots were randomly divided into 4 groups. Group I: A prefabricated (GFRC) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE resin cement with adhesive-enhancing primer (AEP). Group II: A prefabricated (GFRC) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE without AEP. Group III: A customized (GF) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE with AEP. Group IV: A customized (GF) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE without AEP. (n = 10 for each group). The PBS was tested with a universal testing machine, and the values were analyzed with (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test at a P ≤ 0.05 significance level. Results: Group III revealed the greatest PBS values, followed by Group IV, Group I, and finally, Group II showed the lowest PBS values. The coronal root slices showed the highest PBS in comparison with the middle and apical third. Conclusion: The touch-cure polymerization improved the PBS of the prefabricated and customized fiber posts. Therefore, ‟touch and cure” cement may be considered a clinical alternative to conventional types of resin cement. The customized (GF) posts exhibited a higher PBS than the prefabricated (GFRC). The combination of customized posts and G-CEM ONE with AEP is recommended as a new strategic approach to improve interfacial adhesion.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:13:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a019331c82c49f0937ca52e62b05cba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1013-9052
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:13:31Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Saudi Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-0a019331c82c49f0937ca52e62b05cba2024-04-17T04:48:32ZengElsevierSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522024-04-01364627632The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber postsRaghad S. Jamel0Emad Farhan Alkhalidi1Alaa Edrees Dawood2Corresponding author.; Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, IraqDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, IraqDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, IraqObjective: To assess the impact of a novel touch-cure polymerization of dual-curing resin cement on the push-out bonding strength (PBS) of the conventional prefabricated glass fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC) and custom-made glass fiber (GF) posts at different root sections. Methods: Forty single-root mandibular first premolars were treated endodontically and prepared for receiving the posts, the prepared roots were randomly divided into 4 groups. Group I: A prefabricated (GFRC) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE resin cement with adhesive-enhancing primer (AEP). Group II: A prefabricated (GFRC) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE without AEP. Group III: A customized (GF) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE with AEP. Group IV: A customized (GF) post was cemented by G-CEM ONE without AEP. (n = 10 for each group). The PBS was tested with a universal testing machine, and the values were analyzed with (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test at a P ≤ 0.05 significance level. Results: Group III revealed the greatest PBS values, followed by Group IV, Group I, and finally, Group II showed the lowest PBS values. The coronal root slices showed the highest PBS in comparison with the middle and apical third. Conclusion: The touch-cure polymerization improved the PBS of the prefabricated and customized fiber posts. Therefore, ‟touch and cure” cement may be considered a clinical alternative to conventional types of resin cement. The customized (GF) posts exhibited a higher PBS than the prefabricated (GFRC). The combination of customized posts and G-CEM ONE with AEP is recommended as a new strategic approach to improve interfacial adhesion.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223002791Bond strengthFiber postsG-CEM ONETouch-cure polymerization
spellingShingle Raghad S. Jamel
Emad Farhan Alkhalidi
Alaa Edrees Dawood
The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts
Saudi Dental Journal
Bond strength
Fiber posts
G-CEM ONE
Touch-cure polymerization
title The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts
title_full The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts
title_fullStr The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts
title_full_unstemmed The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts
title_short The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts
title_sort effect of touch cure polymerization on the push out bond strength of fiber posts
topic Bond strength
Fiber posts
G-CEM ONE
Touch-cure polymerization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905223002791
work_keys_str_mv AT raghadsjamel theeffectoftouchcurepolymerizationonthepushoutbondstrengthoffiberposts
AT emadfarhanalkhalidi theeffectoftouchcurepolymerizationonthepushoutbondstrengthoffiberposts
AT alaaedreesdawood theeffectoftouchcurepolymerizationonthepushoutbondstrengthoffiberposts
AT raghadsjamel effectoftouchcurepolymerizationonthepushoutbondstrengthoffiberposts
AT emadfarhanalkhalidi effectoftouchcurepolymerizationonthepushoutbondstrengthoffiberposts
AT alaaedreesdawood effectoftouchcurepolymerizationonthepushoutbondstrengthoffiberposts