Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways'
This article engages Judith Butler’s 'Parting Ways' as a way to rethink the relations between critique and belonging as two aspects of contemporary political subjectivities. I argue that for Butler critique is an action performed by corporeal subjects. As such, it depends on cohabitation b...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Helsinki University Press
2021-07-01
|
| Series: | Redescriptions |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal-redescriptions.org/articles/340 |
| _version_ | 1818900082740690944 |
|---|---|
| author | Miri Rozmarin |
| author_facet | Miri Rozmarin |
| author_sort | Miri Rozmarin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article engages Judith Butler’s 'Parting Ways' as a way to rethink the relations between critique and belonging as two aspects of contemporary political subjectivities. I argue that for Butler critique is an action performed by corporeal subjects. As such, it depends on cohabitation being an ontological condition. Belonging, in the sense of sharing a place with others, assesses an affirmative stance – the commitment to safeguard the common conditions for a plurality of lives. The first part of the article regards Butler’s theorization of cohabitation and plurality as a framework in which the corporeal and embodied relations with others who share a place serve as a condition for critique rather than its limit. I argue that Butler’s Arendtian social ontology aims to offer a vision of political subjectivity that differs from contemporary forms of subjectivation. I further argue that in order to promote such vision of political subjectivity, a detailed description of cohabitation is required as a multi-layered affective and emotional relation with one’s surroundings. The second part of the article focuses on how Butler performs in her text this alternative vision of political subjectivity that affirms pluralization as a normative principle. By studying Butler’s account of her Jewishness as well as textual practices shaping the text, I argue that belonging can become a formative aspect of the critical subject through the acts of norms on one’s body as well as by critical engagement. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T19:58:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0a6b6e87687241bf86baba88dcc66321 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2308-0914 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T19:58:13Z |
| publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
| publisher | Helsinki University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Redescriptions |
| spelling | doaj.art-0a6b6e87687241bf86baba88dcc663212022-12-21T20:07:44ZengHelsinki University PressRedescriptions2308-09142021-07-0124110.33134/rds.340353Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways'Miri Rozmarin0Gender Studies Program, Bar-Ilan UniversityThis article engages Judith Butler’s 'Parting Ways' as a way to rethink the relations between critique and belonging as two aspects of contemporary political subjectivities. I argue that for Butler critique is an action performed by corporeal subjects. As such, it depends on cohabitation being an ontological condition. Belonging, in the sense of sharing a place with others, assesses an affirmative stance – the commitment to safeguard the common conditions for a plurality of lives. The first part of the article regards Butler’s theorization of cohabitation and plurality as a framework in which the corporeal and embodied relations with others who share a place serve as a condition for critique rather than its limit. I argue that Butler’s Arendtian social ontology aims to offer a vision of political subjectivity that differs from contemporary forms of subjectivation. I further argue that in order to promote such vision of political subjectivity, a detailed description of cohabitation is required as a multi-layered affective and emotional relation with one’s surroundings. The second part of the article focuses on how Butler performs in her text this alternative vision of political subjectivity that affirms pluralization as a normative principle. By studying Butler’s account of her Jewishness as well as textual practices shaping the text, I argue that belonging can become a formative aspect of the critical subject through the acts of norms on one’s body as well as by critical engagement.https://journal-redescriptions.org/articles/340critiquebelongingcohabitationpluralitycorporealityjudith butler |
| spellingShingle | Miri Rozmarin Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways' Redescriptions critique belonging cohabitation plurality corporeality judith butler |
| title | Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways' |
| title_full | Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways' |
| title_fullStr | Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways' |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways' |
| title_short | Critical Belonging: Cohabitation, Plurality, and Critique in Butler’s 'Parting Ways' |
| title_sort | critical belonging cohabitation plurality and critique in butler s parting ways |
| topic | critique belonging cohabitation plurality corporeality judith butler |
| url | https://journal-redescriptions.org/articles/340 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mirirozmarin criticalbelongingcohabitationpluralityandcritiqueinbutlerspartingways |