Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal Joint

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to compare the ultrasound guided injection and injection with palpation using MR arthrography regarding the differences in success rate and the extravasation rate of the two techniques. METHODS: In this prospective study, we planned to include patients to whom a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gökhan Polat, Ahmet Yalçın
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Van Yuzuncu Yil University, School of Medicine 2018-10-01
Series:Van Tıp Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=vtd&un=VTD-09825
_version_ 1797430304940490752
author Gökhan Polat
Ahmet Yalçın
author_facet Gökhan Polat
Ahmet Yalçın
author_sort Gökhan Polat
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to compare the ultrasound guided injection and injection with palpation using MR arthrography regarding the differences in success rate and the extravasation rate of the two techniques. METHODS: In this prospective study, we planned to include patients to whom an injection to the wrist was performed due to an indication. First, forty patients were divided into two groups and, ultrasound guided injection was performed to one group whereas injection was performed with palpation to the other. After the procedures, MR arthrography was performed to assess the reach of the contrast in to the joint space as well as extravasation into the adjacent soft tissues. RESULTS: There was contrast in the joint space in all injections guided by ultrasound (100%). Seventeen out of 20 injections which performed with palpation, there was contrast within the joint space (85%). Extravasations were seen in 3 patients (15%) with ultrasound guided injections group and 5 patients (25%) with palpation group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Injection to the wrist either under ultrasound guidance or with palpation, there was no significant difference by means of success and extravasation rate. Injection with palpation is a rapid and cost-effective technique however its success rate is hindered by pathologies that affect the palpation of the joint structure. In such circumstances, ultrasound guidance increase the success rate of the procedure.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:25:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a0cfd0a6edf4c56a85f06d7466d6ec4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2587-0351
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:25:41Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Van Yuzuncu Yil University, School of Medicine
record_format Article
series Van Tıp Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-0a0cfd0a6edf4c56a85f06d7466d6ec42023-12-02T05:56:00ZengVan Yuzuncu Yil University, School of MedicineVan Tıp Dergisi2587-03512018-10-0125448749110.5505/vtd.2018.09825VTD-09825Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal JointGökhan Polat0Ahmet Yalçın1Ataturk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of RadiologyErzincan University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of RadiologyINTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to compare the ultrasound guided injection and injection with palpation using MR arthrography regarding the differences in success rate and the extravasation rate of the two techniques. METHODS: In this prospective study, we planned to include patients to whom an injection to the wrist was performed due to an indication. First, forty patients were divided into two groups and, ultrasound guided injection was performed to one group whereas injection was performed with palpation to the other. After the procedures, MR arthrography was performed to assess the reach of the contrast in to the joint space as well as extravasation into the adjacent soft tissues. RESULTS: There was contrast in the joint space in all injections guided by ultrasound (100%). Seventeen out of 20 injections which performed with palpation, there was contrast within the joint space (85%). Extravasations were seen in 3 patients (15%) with ultrasound guided injections group and 5 patients (25%) with palpation group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Injection to the wrist either under ultrasound guidance or with palpation, there was no significant difference by means of success and extravasation rate. Injection with palpation is a rapid and cost-effective technique however its success rate is hindered by pathologies that affect the palpation of the joint structure. In such circumstances, ultrasound guidance increase the success rate of the procedure.https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=vtd&un=VTD-09825wristpalpationultrasonographyarthrography
spellingShingle Gökhan Polat
Ahmet Yalçın
Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal Joint
Van Tıp Dergisi
wrist
palpation
ultrasonography
arthrography
title Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal Joint
title_full Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal Joint
title_fullStr Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal Joint
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal Joint
title_short Comparison of Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Injection and Injection with Palpation to the Radiocarpal Joint
title_sort comparison of effectiveness of ultrasound guided injection and injection with palpation to the radiocarpal joint
topic wrist
palpation
ultrasonography
arthrography
url https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=vtd&un=VTD-09825
work_keys_str_mv AT gokhanpolat comparisonofeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedinjectionandinjectionwithpalpationtotheradiocarpaljoint
AT ahmetyalcın comparisonofeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedinjectionandinjectionwithpalpationtotheradiocarpaljoint