Confidence intervals permit, but don't guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing
A statistically significant result, and a non-significant result may differ little, although significance status may tempt an interpretation of difference. Two studies are reported that compared interpretation of such results presented using null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), or confidenc...
Main Authors: | Melissa Coulson, Michelle Healey, Fiona Fidler, Geoff Cumming |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2010-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00026/full |
Similar Items
-
Understanding the new statistics : effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis /
by: 281033 Cumming, Geoff
Published: (2012) -
Confidence with confidence intervals
by: Thomas Ravi, et al.
Published: (1997-01-01) -
Better understanding of ‘don’t confuse absence of evidence with evidence of absence’
by: Rafael Leite Pacheco, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
P-Value, Confidence Intervals, and Statistical Inference: A New Dataset of Misinterpretation
by: Ziyang Lyu, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
The Shortest Clopper–Pearson Randomized Confidence Interval for Binomial Probability
by: Wojciech Zieliński
Published: (2017-01-01)