Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery Residents

Category: Ankle; Arthroscopy; Sports Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in graduating orthopedic resident case volume and variability for ankle arthroscopy. Methods: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hollie Garber, Suleiman Sudah, Chris Michel, Robert D. Faccone, Christopher M. Dijanic, Daniel J. Kerrigan, Glenn Gabisan MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-11-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00666
_version_ 1828330931046318080
author Hollie Garber
Suleiman Sudah
Chris Michel
Robert D. Faccone
Christopher M. Dijanic
Daniel J. Kerrigan
Glenn Gabisan MD
author_facet Hollie Garber
Suleiman Sudah
Chris Michel
Robert D. Faccone
Christopher M. Dijanic
Daniel J. Kerrigan
Glenn Gabisan MD
author_sort Hollie Garber
collection DOAJ
description Category: Ankle; Arthroscopy; Sports Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in graduating orthopedic resident case volume and variability for ankle arthroscopy. Methods: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating United States orthopedic surgery residents was assessed. Arthroscopy procedures of the leg/ankle were identified. The average number of cases performed per resident was compared from 2016 to 2020 to determine the percent change in case volume. The 10th, 30th, 50th, 70th, and 90th percentiles of case volumes from 2016 to 2020 were presented to demonstrate case volume variability. Results: There was no significant change in the average number of leg/ankle arthroscopy cases from 2016 to 2020 [6.2 +- 5 [range 0 to 35] vs. 6.1 +- 6 [range 0 to 76] [p=0.732], despite a 19% increase in the average number of total leg/ankle procedures performed over time (168.4 +- 47 [range 55-414] in 2016; 200.8 +- 57 in 2020 [range 67-601], p <0.001). There was wide variability in ankle arthroscopy case volume amongst residents. The 90th percentile of residents performed 13 cases in 2020, compared to 5 in 50th percentile, and 1 in the 10th percentile. Conclusion: Despite the growing popularity of ankle arthroscopy, orthopedic resident exposure to this technical procedure remains generally low. Understanding trends in case volume and variability is important for programs to ensure that orthopedic residents are gaining adequate exposure to increasingly popular procedures. Implementing minimum case requirements for ankle arthroscopy during orthopedic residency may be helpful to increase exposure to ankle arthroscopy and reduce variability in experience.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:46:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0a5fd70ec5264d568d0d872dab6e254f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:46:50Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-0a5fd70ec5264d568d0d872dab6e254f2022-12-22T02:30:39ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142022-11-01710.1177/2473011421S00666Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery ResidentsHollie GarberSuleiman SudahChris MichelRobert D. FacconeChristopher M. DijanicDaniel J. KerriganGlenn Gabisan MDCategory: Ankle; Arthroscopy; Sports Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in graduating orthopedic resident case volume and variability for ankle arthroscopy. Methods: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating United States orthopedic surgery residents was assessed. Arthroscopy procedures of the leg/ankle were identified. The average number of cases performed per resident was compared from 2016 to 2020 to determine the percent change in case volume. The 10th, 30th, 50th, 70th, and 90th percentiles of case volumes from 2016 to 2020 were presented to demonstrate case volume variability. Results: There was no significant change in the average number of leg/ankle arthroscopy cases from 2016 to 2020 [6.2 +- 5 [range 0 to 35] vs. 6.1 +- 6 [range 0 to 76] [p=0.732], despite a 19% increase in the average number of total leg/ankle procedures performed over time (168.4 +- 47 [range 55-414] in 2016; 200.8 +- 57 in 2020 [range 67-601], p <0.001). There was wide variability in ankle arthroscopy case volume amongst residents. The 90th percentile of residents performed 13 cases in 2020, compared to 5 in 50th percentile, and 1 in the 10th percentile. Conclusion: Despite the growing popularity of ankle arthroscopy, orthopedic resident exposure to this technical procedure remains generally low. Understanding trends in case volume and variability is important for programs to ensure that orthopedic residents are gaining adequate exposure to increasingly popular procedures. Implementing minimum case requirements for ankle arthroscopy during orthopedic residency may be helpful to increase exposure to ankle arthroscopy and reduce variability in experience.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00666
spellingShingle Hollie Garber
Suleiman Sudah
Chris Michel
Robert D. Faccone
Christopher M. Dijanic
Daniel J. Kerrigan
Glenn Gabisan MD
Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery Residents
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery Residents
title_full Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery Residents
title_fullStr Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery Residents
title_full_unstemmed Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery Residents
title_short Low Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Amongst Graduating Orthopedic Surgery Residents
title_sort low ankle arthroscopy procedural volume amongst graduating orthopedic surgery residents
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00666
work_keys_str_mv AT holliegarber lowanklearthroscopyproceduralvolumeamongstgraduatingorthopedicsurgeryresidents
AT suleimansudah lowanklearthroscopyproceduralvolumeamongstgraduatingorthopedicsurgeryresidents
AT chrismichel lowanklearthroscopyproceduralvolumeamongstgraduatingorthopedicsurgeryresidents
AT robertdfaccone lowanklearthroscopyproceduralvolumeamongstgraduatingorthopedicsurgeryresidents
AT christophermdijanic lowanklearthroscopyproceduralvolumeamongstgraduatingorthopedicsurgeryresidents
AT danieljkerrigan lowanklearthroscopyproceduralvolumeamongstgraduatingorthopedicsurgeryresidents
AT glenngabisanmd lowanklearthroscopyproceduralvolumeamongstgraduatingorthopedicsurgeryresidents