Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis
Context: Despite the advances in orthodontic material and treatment mechanics, the placement of fixed appliances increases the risk of enamel demineralization. The development of fluoride release adhesives has attracted considerable interests because the combined use of antimicrobials and fluoride e...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=4;spage=390;epage=395;aulast=Shobbana |
| _version_ | 1811219563785748480 |
|---|---|
| author | V R Shobbana Devi M Kumaraswamy Anand S Venkateswaran Kavitha S Iyer N R Krishnaswamy |
| author_facet | V R Shobbana Devi M Kumaraswamy Anand S Venkateswaran Kavitha S Iyer N R Krishnaswamy |
| author_sort | V R Shobbana Devi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Context: Despite the advances in orthodontic material and treatment mechanics, the placement of fixed appliances increases the risk of enamel demineralization. The development of fluoride release adhesives has attracted considerable interests because the combined use of antimicrobials and fluoride enhances the cariostatic effect.
Aim: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of fluoride release adhesives with established orthodontic adhesives and assess failure mode using adhesive remnant index (ARI).
Settings and Design: The present study included 80 maxillary premolars which were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20) and were further subdivided into two subgroups A - Pumice prophylaxis (PP) and subgroup B - No PP (n = 10).
Materials and Methods: Stainless steel brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, Transbond plus (TP) color change adhesive, Light Bond, and Clearfil protect bond. After debonding, the ARI was used to assess the mode of bracket failure.
Statistical Analysis: The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, Post-hoc Tukey Honest significant differences test, and Chi-square test.
Results: The mean SBS of Group 4 was comparably higher regardless of PP. Brackets bonded with TP showed a comparable SBS to conventional Transbond XT. The ARI scores were predominately 2.
Conclusions: Fluoride releasing adhesives combined with antibacterial monomer can play a vital role in reducing white spot lesions by enhancing the cariostatic effect especially in noncompliant\medically compromised patients. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:27:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0a61e4d259aa4e72b95e3a88f7974150 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:27:46Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-0a61e4d259aa4e72b95e3a88f79741502022-12-22T03:42:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032015-01-0126439039510.4103/0970-9290.167639Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxisV R Shobbana DeviM Kumaraswamy AnandS VenkateswaranKavitha S IyerN R KrishnaswamyContext: Despite the advances in orthodontic material and treatment mechanics, the placement of fixed appliances increases the risk of enamel demineralization. The development of fluoride release adhesives has attracted considerable interests because the combined use of antimicrobials and fluoride enhances the cariostatic effect. Aim: To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of fluoride release adhesives with established orthodontic adhesives and assess failure mode using adhesive remnant index (ARI). Settings and Design: The present study included 80 maxillary premolars which were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20) and were further subdivided into two subgroups A - Pumice prophylaxis (PP) and subgroup B - No PP (n = 10). Materials and Methods: Stainless steel brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, Transbond plus (TP) color change adhesive, Light Bond, and Clearfil protect bond. After debonding, the ARI was used to assess the mode of bracket failure. Statistical Analysis: The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, Post-hoc Tukey Honest significant differences test, and Chi-square test. Results: The mean SBS of Group 4 was comparably higher regardless of PP. Brackets bonded with TP showed a comparable SBS to conventional Transbond XT. The ARI scores were predominately 2. Conclusions: Fluoride releasing adhesives combined with antibacterial monomer can play a vital role in reducing white spot lesions by enhancing the cariostatic effect especially in noncompliant\medically compromised patients.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=4;spage=390;epage=395;aulast=ShobbanaAntibacterial monomerfluoridepumice prophylaxisself-etching primershear bond strength |
| spellingShingle | V R Shobbana Devi M Kumaraswamy Anand S Venkateswaran Kavitha S Iyer N R Krishnaswamy Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis Indian Journal of Dental Research Antibacterial monomer fluoride pumice prophylaxis self-etching primer shear bond strength |
| title | Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis |
| title_full | Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis |
| title_short | Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis |
| title_sort | comparison of shear bond strength of self etching fluoride releasing adhesives with and without pumice prophylaxis |
| topic | Antibacterial monomer fluoride pumice prophylaxis self-etching primer shear bond strength |
| url | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=4;spage=390;epage=395;aulast=Shobbana |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vrshobbanadevi comparisonofshearbondstrengthofselfetchingfluoridereleasingadhesiveswithandwithoutpumiceprophylaxis AT mkumaraswamyanand comparisonofshearbondstrengthofselfetchingfluoridereleasingadhesiveswithandwithoutpumiceprophylaxis AT svenkateswaran comparisonofshearbondstrengthofselfetchingfluoridereleasingadhesiveswithandwithoutpumiceprophylaxis AT kavithasiyer comparisonofshearbondstrengthofselfetchingfluoridereleasingadhesiveswithandwithoutpumiceprophylaxis AT nrkrishnaswamy comparisonofshearbondstrengthofselfetchingfluoridereleasingadhesiveswithandwithoutpumiceprophylaxis |