COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
Abstract I argue that Duffley’s sign-based semantics and embodied semantics may be mutually beneficial if we conceive them as a semantic theory and as a foundational theory, respectively. First, I describe embodied semantics as a research program that conceives the foundations of meaning in terms of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Manuscrito |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452022000100123&lng=en&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1818774771907690496 |
---|---|
author | CESAR FERNANDO MEURER |
author_facet | CESAR FERNANDO MEURER |
author_sort | CESAR FERNANDO MEURER |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract I argue that Duffley’s sign-based semantics and embodied semantics may be mutually beneficial if we conceive them as a semantic theory and as a foundational theory, respectively. First, I describe embodied semantics as a research program that conceives the foundations of meaning in terms of embodied simulation. Afterwards, I draw attention to three points (the analysis of FOR, verbs of positive and negative recall, and causative verbs) where Duffley’s semantics could find support in such a foundational theory. Finally, I suggest that two pressing challenges currently on the agenda of embodied semantics (abstract language and sentence-level simulations) could be met by Duffley’s theory. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-18T10:46:27Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0a42f268b7bc418fbd3f4d79401f2247 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2317-630X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-18T10:46:27Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
record_format | Article |
series | Manuscrito |
spelling | doaj.art-0a42f268b7bc418fbd3f4d79401f22472022-12-21T21:10:32ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X2022-03-0145112314410.1590/0100-6045.2022.v45n1.cmCOULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?CESAR FERNANDO MEURERhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9504-0325Abstract I argue that Duffley’s sign-based semantics and embodied semantics may be mutually beneficial if we conceive them as a semantic theory and as a foundational theory, respectively. First, I describe embodied semantics as a research program that conceives the foundations of meaning in terms of embodied simulation. Afterwards, I draw attention to three points (the analysis of FOR, verbs of positive and negative recall, and causative verbs) where Duffley’s semantics could find support in such a foundational theory. Finally, I suggest that two pressing challenges currently on the agenda of embodied semantics (abstract language and sentence-level simulations) could be met by Duffley’s theory.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452022000100123&lng=en&tlng=enLinguistic meaningFoundations of meaningEmbodied cognition |
spellingShingle | CESAR FERNANDO MEURER COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER? Manuscrito Linguistic meaning Foundations of meaning Embodied cognition |
title | COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER? |
title_full | COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER? |
title_fullStr | COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER? |
title_full_unstemmed | COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER? |
title_short | COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER? |
title_sort | could sign based semantics and embodied semantics benefit one another |
topic | Linguistic meaning Foundations of meaning Embodied cognition |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452022000100123&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cesarfernandomeurer couldsignbasedsemanticsandembodiedsemanticsbenefitoneanother |