COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?

Abstract I argue that Duffley’s sign-based semantics and embodied semantics may be mutually beneficial if we conceive them as a semantic theory and as a foundational theory, respectively. First, I describe embodied semantics as a research program that conceives the foundations of meaning in terms of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CESAR FERNANDO MEURER
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2022-03-01
Series:Manuscrito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452022000100123&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818774771907690496
author CESAR FERNANDO MEURER
author_facet CESAR FERNANDO MEURER
author_sort CESAR FERNANDO MEURER
collection DOAJ
description Abstract I argue that Duffley’s sign-based semantics and embodied semantics may be mutually beneficial if we conceive them as a semantic theory and as a foundational theory, respectively. First, I describe embodied semantics as a research program that conceives the foundations of meaning in terms of embodied simulation. Afterwards, I draw attention to three points (the analysis of FOR, verbs of positive and negative recall, and causative verbs) where Duffley’s semantics could find support in such a foundational theory. Finally, I suggest that two pressing challenges currently on the agenda of embodied semantics (abstract language and sentence-level simulations) could be met by Duffley’s theory.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:46:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a42f268b7bc418fbd3f4d79401f2247
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2317-630X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:46:27Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Manuscrito
spelling doaj.art-0a42f268b7bc418fbd3f4d79401f22472022-12-21T21:10:32ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X2022-03-0145112314410.1590/0100-6045.2022.v45n1.cmCOULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?CESAR FERNANDO MEURERhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9504-0325Abstract I argue that Duffley’s sign-based semantics and embodied semantics may be mutually beneficial if we conceive them as a semantic theory and as a foundational theory, respectively. First, I describe embodied semantics as a research program that conceives the foundations of meaning in terms of embodied simulation. Afterwards, I draw attention to three points (the analysis of FOR, verbs of positive and negative recall, and causative verbs) where Duffley’s semantics could find support in such a foundational theory. Finally, I suggest that two pressing challenges currently on the agenda of embodied semantics (abstract language and sentence-level simulations) could be met by Duffley’s theory.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452022000100123&lng=en&tlng=enLinguistic meaningFoundations of meaningEmbodied cognition
spellingShingle CESAR FERNANDO MEURER
COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
Manuscrito
Linguistic meaning
Foundations of meaning
Embodied cognition
title COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
title_full COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
title_fullStr COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
title_full_unstemmed COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
title_short COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
title_sort could sign based semantics and embodied semantics benefit one another
topic Linguistic meaning
Foundations of meaning
Embodied cognition
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452022000100123&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT cesarfernandomeurer couldsignbasedsemanticsandembodiedsemanticsbenefitoneanother