Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.

AIMS:To investigate predictors of long-term outcomes after catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and the impact of electrical storm (ES) prior to index ablation procedures. METHODS:We studied consecutive patients with structural heart disease and VT (n = 328; age: 63±12 years; 88%...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bashar Aldhoon, Dan Wichterle, Petr Peichl, Robert Čihák, Josef Kautzner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5302378?pdf=render
_version_ 1819076458128080896
author Bashar Aldhoon
Dan Wichterle
Petr Peichl
Robert Čihák
Josef Kautzner
author_facet Bashar Aldhoon
Dan Wichterle
Petr Peichl
Robert Čihák
Josef Kautzner
author_sort Bashar Aldhoon
collection DOAJ
description AIMS:To investigate predictors of long-term outcomes after catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and the impact of electrical storm (ES) prior to index ablation procedures. METHODS:We studied consecutive patients with structural heart disease and VT (n = 328; age: 63±12 years; 88% males; 72% ischaemic cardiomyopathy; LVEF: 32±12%) who had undergone CA. According to presenting arrhythmia at baseline, they were divided into ES (n = 93, 28%) and non-ES groups. Clinical predictors of all-cause mortality were investigated and a clinically useful risk score (SCORE) was constructed. RESULTS:During a median follow-up of 927 days (IQR: 564-1626), 67% vs. 60% of patients (p = 0.05) experienced VT recurrence in the ES vs. the non-ES group, respectively; and 41% vs. 32% patients died (p = 0.02), respectively. Five factors were independently associated with mortality: age >70 years (hazard ratio (HR): 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-2.4, p = 0.01), NYHA class ≥3 (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-2.9, p = 0.005), a serum creatinine level >1.3 mg/dL (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3, p = 0.02), LVEF ≤25% (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6-3.5, p = 0.00004), and amiodarone therapy (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.2, p = 0.03). A risk SCORE ranging from 0-4 (1 point for either high-risk age, NYHA, creatinine, or LVEF) correlated with mortality. ES during index ablation independently predicted mortality only in patients with a SCORE ≤1. CONCLUSIONS:Advanced LV dysfunction, older age, higher NYHA class, renal dysfunction, and amiodarone therapy, but not ES, were predictors of poor outcomes after CA for VT in the total population. However, ES did predict mortality in a low-risk sub-group of patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T18:41:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a1293ccb3264a58972524184a9774a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T18:41:37Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-0a1293ccb3264a58972524184a9774a92022-12-21T18:53:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01122e017183010.1371/journal.pone.0171830Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.Bashar AldhoonDan WichterlePetr PeichlRobert ČihákJosef KautznerAIMS:To investigate predictors of long-term outcomes after catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and the impact of electrical storm (ES) prior to index ablation procedures. METHODS:We studied consecutive patients with structural heart disease and VT (n = 328; age: 63±12 years; 88% males; 72% ischaemic cardiomyopathy; LVEF: 32±12%) who had undergone CA. According to presenting arrhythmia at baseline, they were divided into ES (n = 93, 28%) and non-ES groups. Clinical predictors of all-cause mortality were investigated and a clinically useful risk score (SCORE) was constructed. RESULTS:During a median follow-up of 927 days (IQR: 564-1626), 67% vs. 60% of patients (p = 0.05) experienced VT recurrence in the ES vs. the non-ES group, respectively; and 41% vs. 32% patients died (p = 0.02), respectively. Five factors were independently associated with mortality: age >70 years (hazard ratio (HR): 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-2.4, p = 0.01), NYHA class ≥3 (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-2.9, p = 0.005), a serum creatinine level >1.3 mg/dL (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3, p = 0.02), LVEF ≤25% (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6-3.5, p = 0.00004), and amiodarone therapy (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.2, p = 0.03). A risk SCORE ranging from 0-4 (1 point for either high-risk age, NYHA, creatinine, or LVEF) correlated with mortality. ES during index ablation independently predicted mortality only in patients with a SCORE ≤1. CONCLUSIONS:Advanced LV dysfunction, older age, higher NYHA class, renal dysfunction, and amiodarone therapy, but not ES, were predictors of poor outcomes after CA for VT in the total population. However, ES did predict mortality in a low-risk sub-group of patients.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5302378?pdf=render
spellingShingle Bashar Aldhoon
Dan Wichterle
Petr Peichl
Robert Čihák
Josef Kautzner
Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.
PLoS ONE
title Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.
title_full Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.
title_fullStr Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.
title_short Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm.
title_sort outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease the impact of electrical storm
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5302378?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT basharaldhoon outcomesofventriculartachycardiaablationinpatientswithstructuralheartdiseasetheimpactofelectricalstorm
AT danwichterle outcomesofventriculartachycardiaablationinpatientswithstructuralheartdiseasetheimpactofelectricalstorm
AT petrpeichl outcomesofventriculartachycardiaablationinpatientswithstructuralheartdiseasetheimpactofelectricalstorm
AT robertcihak outcomesofventriculartachycardiaablationinpatientswithstructuralheartdiseasetheimpactofelectricalstorm
AT josefkautzner outcomesofventriculartachycardiaablationinpatientswithstructuralheartdiseasetheimpactofelectricalstorm