Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes
An important metric for many aspects of species conservation planning and risk assessment is an estimate of total population size. For landbirds breeding in North America, Partners in Flight (PIF) generates global, continental, and regional population size estimates. These estimates are an important...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | Avian Conservation and Ecology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ace-eco.org/vol14/iss1/art4/ |
| _version_ | 1797970079067930624 |
|---|---|
| author | Jessica C. Stanton Peter Blancher Kenneth V. Rosenberg Arvind O. Panjabi Wayne E. Thogmartin |
| author_facet | Jessica C. Stanton Peter Blancher Kenneth V. Rosenberg Arvind O. Panjabi Wayne E. Thogmartin |
| author_sort | Jessica C. Stanton |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | An important metric for many aspects of species conservation planning and risk assessment is an estimate of total population size. For landbirds breeding in North America, Partners in Flight (PIF) generates global, continental, and regional population size estimates. These estimates are an important component of the PIF species assessment process, but have also been used by others for a range of applications. The PIF population size estimates are primarily calculated using a formula designed to extrapolate bird counts recorded by the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) to regional population estimates. The extrapolation formula includes multiple assumptions and sources of uncertainty, but there were previously no attempts to quantify this uncertainty in the published population size estimates aside from a categorical data quality score. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we propagated the main sources of uncertainty arising from individual components of the model through to the final estimation of landbird population sizes. This approach results in distributions of population size estimates rather than point estimates. We found the width of uncertainty of population size estimates to be generally narrower than the order-of-magnitude distances between the population size score categories PIF uses in the species assessment process, suggesting confidence in the categorical ranking used by PIF. Our approach provides a means to identify species whose uncertainty bounds span more than one categorical rank, which was not previously possible with the data quality scores. Although there is still room for additional improvements to the estimation of avian population sizes and uncertainty, particularly with respect to replacing categorical model components with empirical estimates, our estimates of population size distributions have broader utility to a range of conservation planning and risk assessment activities relying on avian population size estimates. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T03:11:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0a76e199f44a4649b80b1c7b6e13f101 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1712-6568 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T03:11:14Z |
| publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Avian Conservation and Ecology |
| spelling | doaj.art-0a76e199f44a4649b80b1c7b6e13f1012023-01-02T11:24:28ZengResilience AllianceAvian Conservation and Ecology1712-65682019-06-0114141331Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizesJessica C. Stanton0Peter Blancher1Kenneth V. Rosenberg2Arvind O. Panjabi3Wayne E. Thogmartin4U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WIEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON (emeritus)Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NYBird Conservancy of the Rockies, Fort Collins, COU.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WIAn important metric for many aspects of species conservation planning and risk assessment is an estimate of total population size. For landbirds breeding in North America, Partners in Flight (PIF) generates global, continental, and regional population size estimates. These estimates are an important component of the PIF species assessment process, but have also been used by others for a range of applications. The PIF population size estimates are primarily calculated using a formula designed to extrapolate bird counts recorded by the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) to regional population estimates. The extrapolation formula includes multiple assumptions and sources of uncertainty, but there were previously no attempts to quantify this uncertainty in the published population size estimates aside from a categorical data quality score. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we propagated the main sources of uncertainty arising from individual components of the model through to the final estimation of landbird population sizes. This approach results in distributions of population size estimates rather than point estimates. We found the width of uncertainty of population size estimates to be generally narrower than the order-of-magnitude distances between the population size score categories PIF uses in the species assessment process, suggesting confidence in the categorical ranking used by PIF. Our approach provides a means to identify species whose uncertainty bounds span more than one categorical rank, which was not previously possible with the data quality scores. Although there is still room for additional improvements to the estimation of avian population sizes and uncertainty, particularly with respect to replacing categorical model components with empirical estimates, our estimates of population size distributions have broader utility to a range of conservation planning and risk assessment activities relying on avian population size estimates.http://www.ace-eco.org/vol14/iss1/art4/breeding bird surveypartners in flightpopulation sizespecies conservation assessmentuncertainty |
| spellingShingle | Jessica C. Stanton Peter Blancher Kenneth V. Rosenberg Arvind O. Panjabi Wayne E. Thogmartin Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes Avian Conservation and Ecology breeding bird survey partners in flight population size species conservation assessment uncertainty |
| title | Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes |
| title_full | Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes |
| title_fullStr | Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes |
| title_short | Estimating uncertainty of North American landbird population sizes |
| title_sort | estimating uncertainty of north american landbird population sizes |
| topic | breeding bird survey partners in flight population size species conservation assessment uncertainty |
| url | http://www.ace-eco.org/vol14/iss1/art4/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jessicacstanton estimatinguncertaintyofnorthamericanlandbirdpopulationsizes AT peterblancher estimatinguncertaintyofnorthamericanlandbirdpopulationsizes AT kennethvrosenberg estimatinguncertaintyofnorthamericanlandbirdpopulationsizes AT arvindopanjabi estimatinguncertaintyofnorthamericanlandbirdpopulationsizes AT wayneethogmartin estimatinguncertaintyofnorthamericanlandbirdpopulationsizes |