Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France

This paper reconstitutes and addresses critically the deontological and consequentialist arguments given by the French government to justify the denial of the national guaranteed minimum income support (RSA) to young people under 25 years old. The deontological arguments express a concern for distri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juliana Bidadanure
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tübingen University 2012-05-01
Series:Intergenerational Justice Review
Online Access:https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/462
_version_ 1797194092620283904
author Juliana Bidadanure
author_facet Juliana Bidadanure
author_sort Juliana Bidadanure
collection DOAJ
description This paper reconstitutes and addresses critically the deontological and consequentialist arguments given by the French government to justify the denial of the national guaranteed minimum income support (RSA) to young people under 25 years old. The deontological arguments express a concern for distributive justice and suggest that young people do not deserve income support. The consequentialist arguments, on the other hand, emphasise social efficiency: they draw on the alleged negative outcomes that the extension of income support to young people would bring about. After analysing each argument, this paper concludes that the denial of RSA to young people is an illegitimate discrimination. It then proposes that we understand our duties towards young people through an account of prudence that reconciles both (1) concerns of distributive justice with concerns for social efficiency and (2) concerns for inter- and intragenerational justices.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T05:50:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a20e5d2af504026a630911cfc9dc9a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2190-6335
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T05:50:47Z
publishDate 2012-05-01
publisher Tübingen University
record_format Article
series Intergenerational Justice Review
spelling doaj.art-0a20e5d2af504026a630911cfc9dc9a42024-04-23T11:07:34ZengTübingen UniversityIntergenerational Justice Review2190-63352012-05-011Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in FranceJuliana Bidadanure0University of York, School of Politics, Economics and PhilosophyThis paper reconstitutes and addresses critically the deontological and consequentialist arguments given by the French government to justify the denial of the national guaranteed minimum income support (RSA) to young people under 25 years old. The deontological arguments express a concern for distributive justice and suggest that young people do not deserve income support. The consequentialist arguments, on the other hand, emphasise social efficiency: they draw on the alleged negative outcomes that the extension of income support to young people would bring about. After analysing each argument, this paper concludes that the denial of RSA to young people is an illegitimate discrimination. It then proposes that we understand our duties towards young people through an account of prudence that reconciles both (1) concerns of distributive justice with concerns for social efficiency and (2) concerns for inter- and intragenerational justices.https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/462
spellingShingle Juliana Bidadanure
Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France
Intergenerational Justice Review
title Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France
title_full Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France
title_fullStr Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France
title_full_unstemmed Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France
title_short Short-sightedness in Youth Welfare Provision: The Case of RSA in France
title_sort short sightedness in youth welfare provision the case of rsa in france
url https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/462
work_keys_str_mv AT julianabidadanure shortsightednessinyouthwelfareprovisionthecaseofrsainfrance