Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining

Commercial gestation housing systems for sows generally fail to cater fully for their needs in terms of comfort or the ability to perform highly motivated behaviours, which can lead to chronic stress and an impairment to welfare. We compared a typical gestation system (CONTROL) with an IMPROVED one...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martyna E Lagoda, Keelin O’Driscoll, Maria C Galli, Joanna Marchewka, Laura A Boyle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-01-01
Series:Animal Welfare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0962728623000477/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797772079583461376
author Martyna E Lagoda
Keelin O’Driscoll
Maria C Galli
Joanna Marchewka
Laura A Boyle
author_facet Martyna E Lagoda
Keelin O’Driscoll
Maria C Galli
Joanna Marchewka
Laura A Boyle
author_sort Martyna E Lagoda
collection DOAJ
description Commercial gestation housing systems for sows generally fail to cater fully for their needs in terms of comfort or the ability to perform highly motivated behaviours, which can lead to chronic stress and an impairment to welfare. We compared a typical gestation system (CONTROL) with an IMPROVED one as regards oral stereotypies, aggressive behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining. Sows were mixed into 12 stable groups (six groups per treatment, 20 sows per group), 29 days post-service in pens with free-access, full-length individual feeding/lying stalls. CONTROL pens had fully slatted concrete floors, with two blocks of wood and two chains suspended in the group area. IMPROVED pens were the same but with rubber mats and a length of manila rope in each feeding stall, and straw provided in three racks in the group area. Direct observations of oral stereotypical (30 instantaneous scans per sow per day) and aggressive (all-occurrence sampling, 3 h per sow per day) behaviours were conducted 72 h post-mixing, in mid and late gestation. Skin lesions were counted 24 h and three weeks post-mixing, and in late gestation. Sows’ locomotion (locomotory ability) was scored using a visual analogue scale in mid and late gestation. Right and left eye tear staining was scored in late gestation. Indications of better welfare in IMPROVED sows included performance of fewer oral stereotypies in mid and late gestation, and lower tear stain scores. These sows performed more aggression in late gestation, which was associated with access to enrichment, but skin lesion counts were not affected. Thus, the changes made in the IMPROVED treatment benefitted aspects of sow welfare.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:46:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a03e0164e964bd3aa17dd0e0db26ab7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0962-7286
2054-1538
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:46:53Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Animal Welfare
spelling doaj.art-0a03e0164e964bd3aa17dd0e0db26ab72023-07-26T09:06:11ZengCambridge University PressAnimal Welfare0962-72862054-15382023-01-013210.1017/awf.2023.47Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear stainingMartyna E Lagoda0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4719-3244Keelin O’Driscoll1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0944-3732Maria C Galli2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7466-2670Joanna Marchewka3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-8677Laura A Boyle4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-1776Pig Development Department, Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Teagasc Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, Ireland Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Animal Behaviour, ul. Postępu 36A, Jastrzębiec 05-552Pig Development Department, Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Teagasc Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, IrelandDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020, Legnaro (PD), ItalyInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Animal Behaviour, ul. Postępu 36A, Jastrzębiec 05-552Pig Development Department, Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Teagasc Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, IrelandCommercial gestation housing systems for sows generally fail to cater fully for their needs in terms of comfort or the ability to perform highly motivated behaviours, which can lead to chronic stress and an impairment to welfare. We compared a typical gestation system (CONTROL) with an IMPROVED one as regards oral stereotypies, aggressive behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining. Sows were mixed into 12 stable groups (six groups per treatment, 20 sows per group), 29 days post-service in pens with free-access, full-length individual feeding/lying stalls. CONTROL pens had fully slatted concrete floors, with two blocks of wood and two chains suspended in the group area. IMPROVED pens were the same but with rubber mats and a length of manila rope in each feeding stall, and straw provided in three racks in the group area. Direct observations of oral stereotypical (30 instantaneous scans per sow per day) and aggressive (all-occurrence sampling, 3 h per sow per day) behaviours were conducted 72 h post-mixing, in mid and late gestation. Skin lesions were counted 24 h and three weeks post-mixing, and in late gestation. Sows’ locomotion (locomotory ability) was scored using a visual analogue scale in mid and late gestation. Right and left eye tear staining was scored in late gestation. Indications of better welfare in IMPROVED sows included performance of fewer oral stereotypies in mid and late gestation, and lower tear stain scores. These sows performed more aggression in late gestation, which was associated with access to enrichment, but skin lesion counts were not affected. Thus, the changes made in the IMPROVED treatment benefitted aspects of sow welfare.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0962728623000477/type/journal_articleanimal welfarepigroperubberstrawchronic stress
spellingShingle Martyna E Lagoda
Keelin O’Driscoll
Maria C Galli
Joanna Marchewka
Laura A Boyle
Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining
Animal Welfare
animal welfare
pig
rope
rubber
straw
chronic stress
title Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining
title_full Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining
title_fullStr Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining
title_full_unstemmed Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining
title_short Indicators of improved gestation housing of sows. Part I: Effects on behaviour, skin lesions, locomotion, and tear staining
title_sort indicators of improved gestation housing of sows part i effects on behaviour skin lesions locomotion and tear staining
topic animal welfare
pig
rope
rubber
straw
chronic stress
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0962728623000477/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT martynaelagoda indicatorsofimprovedgestationhousingofsowspartieffectsonbehaviourskinlesionslocomotionandtearstaining
AT keelinodriscoll indicatorsofimprovedgestationhousingofsowspartieffectsonbehaviourskinlesionslocomotionandtearstaining
AT mariacgalli indicatorsofimprovedgestationhousingofsowspartieffectsonbehaviourskinlesionslocomotionandtearstaining
AT joannamarchewka indicatorsofimprovedgestationhousingofsowspartieffectsonbehaviourskinlesionslocomotionandtearstaining
AT lauraaboyle indicatorsofimprovedgestationhousingofsowspartieffectsonbehaviourskinlesionslocomotionandtearstaining