The Metaphysics of Sophistry: Protagoras, Nāgārjuna, Antilogos
There is no category of thought more deliberately or explicitly relegated to a subordinate role in Plato’s dialogues than Sophists and sophistry. It is due to Plato’s influence that terms “sophist” and “sophistry” handed down to us have unilaterally negative associations—synonymous with lies and dec...
Main Author: | Robin Reames |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Humanities |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/11/5/105 |
Similar Items
-
Plato’s Usage of phone in Protagoras
by: Mostafa Younesie
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Refiguring Odysseus’ Apologue in Plato’s Protagoras
by: Àngel Pascual-Martin
Published: (2021-09-01) -
How many ἀρεταί in Plato's Protagoras?
by: Sebastiano Molinelli
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Departing from Perfect Goodness? The tetragonōs and the hugiēs man in Plato’s Protagoras
by: Elena Irrera
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Likeness of an Athenian tyrannical son. Young Hipocrates in Plato's Protagoras
by: Àngel
Published: (2024-05-01)