Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice

Euthanasia of companion animals is a challenging responsibility in the veterinary profession since veterinarians have to consider not only medical, but also legal, economic, emotional, social, and ethical factors in decision-making. To this end; an anonymous questionnaire-based survey of Austrian eq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svenja Springer, Florien Jenner, Alexander Tichy, Herwig Grimm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/2/44
_version_ 1818147739121221632
author Svenja Springer
Florien Jenner
Alexander Tichy
Herwig Grimm
author_facet Svenja Springer
Florien Jenner
Alexander Tichy
Herwig Grimm
author_sort Svenja Springer
collection DOAJ
description Euthanasia of companion animals is a challenging responsibility in the veterinary profession since veterinarians have to consider not only medical, but also legal, economic, emotional, social, and ethical factors in decision-making. To this end; an anonymous questionnaire-based survey of Austrian equine veterinarians examines the attitudes to the euthanasia of equine patients in a range of scenarios; to identify factors which may influence decisions on the ending of a horse’s life. This paper describes the distributions of demographic and attitude variables. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test the associations of gender, work experience, and equine workload with attitudes in relation to euthanasia statements and case scenarios. In total, 64 respondents (response rate = 23.4%) completed the questionnaire. The study showed that veterinarians consider contextual and relational factors in their decision-making. They are aware of owners’ emotional bonds with their horses and financial background, however, requests for convenience euthanasia are typically rejected. Although some significant differences between the tested variables emerged, the attitudes of the veterinarians were shown to be largely shared. In conclusion, veterinarians are aware of the multiple factors that influence their decision-making and gave indications as to the weight of animal- and owner-related factors in the handling of euthanasia.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:40:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a5bb2e56191411298c2a80ad96bb037
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:40:02Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-0a5bb2e56191411298c2a80ad96bb0372022-12-22T01:07:01ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152019-01-01924410.3390/ani9020044ani9020044Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine PracticeSvenja Springer0Florien Jenner1Alexander Tichy2Herwig Grimm3Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal-Studies, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, 1210 Vienna, AustriaUniversity Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, 1210 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, 1210 Vienna, AustriaUnit of Ethics and Human-Animal-Studies, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, 1210 Vienna, AustriaEuthanasia of companion animals is a challenging responsibility in the veterinary profession since veterinarians have to consider not only medical, but also legal, economic, emotional, social, and ethical factors in decision-making. To this end; an anonymous questionnaire-based survey of Austrian equine veterinarians examines the attitudes to the euthanasia of equine patients in a range of scenarios; to identify factors which may influence decisions on the ending of a horse’s life. This paper describes the distributions of demographic and attitude variables. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test the associations of gender, work experience, and equine workload with attitudes in relation to euthanasia statements and case scenarios. In total, 64 respondents (response rate = 23.4%) completed the questionnaire. The study showed that veterinarians consider contextual and relational factors in their decision-making. They are aware of owners’ emotional bonds with their horses and financial background, however, requests for convenience euthanasia are typically rejected. Although some significant differences between the tested variables emerged, the attitudes of the veterinarians were shown to be largely shared. In conclusion, veterinarians are aware of the multiple factors that influence their decision-making and gave indications as to the weight of animal- and owner-related factors in the handling of euthanasia.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/2/44euthanasiaequine veterinary medicinequestionnaire-based surveyveterinary medical ethics
spellingShingle Svenja Springer
Florien Jenner
Alexander Tichy
Herwig Grimm
Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice
Animals
euthanasia
equine veterinary medicine
questionnaire-based survey
veterinary medical ethics
title Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice
title_full Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice
title_fullStr Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice
title_full_unstemmed Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice
title_short Austrian Veterinarians’ Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice
title_sort austrian veterinarians attitudes to euthanasia in equine practice
topic euthanasia
equine veterinary medicine
questionnaire-based survey
veterinary medical ethics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/2/44
work_keys_str_mv AT svenjaspringer austrianveterinariansattitudestoeuthanasiainequinepractice
AT florienjenner austrianveterinariansattitudestoeuthanasiainequinepractice
AT alexandertichy austrianveterinariansattitudestoeuthanasiainequinepractice
AT herwiggrimm austrianveterinariansattitudestoeuthanasiainequinepractice