Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur
To survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this arti...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Nordicom Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0014 |
_version_ | 1797759704238129152 |
---|---|
author | Lillegraven Tor-Bøe Wilberg Erik |
author_facet | Lillegraven Tor-Bøe Wilberg Erik |
author_sort | Lillegraven Tor-Bøe |
collection | DOAJ |
description | To survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this article, we develop and empirically test a set of hypotheses related to ambidexterity, a key example of a paradoxical strategy. Through our analysis of data from a survey of executive leaders, we find a link between organizational ambidexterity and strategic planning, suggesting that the complexities of navigating in explorative ventures require more explicit strategy work than the old certainties of a legacy business. We identify and discuss inherent paradoxes and their implications for firm performance in 22 industry-specific strategies, where empirical industry data shows a pattern of conflict between explorative growth strategies and exploitative profit strategies. We argue that this is just one of the inherent paradoxes in the ambidexterity construct. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T18:48:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0a0a0a4c23114eb7904326b3ff79709f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2001-5119 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T18:48:15Z |
publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | Article |
series | Nordicom Review |
spelling | doaj.art-0a0a0a4c23114eb7904326b3ff79709f2023-08-02T07:24:06ZengSciendoNordicom Review2001-51192016-11-0137211513010.1515/nor-2016-0014Editor, Executive and EntrepreneurLillegraven Tor-Bøe0Wilberg Erik1Ph.D., Department of Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business SchoolDr., Associate Professor, Department of Strategy and Logistics, BI Norwegian Business SchoolTo survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this article, we develop and empirically test a set of hypotheses related to ambidexterity, a key example of a paradoxical strategy. Through our analysis of data from a survey of executive leaders, we find a link between organizational ambidexterity and strategic planning, suggesting that the complexities of navigating in explorative ventures require more explicit strategy work than the old certainties of a legacy business. We identify and discuss inherent paradoxes and their implications for firm performance in 22 industry-specific strategies, where empirical industry data shows a pattern of conflict between explorative growth strategies and exploitative profit strategies. We argue that this is just one of the inherent paradoxes in the ambidexterity construct.https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0014ambidexterityleadershipstrategyparadoxesorganizational change |
spellingShingle | Lillegraven Tor-Bøe Wilberg Erik Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur Nordicom Review ambidexterity leadership strategy paradoxes organizational change |
title | Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur |
title_full | Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur |
title_fullStr | Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur |
title_full_unstemmed | Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur |
title_short | Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur |
title_sort | editor executive and entrepreneur |
topic | ambidexterity leadership strategy paradoxes organizational change |
url | https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lillegraventorbøe editorexecutiveandentrepreneur AT wilbergerik editorexecutiveandentrepreneur |